On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
All of these provide vastly better performance than the current
incarnations of ATLAS in 64bit.
How recent is your data? I was under the impression that Atlas had
caught up with GOTO and ACML, and possibly even the Intel libraries on
the Core
Irene Laiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dear all,
I'm new to Linux. I've just installed Debian 4.0 on a server based on EA64T
architecture. When trying to install the Intel Fortran Compiler, the
installation fails because the IA-32 version of the following libraries cannot
be found:
libstdc++
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 11:01 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Irene Laiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dear all,
I'm new to Linux. I've just installed Debian 4.0 on a server based on EA64T
architecture. When trying to install the Intel Fortran Compiler, the
installation fails because the
Hej,
you can find a well written description on how to install the Intel
compilers on Debian here:
http://www.theochem.uwa.edu.au/fortran/intel_on_debian
The scripts given there fail to correct all stages of the .deb
post-installation procedure, but as far as I can see, the only problem
is
Giacomo Mulas wrote:
Two or three months, when I last compiled the latest version of the big
quantum chemistry code (NWChem) I use (which spends a lot of time doing
floating point linear algebra). The computer on which I tested is a
relatively old Athlon 64 3500+, your mileage may vary on
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
had very deep pipelines. If NWChem is anything like that, I'm not
surprised the Intel compilers do a better job than GCC -- I don't think
GCC knows much about all the specifics of tweaking such things as
keeping data in caches, re-use,
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 04:40:52PM -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
Hi folks, I just bought a pair of AMD64 systems for a work project,
and I'm confused about the performance I'm getting from them. Both are
identically configured Dell Dimension C521
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 06:50:57AM -0700, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
I wouldn't throw away that Intel compiler just yet. For that matter, I'd
give serious consideration to switching to a Core 2 Duo and a copy of
Intel's tuning tools ... they are quite good. Life's too short to wait
for
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 06:50:57AM -0700, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
I wouldn't throw away that Intel compiler just yet. For that matter, I'd
give serious consideration to switching to a Core 2 Duo and a copy of
Intel's tuning tools ... they are quite good.
9 matches
Mail list logo
