Nos bureaux seront fermés jusqu'au lundi 23 juillet 2007. Nous répondrons à
votre email dès notre retour et vous remercions de votre compréhension.
Nous profitons de la présente afin de vous souhaiter un bel été!
Our offices are closed until July 23rd. We will answer to your email as soon as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't have any facts or numbers to bring forward, but you probably
won't notice that much of a difference.
What do you base this opinion on?
Having said that, I would say go for the AMD64 port.
I don't think the install is anywhere near less
straightforward than
Quoting Neil Gunton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't have any facts or numbers to bring forward, but you probably
won't notice that much of a difference.
What do you base this opinion on?
Nothing really,
I've setup a handful of amd64 servers and a whack of i386 ones.
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 07:29:25AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Neil Gunton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Does anybody else have any opinions on whether software RAID would be
faster than using the built-in Adaptec SmartRaid 2015S card?
Etch has full SW raid support right out of the
On Thursday 05 July 2007 22:07, Neil Gunton wrote:
Hi all,
I am going to be rebuilding a server in August which has been running
Sarge AMD64 for the last couple of years in a colo environment. I am
going to do a total rebuild (need to repartition the disks). Since I am
using the dpt_i2o
On July 6, 2007 07:29 am [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Neil Gunton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't have any facts or numbers to bring forward, but you probably
won't notice that much of a difference.
What do you base this opinion on?
Nothing really,
I've setup
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 04:07:23PM +0100, Adam Stiles wrote:
You won't be able to use all of your 4GB RAM with a 32-bit kernel. A 32-bit
processor only has 4GB of addressing space, and that has to be shared between
memory and peripherals.
Not true. With PAE, a 36-bit address is
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 07:53:18AM -0500, Neil Gunton wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The AMD64 port is less straightforward because they do not include the
dpt_i2o driver, which is necessary for my RAID card. Instead, I have to
either use the i2o_block driver, which I gather has had some
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 04:07:23PM +0100, Adam Stiles wrote:
advantage that you can have your swap area without redundancy, hence running
as fast as possible (just set up the partitions as separate swap areas).
However, with non-raid swap, if something happens to one drive, the
system dies
Hi dear maintainers,
now I could verify the package which causes the freeze of my system: They are
the Nvidia-packages (100.14.11), which are causing the freeze. A bugreport
has been sent. I downgraded first the kernel, with no success. Then
downgraded Nvidia-packages and it was o.k..
On Thu July 5 2007 09:02:02 am Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Hi dear maintainers,
after the last upgrade my system randomly freezes when running in X.
The main things I upgraded, was the kernel from 2.6.21-1-amd64 to
2.6.21-2-amd64 and the Nvidia-packages (nvidia-kernel, -glx and -glx-ia32)
I
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 03:29:02PM +0100, Rob Andrews wrote:
On 04-Jul-2007 02:54.42 (BST), Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
in the freeze of etch nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.3-1+b1 use libc6 = 2.3.5
I suppose you could use snapshot.debian.net to obtain that version
that works very good until
On Fri July 6 2007 07:38:08 pm Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 03:29:02PM +0100, Rob Andrews wrote:
On 04-Jul-2007 02:54.42 (BST), Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
in the freeze of etch nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.3-1+b1 use libc6 =
2.3.5 I suppose you could use
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
Without the driver, will the card just look like a non-raid card or will
the drives not be visiable at all? If the drives are visible, forget
the hardware raid.
Without the driver (either dpt_i2o or i2o_block) the hard drives are not
visible at all, and you cannot
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Etch has full SW raid support right out of the install. No messing with
kernels.
I didn't see anything about this in the recent home install I did... and
I was specifically paying attention to look out for it, since I had just
bought two identical 320 GB WD drives to
Adam Stiles wrote:
You won't be able to use all of your 4GB RAM with a 32-bit kernel. A 32-bit
processor only has 4GB of addressing space, and that has to be shared between
memory and peripherals.
Really? I thought that the only limitation was on individual processes
not having more than
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 04:07:23PM +0100, Adam Stiles wrote:
You won't be able to use all of your 4GB RAM with a 32-bit kernel. A 32-bit
processor only has 4GB of addressing space, and that has to be shared between
memory and peripherals.
Not true. With PAE, a
17 matches
Mail list logo
