On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 07:54:39PM -0600, Karl Schmidt wrote:
I made the module with out any problem with m-a. I seem to have all the
same versions except for nvidia-glx
wajig list nvidia
ii nvidia-glx1.0.8776-4 NVIDIA binary
XFree86 4.x driver
ii
Stephen Cormier wrote:
It is definitely the problem you won't get it to install unless you rebuild
the package source
Which package source? please email me the corrected package - what ever it is (BTW there are
ways to force installation - wouldn't that work?)
having modified it so
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 12:56:46PM -0600, Karl Schmidt wrote:
Which package source? please email me the corrected package - what ever it
is (BTW there are ways to force installation - wouldn't that work?)
Using force pretty much always leaves you with a broken dependancy set
which will have to
On January 22, 2008 04:07:58 pm Stephen Cormier wrote:
On January 22, 2008 02:56:46 pm Karl Schmidt wrote:
Stephen Cormier wrote:
It is definitely the problem you won't get it to install unless you
rebuild the package source
Which package source? please email me the corrected package
Karl Schmidt wrote:
I think I shouldn't have updated to lenny -- I can't get nvidia
working and I need it for a dual head setup (I don't think the nv
driver can do this).
Not sure which way to go from here:
* Use the nvidia supplied drivers? (I've never done this)
* Is there a way to use
The versions abobe 100.14.09 must use Xorg7.3 and higher, due to a new ABI in
the Nvidia drivers.
100.14.19 builds and works fine on Etch as did 100.14.09. Only the
debian package requires Xorg = 7.3 which can easily be changed by
lowering the version numbers in the debian/control.in file in
On January 20, 2008 11:53:33 pm Karl Schmidt wrote:
Stephen Cormier wrote:
HappyTux:/# uname -r
2.6.23
This seems to be where I have lost the trail. I have:
# uname -a
Linux singapore 2.6.22-3-amd64 #1 SMP Sun Nov 4 18:18:09 UTC 2007 x86_64
GNU/Linux
And; I don't see a 2.6.23 kernel
Stephen Cormier wrote:
I have the packages for those still
laying around as well so if you want you can try both if your email address
will accept attachments of around 5mb for the largest of the files.
Stephen
I made the module with out any problem with m-a. I seem to have all the same
On January 21, 2008 09:54:39 pm Karl Schmidt wrote:
Stephen Cormier wrote:
I have the packages for those still
laying around as well so if you want you can try both if your email
address will accept attachments of around 5mb for the largest of the
files.
Stephen
I made the module
Am Sonntag, 20. Januar 2008 schrieb Karl Schmidt:
I think I shouldn't have updated to lenny -- I can't get nvidia working and
I need it for a dual head setup (I don't think the nv driver can do
this).
Not sure which way to go from here:
* Use the nvidia supplied drivers? (I've never done
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 08:59:37PM -0600, Karl Schmidt wrote:
I think I shouldn't have updated to lenny -- I can't get nvidia working and
I need it for a dual head setup (I don't think the nv driver can do this).
Not sure which way to go from here:
* Use the nvidia supplied drivers? (I've
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 05:21:59PM +0100, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
1. delete all /usr/src/modules/nv*
Fine.
2. delete /usr/src/nvidia-source*.tgz
Deleting file beloging to packages is generally a bad plan. Don't do
that.
3. delete all formerly built packages (i.e. nvidia-kernel-bla***.deb)
Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Hi !
To get the newest NVidia-packages installed and built, you can follow these
steps:
1. delete all /usr/src/modules/nv*
2. delete /usr/src/nvidia-source*.tgz
3. delete all formerly built packages (i.e. nvidia-kernel-bla***.deb)
4. deinstall nvidia-source and
Am Sonntag, 20. Januar 2008 schrieb Karl Schmidt:
Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Hi !
To get the newest NVidia-packages installed and built, you can follow
these steps:
1. delete all /usr/src/modules/nv*
2. delete /usr/src/nvidia-source*.tgz
3. delete all formerly built packages (i.e.
On January 20, 2008 09:05:32 pm Stephen Cormier wrote:
On January 20, 2008 05:05:29 pm Karl Schmidt wrote:
Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Hi !
To get the newest NVidia-packages installed and built, you can follow
these steps:
1. delete all /usr/src/modules/nv*
2. delete
On January 20, 2008 05:05:29 pm Karl Schmidt wrote:
Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Hi !
To get the newest NVidia-packages installed and built, you can follow
these steps:
1. delete all /usr/src/modules/nv*
2. delete /usr/src/nvidia-source*.tgz
3. delete all formerly built packages (i.e.
Stephen Cormier wrote:
HappyTux:/# uname -r
2.6.23
This seems to be where I have lost the trail. I have:
# uname -a
Linux singapore 2.6.22-3-amd64 #1 SMP Sun Nov 4 18:18:09 UTC 2007 x86_64
GNU/Linux
And; I don't see a 2.6.23 kernel to install?
Where did you get it?
I think I shouldn't have updated to lenny -- I can't get nvidia working and I need it for a
dual head setup (I don't think the nv driver can do this).
Not sure which way to go from here:
* Use the nvidia supplied drivers? (I've never done this)
* Is there a way to use the etch drivers?
* Get
Karl
On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 20:59 -0600, Karl Schmidt wrote:
I think I shouldn't have updated to lenny -- I can't get nvidia working and I
need it for a
dual head setup (I don't think the nv driver can do this).
That depends. Are you using a video card with two heads or two cards?
If your
But they are NOT compatible. That means they don't work. The new xorg
can't work with the old nvidia hence there should be a dependancy
preventing you from having the old nvidia with the new xorg. It's a
good thing when packages prevent you from doing broken things. The new
version of
Best course of action: stick to Intel graphics, or use the free nv driver.
The nv driver only works on some cards and intel cards are overpriced
POS that simply do not support some of more useful GL extensions.
AMD/ATi has recently released specs for their newer chips, and
promises to do so
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 06:25:05AM -0500, Robert Isaac wrote:
The nv driver only works on some cards and intel cards are overpriced
POS that simply do not support some of more useful GL extensions.
AMD/ATi has recently released specs for their newer chips, and
promises to do so soon for their
Adam Stiles wrote:
Best course of action: stick to Intel graphics, or use the free nv driver.
It is my understanding that the ATI (now part of AMD) cards were going to be
totally open?
http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3108
Thank you AMD - I sure hope our driver people take
AFAIK not all specs are available and
even the released ones have some holes. I'm sure these will be solved
over time but IMHO right _now_ the only fully supported Radeon family is
still the R200 generation. R300 and partly R400 is becoming pretty good
but it is not yet complete. Work on R500
You can make it yourself!
Get the package:
apt-get -d xserver-xorg-core
Create a directory to unpack that package:
mkdir /path/to/a/directory (example /tmp/xserver)
cd /tmp/xserver/
dpkg -e xserver-xorg-core
dpkg -x xserver-xorg-core /tmp/xserver
cd /tmp/xserver/DEBIAN
Edit the
Dear maintainers,
it is not possible, to install the newest xorg-version without upgrading to a
newer version of nvidia-glx. Yes, I know, this is because xorg 7.3 is using a
new ABI for Nvidias new binary part and you need xorg7.3 for the newer
drivers.
But because of these dependencies, I
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 07:47:46PM +0100, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Dear maintainers,
it is not possible, to install the newest xorg-version without upgrading to a
newer version of nvidia-glx. Yes, I know, this is because xorg 7.3 is using a
new ABI for Nvidias new binary part and you need
Am Mittwoch, 21. November 2007 schrieb Nicolas:
You can make it yourself!
Get the package:
apt-get -d xserver-xorg-core
Create a directory to unpack that package:
mkdir /path/to/a/directory (example /tmp/xserver)
cd /tmp/xserver/
dpkg -e xserver-xorg-core
dpkg -x
28 matches
Mail list logo
