Dieter Rohlfing wrote:
Hello Hendrik,
If I shall do a chroot, I need a second system, which is 64-bit. In that case I
don't need a mixed system (64-bit kernel + 32-bit userland), then I prefer a
pure 64-bit system and my original problem is vanished.
If you only want to compile amd64
Dieter Rohlfing wrote:
So there's a need for a second system. Then I prefer one system, which is pure
64-bit.
In pure 64-bit system there is problem with java/flash web plug-ins .
The workaround is (you may guess) 32-bit chroot.
Mixed (kernel amd64 userland 32-bit) as mentioned on
On Thursday 03 Jul 2008, Dieter Rohlfing wrote:
So there's a need for a second system. Then I prefer one system, which is
pure 64-bit.
If you're going for a pure 64-bit system, then you'll most probably also have
to go to for a pure Free Software system, since a lot of proprietary, Caged
Hi List
There have been some threads about opera for amd64 on this list. So, if it
hasn't gotten around already : Since version 9.5 opera is available as a x86_64
.deb
Feels good not to have to chroot or dpkg -i --force-architecture the i386
package anymore. 8-)
Cheers
Michael
p.s.: deb
there was a beta 64bit for ages. it worked perfectly and i think was
marked 'beta' purely as a notice that there may be some issues they
werent yet awair of.
but yeah. 9.5 is great.
Dean
Michael Dominok wrote:
Hi List
There have been some threads about opera for amd64 on this list. So, if
5 matches
Mail list logo
