On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 11:15:06PM +0200, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
I'm also inquiring about hardware for a new system.
Based on previous posts (with some replacements for parts I didn't
readily found in the closest shop), here is my tentative list (with
alternative choices):
CPU
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 08:21:53PM -0500, Jaime Ochoa Malag?n wrote:
The RAM is very important take care of this...
True. So far I have been happy with Corsair, and OCZ. Certainly go for
a well known name brand.
--
Len Sorensen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 06:02:02AM +, Sam Varghese wrote:
I have used both Intel and AMD dual-core and find AMD better for my work;
I'm basing this on one thing, the speed of processing video files.
Which intel? The P4 was a piece of [EMAIL PROTECTED] design wise. The Core 2
is
nothing
Of course you can get a stupid little Athlon 64 X2 3600+ system from
dell for $399CDN at the moment. Hard to beat that price/performance
ratio. Of course it is a Dell, so who knows... :)
--
Len Sorensen
If you go the Dell route be sure to pick the Ubuntu pre-installed
choice. It may be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 04:09:22PM -0400 Lennart Sorensen said:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 06:02:02AM +, Sam Varghese wrote:
I have used both Intel and AMD dual-core and find AMD better for my work;
I'm basing this on one thing, the speed of
Is this an issue with the amd64 arch, or something else? I have an AMD
5600+ cpu paired with an Nvidia 7600 GS card, which strikes me as more
than adequate to work with a DVD (my older XP 2500+ had no problems...).
The video is literally jerky, and poorly sync'd with the audio. It
doesn't seem
6 matches
Mail list logo
