That shouldn't cause problems. In fact I saw a kernel package
maintainer ask someone to do that to test if a bug in 2.6.24 was still
in 2.6.25 and said it should install perfectly on lenny.
I'm using 2.6.25 pristine in lenny, no software or hardware issues until the
moment.
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
2.6.25 is a stable kernel, just as 2.6.24 was and 2.6.26 will be. The
old 'odd number development' stuff would have meant development would be
in 2.7.x kernels, but that hasn't been used for years.
OK, I understand I had the odd even part mixed up.
But what I still
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 14:16 -0500, Karl Schmidt wrote:
I would think that they would fix the 2.6.24 4G bug if that is what they will
release with?
Hell, 2.6.24 wouldn't even boot on my dual Opteron box. I seriously hope
they go ahead with 2.6.25.
Sid forever!
-s
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
2.6.25 has produced unbootable machines for me on both amd64 sid boxes
I've tried. In both cases, the solution involved changing
MODULES=most to
MODULES=dep in /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf (and rerunning
update-initramfs -u -k 2.6.25-2-amd64 or similar) but it didn't work
out of the box. I
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 02:16:57PM -0500, Karl Schmidt wrote:
OK, I understand I had the odd even part mixed up.
But what I still don't understand is why 2.6.25 isn't in lenny yet if it is
stable?
It hasn't been in unstable long enough to prove worthy. :) Or some
dependancy issues perhaps.
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 03:55:43PM -0500, Karl Schmidt wrote:
2.6.18-3-amd64, 2.6.22-3-amd64, or 2.6.24-1-amd64 ?
Well it currently has 2.6.24, so the first two are not an option.
2.6.25 is in sid, and likely to move to lenny soon. Certainly given the
IDE troubles
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 11:38:04AM -0500, Karl Schmidt wrote:
I have a system with 4G of ram that has the CDROM won't mount problem - I'm
wondering if they will back port the fix to 2.6.24-1-amd64? Perhaps I
should just move up to 2.6.25, but I don't want to introduce other problems.
If I
2.6.18-3-amd64, 2.6.22-3-amd64, or 2.6.24-1-amd64 ?
Karl Schmidt EMail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Transtronics, Inc. WEB http://xtronics.com
3209 West 9th StreetPh (785)
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 03:55:43PM -0500, Karl Schmidt wrote:
2.6.18-3-amd64, 2.6.22-3-amd64, or 2.6.24-1-amd64 ?
Well it currently has 2.6.24, so the first two are not an option.
2.6.25 is in sid, and likely to move to lenny soon. Certainly given the
IDE troubles 2.6.24 caused for some
9 matches
Mail list logo
