Hi,
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 18:06 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
So anyone willing to test testing, esspecialy a fresh install, can
point apt to:
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 testing main contrib
non-free
I've been running this since shortly after the
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 09:45:31PM +0100, T.J. Zeeman wrote:
What is a bit odd is mtr-tiny. I got version .58-1.0.0.1.pure64
installed while both sid and sarge should already be at .67-1.
mtr does not build on amd64, which is why it's patched. Neither
the maintainer nor upstream has applied
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) writes:
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
the owner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I used the above sources.list with this image:
sid-amd64-netinst.iso11-Feb-2005 09:01 193M
I can't figure that one out:
apt-cache policy libc6 libc6-dev
libc6:
Dmitry Derjavin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Unfortunately current sid image doesn't allow to install on Asus A8V
Deluxe with PATA drives because of the bootloader problem described in
Another sata failure report and Grub problem? threads.
When it comes to installing grub press ESC or select
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
the owner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I used the above sources.list with this image:
sid-amd64-netinst.iso11-Feb-2005 09:01 193M
I can't figure that one out:
apt-cache policy libc6 libc6-dev
libc6:
2.3.2.ds1-20 0
1001
On Sun, Feb 13 2005 at 17:24, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
So anyone willing to test testing, esspecialy a fresh install, can
point apt to:
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 testing main
contrib non-free
This time I used this image:
sarge-amd64-netinst.iso
Dmitry Derjavin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Feb 13 2005 at 17:24, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
So anyone willing to test testing, esspecialy a fresh install, can
point apt to:
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 testing main
contrib non-free
This time I used this
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 06:06:15PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
So anyone willing to test testing, esspecialy a fresh install, can
point apt to:
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 testing main contrib
non-free
Hi,
Thank you very much for your work!
I pointed a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pete Harlan) writes:
I pointed a gcc-3.4 machine that hasn't been updated in a few months
to your archive, and started by trying to install libc6, which
resulted in this:
Unpacking replacement libc6 ...
dpkg: error processing
Goswin wrote:
I tried again and base config failed again on file
server config and manual package config. This could be
the same problem as below.
I don't understand what you mean here. I guess I have to
see it with my own eyes. I suspect some deb is stuck the
upload queue that base-config needs
Goswin wrote:
I exited the base config and tried dselect and there
were conflicts with dependency on libc6. The
libc6-dev depends on libc6 = 2.3.2.ds1-20 and libc6
was version 2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64.
I think that would be fixed in a day or two.
I think everything will work after sarge is
Goswin wrote already:
I will build a
new sarge image once the ~500MB remaining debs are uploaded.
Whoops! That would be great! Sorry for the previous trivia.
:-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the owner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Goswin wrote:
I tried again and base config failed again on file
server config and manual package config. This could be
the same problem as below.
I don't understand what you mean here. I guess I have to
see it with my own eyes. I suspect some deb is
the owner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That confirms sarge libc6-dev is at least 17 days later.
Both the 11Feb and 24Jan images must have been built from
sid containing the libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64 package
except sarge libc6-dev requires libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20. I would
need to try a netinst
the owner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Goswin wrote:
So anyone willing to test testing, esspecialy a fresh install, can
point apt to:
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 testing main
contrib non-free
OK. I remember some things from my first install so now I can check.
I
the owner wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for the installation, can DFS be used to install amd64-sarge?
I tried this last year using the same images from October.
The DFS takes more expertise to use than the Debian Installer.
The DFS boots into ram like a LiveCD unless you tell the kernel
to
Goswin wrote:
I used the above sources.list with this image:
sid-amd64-netinst.iso11-Feb-2005 09:01 193M Maybe that is the
wrong image to test the debian-pure64 testing. After reboot the
base config did not allow manual package selection.
I tried again and base config failed again on file
Goswin wrote:
So anyone willing to test testing, esspecialy a fresh
install, can point apt to:
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64
testing main contrib non-free
This time I used this image:
sarge-amd64-netinst.iso 15-Jan-2005 17:38 125M
The installer from 15
the owner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Goswin wrote:
I used the above sources.list with this image:
sid-amd64-netinst.iso11-Feb-2005 09:01 193M Maybe that is the
wrong image to test the debian-pure64 testing. After reboot the
base config did not allow manual package selection.
I tried
the owner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Goswin wrote:
So anyone willing to test testing, esspecialy a fresh install, can
point apt to:
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 testing main
contrib non-free
This time I used this image:
sarge-amd64-netinst.iso
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 testing main contrib non-free
In my boxes I already have such lines pointing to sarge, plus very high
pinning priorities for testing and/or stable, which ought to force
downgrade from sid if
Giacomo Mulas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 testing main contrib
non-free
In my boxes I already have such lines pointing to sarge, plus very
high pinning priorities for testing and/or
On 11 Feb 2005, 18:06, Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So anyone willing to test testing, esspecialy a fresh install, can
point apt to:
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 testing main contrib
non-free
Hopefully it will be soon propagated on mirrors too.
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
For a fresh install you need a netinst or monolithic CD as the
kernel-image udebs have not moved to sarge yet. The netboot would fail
to find the modules.
I'll try to test this on a few systems sometime soon.
As for the installation, can DFS be used to install
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for the installation, can DFS be used to install amd64-sarge?
I tried this last year using the same images from October.
The DFS takes more expertise to use than the Debian Installer.
The DFS boots into ram like a LiveCD unless you tell the kernel
to boot an existing
Goswin wrote:
So anyone willing to test testing, esspecialy a fresh install, can
point apt to:
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 testing main contrib non-free
OK. I remember some things from my first install so now I can check.
I used the above sources.list with this image:
26 matches
Mail list logo
