f.carone wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm using the ubuntu Xorg server, with the composite and transparency
correctly working. I'm also using the opensource radeon driver shipped
with it. I get good 3D performances (~2000fps in windowed glxgears)
but transparency (set by transset) is really slow, while
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For my first installation attempt I used the 125MB netinst iso (2005-01-24 I
think). Installation worked quite fine with that one exception that it had no
networking modules and no support for [reiserfs | ext3 | xfs ] so I had to
use ext2 which I really don't like for a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for the installation, can DFS be used to install amd64-sarge?
I tried this last year using the same images from October.
The DFS takes more expertise to use than the Debian Installer.
The DFS boots into ram like a LiveCD unless you tell the kernel
to boot an existing
Goswin wrote:
So anyone willing to test testing, esspecialy a fresh install, can
point apt to:
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 testing main contrib non-free
OK. I remember some things from my first install so now I can check.
I used the above sources.list with this image:
Goswin wrote:
I used the above sources.list with this image:
sid-amd64-netinst.iso11-Feb-2005 09:01 193M Maybe that is the
wrong image to test the debian-pure64 testing. After reboot the
base config did not allow manual package selection.
I tried again and base config failed again on file
Goswin wrote:
So anyone willing to test testing, esspecialy a fresh
install, can point apt to:
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64
testing main contrib non-free
This time I used this image:
sarge-amd64-netinst.iso 15-Jan-2005 17:38 125M
The installer from 15
Jaime Ochoa Malagón wrote:
c) X don't complain to much...
Simply the screen go black and the system never go back.
I can't figure out what is the problem.
Thanks
Pure64
ASUS A8V deluxe
Kernel 2.6.10-9-amd64-k8
VideoCard PowerColor 9250 (RADEON 9250)
Monitor ViewSonic G90fb
Goswin wrote:
I tried again and base config failed again on file
server config and manual package config. This could be
the same problem as below.
I don't understand what you mean here. I guess I have to
see it with my own eyes. I suspect some deb is stuck the
upload queue that base-config needs
Goswin wrote:
I exited the base config and tried dselect and there
were conflicts with dependency on libc6. The
libc6-dev depends on libc6 = 2.3.2.ds1-20 and libc6
was version 2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64.
I think that would be fixed in a day or two.
I think everything will work after sarge is
Goswin wrote already:
I will build a
new sarge image once the ~500MB remaining debs are uploaded.
Whoops! That would be great! Sorry for the previous trivia.
:-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greetings Goswin,
I just tried the 13 Feb sid-amd64-monolithic.iso wondering
if this installer would fetch everything from the internet
without having any internal packages. There was a problem
with selecting the mirrors. The installer correctly looked
for an debian-amd64 mirror except the
Tobias wrote:
-- Hi,
first of all I want to thank anyone who made this AMD64 port possible.
But now here are my experiences:
The system is a MSI K8N Neo4 Platinum (S939 nForce4 Ultra) with a SATA-2 HDD
on the primary nForce SATA-2 port.
For my first installation attempt I used the 125MB
Jaime Ochoa Malagón wrote:
The ati driver say:
(II) Primary Device is: PCI 01:00:0
(II) ATI: Candidate Device section Radeon_Analog_Output.
(WW) ATI: PCI/AGP Mach64 in slot 1:0:0 could not be detected!
(WW) ATI: PCI/AGP Mach64 in slot 1:0:1 could not be detected!
Yes. This happened to me also
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can confirm the SATA problems with the sid-amd64-netinst.iso image from 11 Feb. Grub
doesn't install correctly and freezes the machine on boot (clean install) after
displaying the message Grub loading stage 1.5.
Using expert install-mode, LILO refuses to install at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Grub problem?
I don't use grub at all. I have the first disk partition
formatted for DOS and use the loadlin.exe program to boot
Linux.
I had an old MSDOS available. There is also a FreeDOS that
is reported to work. I have never used syslinux that also
boots from a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To test - we also downloaded the sarge i386 iso, which does boot fine on our system - but we would ideally like to be running an ia64 based system (we do numerical computing)
Our system is
Asus k8n-e deluxe
AMD64 CPU (Sempron +3000)
LG DVD-RAM drive
Sorry,
Goswin wrote:
Hi,
the new sid netinst image is uploaded and moved into place. The sarge
one is rsyncing with yesterdays updates. Sorry it took so long, I
nearly forgot to downgrade the libc6 and base-files to unpatched
versions and that took more doing than I expected.
Enjoy.
Goswin
I
Oops: That was actually an error reading the Release file
not Packages file as previously here:
Goswin wrote:
Hi,
the new sid netinst image is uploaded and moved into place. The sarge
one is rsyncing with yesterdays updates. Sorry it took so long, I
nearly forgot to downgrade the libc6 and
P.S. The sid installation using sid-amd64-netinst.iso was
fine. The sarge installation using sid-amd64-netinst.iso
probably left the packages mixed for people who are
concerned about that. I didn't explain about the hardware
used so that can be found below.
The 18 Feb sid-amd64-netinst.iso
Goswin-
I apologize for the mixup:
Oops: That was actually an error reading the Release file not Packages file as previously here:
The 18 Feb sarge-amd64-netinst.iso Installer error message
said: error reading /cdrom/dists//Release
I am fairly sure that would be the same as this showing the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.S. The sid installation using sid-amd64-netinst.iso was fine. The sarge
installation using sid-amd64-netinst.iso probably left the packages mixed for
people who are concerned about that. I didn't explain about the hardware used
so that can be found below.
Q: What are
Installation Report (resending)
Hello Everybody-
I am sending email from a fresh sid install from pure64 using the 18 Feb 2005
sid-amd64-monolithic.iso installer.
This install was my first to complete using any monolithic image.
The base installation was halted twice when my DSL modem crashed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm still using Xfree86 and finally I got 2K fps, that's really pretty
amazing now, but I have a trouble with the images, I just test with
the screen savers and many of them work very fast but the image is
corrupt, I see only pieces in the Bubble 3D GL, is like just
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not only gpm doesn't start at boot time, but after a while, randomly,
it completely freezes the machine once activated. It happens with every
kernel 2.6.x I tried since my first pure64 installation.
I'm quite sure that gpm is the culprit as since I removed it my system
is
Goswin wrote:
Hi,
I got 2 new SATA drives and pluged them into the onboard Promise
PDC20376 (FastTrak 376) and run badblocks on them (both in
parallel). The write test completed fine but readcompare locked up my
system.
I repeated with a read-only test and again it locked up with an DMA
timeout.
Goswin wrote:
I got 2 new SATA drives and pluged them into the onboard Promise
PDC20376 (FastTrak 376) and run badblocks on them (both in
parallel). The write test completed fine but readcompare locked up my
system.
I repeated with a read-only test and again it locked up with an DMA
timeout.
Does
Hi, this is the mlmmj program managing the mailinglist
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm sorry to inform you that Your mail could not be delivered to the
list. Your mail was rejected because it matched a rule set up by the
list administrator.
Thanks.
Hi, this is the mlmmj program managing the mailinglist
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You have tried to post from this email address:
debian-x86-64@lists.debian.org
But this address is not subscribed, and only subscribers can post to
the list.
If You believe you are subscribed, please check the email
28 matches
Mail list logo
