mozilla-browser

2006-10-31 Thread Douglas Tutty
I'm getting Etch setup on my new Athlon and am ready to install a full-featured web-browser. I can't find mozilla-browser listed although there is firefox. Is firefox full featured now? Is mozilla-browser dead or just not ready for testing? For lightweight stuff on my 486, I've always used

Re: mozilla-browser

2006-10-31 Thread Mike Reinehr
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 14:56, Douglas Tutty wrote: I'm getting Etch setup on my new Athlon and am ready to install a full-featured web-browser. I can't find mozilla-browser listed although there is firefox. Is firefox full featured now? Is mozilla-browser dead or just not ready

Re: mozilla-browser

2006-10-31 Thread Dean Hamstead
find mozilla-browser listed although there is firefox. Is firefox full featured now? Is mozilla-browser dead or just not ready for testing? For lightweight stuff on my 486, I've always used lynx (which does https) or dillo (which doesn't). For sites with java, I've fired up mozilla. I don't

Re: mozilla-browser

2006-10-31 Thread Cedar Cox
Mike Reinehr wrote: On Tuesday 31 October 2006 14:56, Douglas Tutty wrote: I'm getting Etch setup on my new Athlon and am ready to install a full-featured web-browser. I can't find mozilla-browser listed although there is firefox. Is firefox full featured now? Is mozilla-browser dead or just

Re: mozilla-browser

2006-10-31 Thread Douglas Tutty
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 03:53:24PM -0600, Mike Reinehr wrote: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=382956 RM: mozilla -- Ro??; abandoned upstream; unmaintained; RC-buggy Thanks. I don't see seamonkey so I go with firefox for now. Doug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Re: mozilla-browser

2006-10-31 Thread Robert Isaac
I thought it was renamed to Iceape due to trademark issues with Mozilla Corp. with firefox (tm) to be renamed to iceweasel. See: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=354622 On 10/31/06, Douglas Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 03:53:24PM -0600, Mike Reinehr

Re: Problems with mozilla-browser 1.7.12-1 in testing

2006-01-05 Thread Pete Harlan
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 01:48:34PM -0600, Pete Harlan wrote: Using testing, mozilla-browser 1.7.12-1 is unusable for me: It crashes after a half-dozen clicks from a web browser (if four clicks doesn't kill it, usually a back-button or two does). Reverting to 1.7.8-1 restores its health

Re: Problems with mozilla-browser 1.7.12-1 in testing

2005-11-21 Thread Santiago Kci
I have the same problem too... 2005/11/20, Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Jochen Voss wrote : Hi Pete, On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 01:48:34PM -0600, Pete Harlan wrote: Using testing, mozilla-browser 1.7.12-1 is unusable for me: It crashes after a half-dozen clicks from a web browser (if four

Re: Problems with mozilla-browser 1.7.12-1 in testing

2005-11-20 Thread Vincent
Jochen Voss wrote : Hi Pete, On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 01:48:34PM -0600, Pete Harlan wrote: Using testing, mozilla-browser 1.7.12-1 is unusable for me: It crashes after a half-dozen clicks from a web browser (if four clicks doesn't kill it, usually a back-button or two does). Mine (1.7.12-1

Problems with mozilla-browser 1.7.12-1 in testing

2005-11-17 Thread Pete Harlan
Using testing, mozilla-browser 1.7.12-1 is unusable for me: It crashes after a half-dozen clicks from a web browser (if four clicks doesn't kill it, usually a back-button or two does). Reverting to 1.7.8-1 restores its health. I've tried removing the .mozilla folder, but it doesn't help. Does

Re: Problems with mozilla-browser 1.7.12-1 in testing

2005-11-17 Thread Jochen Voss
Hi Pete, On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 01:48:34PM -0600, Pete Harlan wrote: Using testing, mozilla-browser 1.7.12-1 is unusable for me: It crashes after a half-dozen clicks from a web browser (if four clicks doesn't kill it, usually a back-button or two does). Mine (1.7.12-1 on unstable) is also