(Reply-to set to debian-boot list)
kernel udeb status
==
Because I had to test the changes below anyway, I have done what I guess
will be my last massbuild and upload of kernel/module udebs.
All arches are now at 2.6.21-2, with the following exceptions:
- sparc: at 2.6.20
Hello D-I porters,
Most architectures should now be able to switch to 2.6.20 for D-I (except
for arm, hppa and m68k). i386 and amd64 have already been switched.
Over the past two weeks Joey has done the needed work for i386 and amd64
(and necessary updates in kernel-wedge), but we've waited
On Thursday 22 March 2007 00:36, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
So we have an linux-image-2.6.18-4-amd64 and amd64-libs packages on
i386. The default gcc version supports building 64 bit binaries, I
suggest you change gcc-3.4 by toolchain.
Anyway, the limits are outdated by now. I think the current
Hi,
I've made some changes to the general port page and the AMD64 page in
preparation for Etch. These changes will become active when Etch is
released, but can be previewed at:
http://www.debian.lichtenheld.net/ports/
http://www.debian.lichtenheld.net/ports/amd64/
Please compare these pages
(BCC to d-ports)
For all architectures, except for m68k, installer and CD/DVD images of
what is going to be D-I RC2 are now available for testing. RC2 is
scheduled to be the D-I release shipped with Etch.
Netboot, floppy and hd-media images are available from:
Hi all,
As you've probably noticed, what's intended to be the final kernel for
Etch has been uploaded yesterday.
I'm currently building and uploading the kernel udebs for all arches
(except arm and m68k for which images are not yet available). I'll also
upload new loop-aes module udebs for
(BCCed to d-ports)
Hello,
We received a BR that the list of porters for PowerPC on the Organization
webpage [1] was outdated. However, this seems to be true for most ports.
Please reply to debian-www@lists.debian.org with an updated list of active
porters for your port after discussing
We are ready to make the switch to 2.6.18 for Debian Installer.
For most architectures the 2.6.18-6 (ABI -3) should now be available in
unstable.
Please update the kernel udebs for your architecture ASAP.
Cheers,
FJP
pgp5StV8F21tW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Saturday 28 October 2006 22:00, Douglas Tutty wrote:
I'm at the point of choosing which kernel to install:
linux-image-2.6-amd64-generic
linux-image-2.6.17-2amd64
linux-image-2.6-amd64
There is absolutely no difference :-)
In fact the only real kernel image package in
than English, consider installing in
that language; note that one last round of translation updates is
still planned, but reports of issues are still appreciated
TIA,
Frans Pop
[1]http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.i386/ch06s03.html#di-partition
[2]http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual
Things are finally starting to come together for RC1.
- We've found a good work-around for the bug in g-i where selected lines
in multi-select lists would not be shown. We need new versions of
some gtk packages for that, but these have now been uploaded.
Thanks especially to Loïc Minier for
On Friday 22 September 2006 16:39, Grant Grundler wrote:
I didn't see anything for parisc (HPPA).
I don't know of any problems with initramfs on parisc.
but I don't expect any surprises from the kernel on that.
Maybe I was not clear enough on this. The original text was:
* type of initrd used
actually read the mail?
Is it useful that I send such mails at all?
On Sunday 17 September 2006 14:28, Frans Pop wrote:
Dear (d-i) porters,
First mass upload of kernel udebs
=
Today I have uploaded kernel udeb updates to 2.6.17-9 _for all arches_
Hello all,
Today I have made a few fairly big commits (touching many files at least)
to prepare for the addition of a new variant of the manual for the AMD64
architecture (closing #305977).
No real changes have been made yet. Today's commits were just laying the
groundwork and have made the
This mail is intended for AMD64 Sarge ftp-masters.
I have today uploaded debian-installer (20050317sarge1) to stable. This
upload of the installer is intended to be released with Sarge 3.1r3 and
is required to keep some installation methods working.
The reason some installation methods will no
://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/sid/main/installer-arch/current/images/
Known issues:
- S/390 Beta 3 candidate images are broken; will be fixed with next upload
- Lowmem settings in Beta 3 images are not yet correct; see below
On Monday 24 July 2006 11:52, Frans Pop wrote:
One important TODO item
On Sunday 30 July 2006 21:00, dann frazier wrote:
Here's the status of the lkdi rebuilds for 3.1r3.
Thanks Dann.
l-k-di-amd64-2.6: build available in gluck:~dannf/3.1r3-lkdi-rebuilds
amd64 guys: should i upload this somewhere?
They should preferably end up in:
(Please reply only to debian-boot; reply-to set accordingly; add other
recipients only selectively)
Now that linux-2.6.16 has safely landed in testing a few days ago, we can
really start working on the Beta 3 release of D-I. In fact, the migration
of most udebs to testing is already in
(Please reply only to d-boot; Reply-to set accordingly)
The latest upload of linux-2.6.16 is now (after today's mirror sync)
available for all architectures except arm.
As there were important changes, we should rebuild the kernel udebs
against 2.6.16-17 before starting the builds of
(Please reply only to d-boot and optionally the relevant port list.)
Hello d-i porters,
Now that 2.6.16-15 kernels have been uploaded to unstable (using a
linux-2.6.16 source package), we can start thinking about the Etch Beta 3
release of D-I.
Currently all architectures, except for arm,
JFYI
As a result of #374228 we've discovered that the debian-cd build machine
has not been syncing the daily built d-i images for some time.
The result of this was that for a while daily netinst and businesscard
images have been built using outdated initrds in combination with newer
udebs
On Thursday 15 June 2006 00:42, Frederik Schueler wrote:
-generic is odd and too long. I am considering to change the naming
scheme completely, and call the flavours 2.6.x-y-amd64 and
2.6.x-y-em64t respectively.
So what do you choose if you need a kernel that supports both? Both are
(Also replying to other mails about Sarge support in Etch installer)
On Wednesday 07 June 2006 20:42, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I ment that when you select sarge in choose-mirror in expert mode you
get the inofficial list and if you choose etch/etch+1/sid
On Thursday 08 June 2006 13:33, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
- increasing differences between the Sarge 2.6.8 and current kernels;
That is a reason for.
Only if we _would_ include some backports repository that is known to have
a current backported kernel and all other packages needed with
(Removed irrelevant CCs for this question)
On Wednesday 07 June 2006 10:11, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
If possibly it would be nice to have different mirror lists for sarge
and etch/sid in choose-mirror.
This is not really a problem.
choose-mirror for Sarge will remain unchanged and thus
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 21:32, dann frazier wrote:
I don't think its very likely that amd64/sarge will be added to
debian.org,
I did not mean to imply that of course.
but this is a good question for the amd64.debian.net maintainers.
The main reason we need to know is that the d-i source
Today a new version of choose-mirror was uploaded that contains an updated
mirrorlist and also has the normal mirrors as default for AMD64 instead
of amd64.debian.net.
As AMD64 is not yet installable from testing, this may break network based
installations. Installations (in expert mode) of
, Frans Pop wrote:
In more detail:
1) Upload new i386 kernel udebs for both 2.4 and 2.6 to s-p-u (I've
already prepared a set)
2) Get these acked by SRM so they actually show up in s-p-u; s-p-u
already has debian-installer sections, I'm not sure if the acceptance
queue and approval stuff
(resending because of error in list address; reply-to set to include
original recipients)
Hello,
We have received two requests for the inclusion of mpt* modules for AMD64
in Debian Installer. The first is listed below, the second is #367634.
AFAICT mpt* modules should be included in the
On Saturday 08 April 2006 18:31, Steve McIntyre wrote:
At the moment the regular CD builds for amd64 are still using the
separate amd64 archive from ftbfs.debian.net. As amd64 is about to hit
testing in the mainr archive Real Soon Now, I'm planning on moving the
CD builds over to use the
(This was supposed to be BCC'ed to d-ports...)
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: [D-I] Post-release notes
Date: Saturday 18 March 2006 03:25
From: Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
As the last action for the Beta 2 release, the links for the daily
On Thursday 16 March 2006 14:36, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 12:42:43PM +0100, linuxdvds.de wrote:
Hello,
I think something must be wrong with the etch amd64 dvds under
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-dvd/
Have not tried to install with these
I am very happy to announce that the debian-installer images targeted for
Beta2 are now in testing (except AMD64) and that daily (etch_d-i) netinst
and buisinesscard CD images using them are now available from [1].
These images use the 2.6.15-7 kernel.
Note: full CD images are not yet
(already sent to d-boot)
On Tuesday 07 March 2006 13:52, Frans Pop wrote:
I am very happy to announce that the debian-installer images targeted
for Beta2 are now in testing (except AMD64) and that daily (etch_d-i)
netinst and buisinesscard CD images using them are now available from
[1
I've made a complete mess of CD images for Beta2 so far as the result of a
wrong assumption. This means, as some installation reports and comments
have shown, that CD images linked from [1] have been broken since last
Friday.
The good news is that there are now good Beta2 netinst and
migrations should also happen for AMD64.
TIA,
Frans Pop
pgpwlcsSmqebG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
reassign 335653 debian-cd
severity 335653 important
retitle 335653 Several required packages missing on amd64 20051024 daily
thanks
On Wednesday 26 October 2005 09:20, Anthony Lau wrote:
Attached is /var/log/messages with set -x in debootstrap.
Thanks very much! This makes the issue a lot
On Saturday 08 October 2005 15:40, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
d-i is failing to build on amd64 with the following error:
Language: en
Architecture: amd64
Info: creating temporary profiled .xml file...
Error: unknown architecture 'amd64'
The building of the manual was just taken out of the build of
unknown 82801GR/GH/GHM (ICH7 Family) PCI Express
Port 5
808627e2unknown unknown 82801GR/GH/GHM (ICH7 Family) PCI Express
Port 6
TIA,
Frans Pop
pgpxryjuyeyqY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thursday 09 June 2005 13:59, Frederik Schueler wrote:
please find attached a patch adding the amd64 architecture to the
english release notes.
I have one major problem with the patch, even after the reworking already
done by Frank.
You have disabled the whole chapter on upgrading, but
On Sunday 12 June 2005 20:41, Frederik Schueler wrote:
I'll send another diff based on all these changes ASAP.
That's not needed. I have the patch almost ready and will send it to you
for review this evening. There are some other technical changes I made as
well.
Also, I'm working on some
On Sunday 12 June 2005 20:49, Frans Pop wrote:
That's not needed. I have the patch almost ready and will send it to
you for review this evening. There are some other technical changes I
made as well.
Here's the proposed patch. Please check carefully.
The diff is against revision 1.56
This installation report has not yet had a reply. As most of the issues
seem amd64 kernel related, could someone from the AMD64 team please
answer this report?
TIA,
Frans Pop
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Bug#305238: Installation report: AMD AThlonXP 1800+ / Abit
KR7A
On Thursday 19 May 2005 20:06, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 07:23:44PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
This installation report has not yet had a reply. As most of the
issues seem amd64 kernel related, could someone from the AMD64 team
please answer this report?
Athlon XP = k7
(Resending to arch lists.)
If there is any architecture specific news that you'd like to have
included in the Release Notes (like new subarchs supported or dropped),
please send a proposed text to the d-doc mailing list (CC your
architecture list) before the end of this week.
Cheers,
Frans
45 matches
Mail list logo
