Could someone send me a grat sources.list for Debian Lenny(5.0.2)?it's
also good if you just send me a webpage where I can find the text.Is it
better if I use hungarian servers(my computer is in Hungary)?What are
the best servers to download?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Jenei Gábor:
Could someone send me a grat sources.list for Debian Lenny(5.0.2)?
What's wrong with yours? Are you missing specific packages? Is your
mirror not able to saturate your internet connection?
it's
also good if you just send me a webpage where I can find the text.Is it
better if I
Hello Jenei,
you must already have one in /etc/apt .
Otherwise, the question is: how have you installed Debian on your box ?
Jerome
Jenei Gábor wrote:
Could someone send me a grat sources.list for Debian Lenny(5.0.2)?it's
also good if you just send me a webpage where I can find the text.Is
doesn't
suppert the G network for AR5211.Is this right?With madwifi it works
fine also with WPA.thanks for the hungarianserver adresses,they're quick
yet:)
You could use apt-setup (just like the installer probably does) to add
things to your sources.list, or maybe read the man page
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 09:24:32AM +0200, Jenei Gábor wrote:
Could someone send me a grat sources.list for Debian Lenny(5.0.2)?it's
also good if you just send me a webpage where I can find the text.Is it
better if I use hungarian servers(my computer is in Hungary)?What are
the best servers
On Mon, Jan 03, 2000 at 07:14:51AM -0500, hend...@topoi.pooq.com wrote:
Here's mine. I'm in Canada; I use a local Canadian site. I also
ibclude a site that contains altered kernels that are needed for my
eeepc, and a site that may or may not contain a Modula 3 distribution
(The modula 3
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009, Jenei Gábor wrote:
Could someone send me a grat sources.list for Debian Lenny(5.0.2)?it's
also good if you just send me a webpage where I can find the text.Is it
better if I use hungarian servers(my computer is in Hungary)?What are
the best servers to download?
you
the repository
of sid in sources.list) ? Or are all versions in experimental ignored, as
experimental is handled in a special way ?
...similar to that, you know what I mean.
And yes, Jochen, I know the matter of dist-upgrade, and I always say:
upgrade is normal, but dist-upgrade is the intelligent
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:40:56AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Actualy you are verry wrong there. Not in what it is supposed to do
but in what actually happens and why update is a good idea.
As you say will do things involving adding or removing packages.
Unfortunately it is not
, when doing apt-get
dist-upgrade (like it behave, if I am running testing and add the
repository of sid in sources.list) ? Or are all versions in experimental
ignored, as experimental is handled in a special way ?
I certainly am not an expert at package management. In fact, I think
maintaining
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) writes:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:40:56AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Actualy you are verry wrong there. Not in what it is supposed to do
but in what actually happens and why update is a good idea.
As you say will do things involving adding or
in
experimental, are they automatically installed, when doing apt-get
dist-upgrade (like it behave, if I am running testing and add the repository
of sid in sources.list) ? Or are all versions in experimental ignored, as
experimental is handled in a special way ?
The correct answer has already been
Hi all,
just a question:
adding an experimental source to the sources list (just to install a special
application from this), will an aptitude upgrade or apt-get upgrade
overwrite ALL installed packages ?
Thanks for your help.
Cheers
Hans
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 18:35, Hans-J. Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
adding an experimental source to the sources list (just to install a special
application from this), will an aptitude upgrade or apt-get upgrade
overwrite ALL installed packages ?
No, you need to explicitly request to
On 12/02/08 11:39, Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 18:35, Hans-J. Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
adding an experimental source to the sources list (just to install a special
application from this), will an aptitude upgrade or apt-get upgrade
overwrite ALL installed packages ?
No,
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 06:35:59PM +0100, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
just a question:
adding an experimental source to the sources list (just to install a special
application from this), will an aptitude upgrade or apt-get upgrade
overwrite ALL installed packages ?
upgrade doesn't do anything
Lennart Sorensen:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 06:35:59PM +0100, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
just a question:
adding an experimental source to the sources list (just to install a special
application from this), will an aptitude upgrade or apt-get upgrade
overwrite ALL installed packages ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) writes:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 06:35:59PM +0100, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
just a question:
adding an experimental source to the sources list (just to install a special
application from this), will an aptitude upgrade or apt-get upgrade
overwrite ALL
Jochen Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Of course, if you always check apt(itude)'s output before confirming its
actions, you don't break your system either. But it is never a mistake
to try the safe alternative first.
Which is a lot shorter and easier to read once the safe-upgrade
packages
(although plenty of attention is given to pppoe), setserial
isn't included in the base config to assist with modem port detection,
so consequently, there's no access to a mirror and the only thing that
ends up in the sources.list file is the cdrom path.
I could probably figure things out
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 02:01:37PM +0800, David Palmer wrote:
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 15:26 +1000, Alex Samad wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:04:46AM +0800, David Palmer wrote:
[snip]
Right!
So there's no need to include an amd64 rider in there at all?
Apt picks it up automagically?
you
,
so consequently, there's no access to a mirror and the only thing that
ends up in the sources.list file is the cdrom path.
I could probably figure things out but I'm a bit doubtful on the syntax
employed when specifying the paths in the /etc/apt/sources.list edit.
I've searched everywhere fron
isn't included in the base config to assist with modem port detection,
so consequently, there's no access to a mirror and the only thing that
ends up in the sources.list file is the cdrom path.
I could probably figure things out but I'm a bit doubtful on the syntax
employed when specifying
Dave Stevens:
W: Couldn't stat source package list http://debian.yorku.ca etch/non-free
Packages
(/var/lib/apt/lists/debian.yorku.ca_debian_dists_etch_non-free_binary-amd64_Packages)
- stat (2 No such file or directory)
This probably means that you need to run 'aptitude update' (or apt-get
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 01:33:34 pm Max Alekseyev wrote:
Add non-free section to you sources.list, i.e. change
deb http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/ etch main
to
deb http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/ etch main non-free
and install package 'unrar' which is the latest (but non-free) version
On November 17, 2007 04:33:12 pm Dave Stevens wrote:
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 01:33:34 pm Max Alekseyev wrote:
Add non-free section to you sources.list, i.e. change
deb http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/ etch main
to
deb http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/ etch main non-free
and install
a line to /etc/apt/sources.list as suggested at that page but
get error warnings when starting synaptic. The error text is:
W: Couldn't stat source package list
http://http.us.debian.org sarge/main Packages
(/var/lib/apt/lists/http.us.debian.org_debian_dists_sarge_main_binary-amd64_Packages)
- stat (2
Add non-free section to you sources.list, i.e. change
deb http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/ etch main
to
deb http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/ etch main non-free
and install package 'unrar' which is the latest (but non-free) version
of unrar, supporting RAR archives ver 3.x
Max
On Nov 14, 2007 10:28
a line to /etc/apt/sources.list as suggested at that page but
get error warnings when starting synaptic. The net effect is that searching
for unrar gives only the already installed unrar-free. I have the .deb
package for unrar but installing it fails due to a dependency error.
Can someone point me
to get appropriate access for synaptic.
I went to:
http://packages.debian.org/sid/unrar/amd64/download
and tried adding a line to /etc/apt/sources.list as suggested at that page but
get error warnings when starting synaptic. The net effect is that searching
for unrar gives only the already
Dave Stevens:
I went to:
http://packages.debian.org/sid/unrar/amd64/download
and tried adding a line to /etc/apt/sources.list as suggested at that page
Don't force us to follow your links if you could easily provide the
necessary information (i.e. the contents of the sources.list) in your
Jochen Schulz, Robert Isaac,
Thanks for your info. The Debian computer is not mine and I was not at it when
writing. I apologize for the scant information, but finding out what
information to provide was part of my purpose. I'll write again after trying
your suggestions and will provide more
://packages.debian.org/sid/unrar/amd64/download
and tried adding a line to /etc/apt/sources.list as suggested at that page
but get error warnings when starting synaptic. The net effect is that
searching for unrar gives only the already installed unrar-free. I have the
.deb package for unrar but installing
On 12/8/06, Manolo Díaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Richardson wrote:
If I were to put 'etch' instead of 'testing' in my sources.list, like so
deb http://sluglug.ucsc.edu/debian/ etch main
on a new install, will I see any difference when etch becomes the new
stable? Sorry for the dumb
If I were to put 'etch' instead of 'testing' in my sources.list, like so
deb http://sluglug.ucsc.edu/debian/ etch main
on a new install, will I see any difference when etch becomes the new
stable? Sorry for the dumb question, but I've always put 'stable' or
'unstable' rather than 'sarge
Matt Richardson wrote:
If I were to put 'etch' instead of 'testing' in my sources.list, like so
deb http://sluglug.ucsc.edu/debian/ etch main
on a new install, will I see any difference when etch becomes the new
stable? Sorry for the dumb question, but I've always put 'stable' or
'unstable
Where can I find sources.list repository for gnome-bluetooth and
gnome-phone-manager packages?
TIA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I have been using the following since I installed amd64-etch-testing half a
year ago:
deb ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-amd64/ testing main
deb-src ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-amd64/ testing main
Now the testing branch does not work anymore, apt cannot find the files on
that mirror.
Leo Bogert wrote:
Hello,
I have been using the following since I installed amd64-etch-testing half a
year ago:
deb ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-amd64/ testing main
deb-src ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-amd64/ testing main
Now the testing branch does not work anymore, apt cannot find the
Leo Bogert wrote:
What is the correct URL for the testing packages?
AMD64 etch should be in ftp.de.debian.org/debian, just like sid.
Chris.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Christoph Anton Mitterer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Leo Bogert wrote:
What is the correct URL for the testing packages?
AMD64 etch should be in ftp.de.debian.org/debian, just like sid.
Chris.
Does etch equal to testing or unstable? And what is sid?
Leo Bogert wrote:
Manolo Díaz wrote:
Leo Bogert wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Christoph Anton Mitterer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Leo Bogert wrote:
What is the correct URL for the testing packages?
AMD64 etch should be in ftp.de.debian.org/debian, just like sid.
Chris.
Does
Why with amd64 (if I can still use this label) for dual opteron
#aptitude update
continues to report to be unable to contact sources when the sources.list is:
deb http://security.debian.org etch/updates main contrib non-free
# deb-src http://security.debian.org etch/updates main contrib
deb
Hello Francesco,
for which source did you get connection errors? ftp.d.o?
You could try a mirror instead.
Kind regards,
Marko
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Marko:
Just to replay your request in detail, I have rerun with the same sources.list
#aptitude update
this was about one hour (8.00 UTC) after the erroneous report and gave no
errors. It read the non-source security and Fetched 2B in 1s (2B/s).
Sorry for my previous e-mail
El Miércoles, 31 de Mayo de 2006 07:23, Dean Hamstead escribió:
ahh ok, so unstable amd64 is now in the main arcvices
For next year SoC, why not a script to analyze messages to mailing lists and
if the topic has been so repeated during last weeks and months, filter
it? :PP
--
Rafael
time to update the amd64 page then ;PPP
Dean
Rafael Rodríguez wrote:
El Miércoles, 31 de Mayo de 2006 07:23, Dean Hamstead escribió:
ahh ok, so unstable amd64 is now in the main arcvices
For next year SoC, why not a script to analyze messages to mailing lists and
if the topic has been
Dean Hamstead wrote:
enlightenment is awesome. nor bars or docks or loading bays etc
just screen real estate.
Dean
I would recommend xfce, it's a lot lighter, faster and works just
fine, if colours and things are a must, try enlightenment...
IceWM rocks too. Most of the benefits of
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 09:35:08PM -0500, Igor TAmara wrote:
Hey, if you want that, just use ion2 or ion3 , nobody will want to touch
your session :) , I use it all the time and is the fastest and
productive I've ever used. Fast, keyboard friendly and mouse users
refuse to use it ;)
How do
Hi,
Lennart On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 09:35:08PM -0500, Igor TAmara wrote:
Lennart Hey, if you want that, just use ion2 or ion3 , nobody will want to
touch
Lennart your session :) , I use it all the time and is the fastest and
Lennart productive I've ever used. Fast, keyboard friendly and
and opteron user.
I have a couple of issues; and this message is confined to tuning my
sources.list:
### deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Etch_ - Official Snapshot amd64
Binary-1 (20060314)]/ etch main
deb http://mirror.espri.arizona.edu/debian-amd64/debian/ etch main
deb-src http
intel user of debian;
and I am a brand new 64-bit and opteron user.
I have a couple of issues; and this message is confined to tuning my
sources.list:
### deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Etch_ - Official Snapshot
amd64 Binary-1 (20060314)]/ etch main
deb http
Hi,
helices [1] Both of the arizona.edu lines were added during installation.
helices
helices What other sources should I use? I want to be careful, and NOT mix
helices into this system things that will confuse and/or break apt. Also,
helices as much as possible, the reason I
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 03:54:56PM +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
There was a change in sources.list some weeks ago. Now use the same entries
as
in 32-bit-debian. Your apt knows, which system you have.
http://something/debian-amd64/ etch main
is obsolete now.
use
http
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 04:35:58PM +0200, Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 03:54:56PM +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
There was a change in sources.list some weeks ago. Now use the same entries
as
in 32-bit-debian. Your apt knows, which system you have.
http://something
read Sarge amd64 has
been declared official.
Am I save with below /etc/apt/sources.list for time being?
deb ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-amd64/debian/ stable main
deb-src ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-amd64/debian/ stable main
deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main
deb http
CLI and the internet ;
Please, let me be clear: I am a long time 32-bit intel user of debian;
and I am a brand new 64-bit and opteron user.
I have a couple of issues; and this message is confined to tuning my
sources.list:
### deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Etch_ - Official Snapshot
* Scott Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006:05:30:10:40:39-0400] scribed:
I added the corresponding sarge repositories
## sarge
deb http://mirror.espri.arizona.edu/debian-amd64/debian/ sarge main non-free
contrib
deb-src http://mirror.espri.arizona.edu/debian-amd64/debian/ sarge main
non-free
am a long time 32-bit intel user of debian;
and I am a brand new 64-bit and opteron user.
I have a couple of issues; and this message is confined to tuning my
sources.list:
snip /
deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main
# deb http://security.debian.org/ testing/updates
* Scott Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006:05:30:10:40:39-0400] scribed:
I added the corresponding sarge repositories
## sarge
deb http://mirror.espri.arizona.edu/debian-amd64/debian/ sarge main non-free
contrib
deb-src http://mirror.espri.arizona.edu/debian-amd64/debian/ sarge main
non-free
preferences in the config
file. I tried that before, but was having dependency issues. Now I keep both
stable and testing in sources.list and use the -t flag to determine what I
want to install.
Mostly, I use -t stable for kde and related things, and go with etch for
system utilities, etc.
Scott
enlightenment is awesome. nor bars or docks or loading bays etc
just screen real estate.
Dean
I would recommend xfce, it's a lot lighter, faster and works just fine, if
colours and things are a must, try enlightenment...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Dean Hamstead wrote:
enlightenment is awesome. nor bars or docks or loading bays etc
just screen real estate.
Properly configured, Enlightenment is a great way to keep people from
using your computer until you show them how. ;) That's what I do -- no
need for a screensaver password.
you clearly don't have a 16 year old sister ;)
Dean
Corey Hickey wrote:
Dean Hamstead wrote:
enlightenment is awesome. nor bars or docks or loading bays etc
just screen real estate.
Properly configured, Enlightenment is a great way to keep people from
using your computer until you show
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 04:51:52PM -0500 helices said:
* On 2006:05:30:08:45:45-0500 I, helices [EMAIL PROTECTED], scribed:
OK, I am making progress, in understanding and in practice, with 64-bit
packages.
However, I am still unclear: what is
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 10:12:18AM +1000, Sam Varghese wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 04:51:52PM -0500 helices said:
* On 2006:05:30:08:45:45-0500 I, helices [EMAIL PROTECTED], scribed:
OK, I am making progress, in understanding and in
* Alexander Samad [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006:05:31:11:00:11+1000] scribed:
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 10:12:18AM +1000, Sam Varghese wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 04:51:52PM -0500 helices said:
* On 2006:05:30:08:45:45-0500 I, helices [EMAIL
Hey, if you want that, just use ion2 or ion3 , nobody will want to touch
your session :) , I use it all the time and is the fastest and
productive I've ever used. Fast, keyboard friendly and mouse users
refuse to use it ;)
Corey Dean Hamstead wrote:
Corey enlightenment is awesome. nor bars or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 11:37:44AM +1000 Dean Hamstead said:
speaking of sources.list, is there a good etch/sid (unstable testing)
mirror in australia?
i was using mirror.pacific.net.au (huray unmetered downloads) but they
seem to now be only
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 12:36:32PM +1000, Sam Varghese wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 11:37:44AM +1000 Dean Hamstead said:
speaking of sources.list, is there a good etch/sid (unstable testing)
mirror in australia?
i was using
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 08:32:14PM -0500, helices wrote:
* Alexander Samad [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006:05:31:11:00:11+1000] scribed:
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 10:12:18AM +1000, Sam Varghese wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 04:51:52PM -0500
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 11:37:44AM +1000, Dean Hamstead wrote:
speaking of sources.list, is there a good etch/sid (unstable testing)
mirror in australia?
i was using mirror.pacific.net.au (huray unmetered downloads) but they
seem to now be only mirroring sarge for amd64 (aka stable
ahh ok, so unstable amd64 is now in the main arcvices
Dean
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 11:37:44AM +1000, Dean Hamstead wrote:
speaking of sources.list, is there a good etch/sid (unstable testing)
mirror in australia?
i was using mirror.pacific.net.au (huray unmetered
that populated enough to
be usable.
Are there any problems involved in *adding* a line like this to an
existing sources.list, rather than replacing an existing one?
That would result in different builds of the same package and version
to be available to apt. Often that results in apt
Russ Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In light of the recent announcement The Future of AMD64 Port on this
list, I have attempted
to update my sources.list file for Apt. I have attached the file for
reference. I have tried various
But then you have only the old mirror in there and the new
Russ Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
bzip2: Compressed file ends unexpectedly;
perhaps it is corrupted? *Possible* reason follows.
bzip2: Inappropriate ioctl for device
Input file = (stdin), output file = (stdout)
Yeah, that should be. Maybe you tried in the middle of a mirror
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are there any problems involved in *adding* a line like this to an
existing sources.list, rather than replacing an existing one?
I'm (still) using a hybrid setup along those lines; it seems to work
fine, though you need to take some care to ensure that you always get
fredag 21 april 2006 04:17 skrev Stephen Woodbridge:
Ok, I'm drawing a blank, where do I find a list of the main mirrors.
So I have sarge/stable pointing at the debian-amd64 mirrors, is this
correct?
And I don't reference testing at all, only sid.
I believe for sid, the correct sources are:
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 08:21:18AM +0200, Anders Ellenshøj Andersen wrote:
fredag 21 april 2006 04:17 skrev Stephen Woodbridge:
Ok, I'm drawing a blank, where do I find a list of the main mirrors.
So I have sarge/stable pointing at the debian-amd64 mirrors, is this
correct?
And I
fredag 21 april 2006 08:53 skrev Eugen Leitl:
I have
deb ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-amd64/debian/ stable main
deb-src ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-amd64/debian/ stable main
in mine. This is correct for stable, right?
Hmm.. As far as I know, there shouldn't even exist at stable version
Anders Ellenshøj Andersen wrote:
fredag 21 april 2006 08:53 skrev Eugen Leitl:
I have
deb ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-amd64/debian/ stable main
deb-src ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-amd64/debian/ stable main
in mine. This is correct for stable, right?
Hmm.. As far as I know,
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 10:33:51AM +0200, Anders Ellenshøj Andersen wrote:
fredag 21 april 2006 08:53 skrev Eugen Leitl:
I have
deb ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-amd64/debian/ stable main
deb-src ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-amd64/debian/ stable main
in mine. This is correct for
Try
deb http://amd64.cc.mirrors.debian.net/debian sid main contrib non-free
etch still needs time for packages to drift into it from the official
sid. It will be some more weeks/month before that populated enough to
be usable.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anders Ellenshøj Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
fredag 21 april 2006 04:17 skrev Stephen Woodbridge:
Ok, I'm drawing a blank, where do I find a list of the main mirrors.
So I have sarge/stable pointing at the debian-amd64 mirrors, is this
correct?
And I don't reference testing at all,
to
be usable.
Are there any problems involved in *adding* a line like this to an
existing sources.list, rather than replacing an existing one?
-- hendrik
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED
In light of the recent announcement The Future of AMD64 Port on this
list, I have attempted
to update my sources.list file for Apt. I have attached the file for
reference. I have tried various
combinations of the mirrors in the file in an attempt to eliminate error
messages returned
On Friday 21 April 2006 20:39, Russ Cook wrote:
In light of the recent announcement The Future of AMD64 Port on this
list, I have attempted
to update my sources.list file for Apt. I have attached the file for
reference. I have tried various
combinations of the mirrors in the file
Hi all,
my sources.list file is what I put together in December. With the amd64
getting main streamed, Will I need to change it? Has it changed yet? I
noticed some unstable packages at http://packages.debian.org/unstable/
that don't show up when I apt-cache search for them!
Thanks,
-Steve
Your sid references need to revert to the main mirrors, afaic the
testing is still on the amd64 mirrors only.
On 4/20/06, Stephen Woodbridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
my sources.list file is what I put together in December. With the amd64
getting main streamed, Will I need to change
to revert to the main mirrors, afaic the
testing is still on the amd64 mirrors only.
On 4/20/06, Stephen Woodbridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
my sources.list file is what I put together in December. With the amd64
getting main streamed, Will I need to change it? Has it changed yet? I
noticed
, and that some packages were simply not available via the
default sources.list, for instance I was initally unable to install
make (404 error). After some fiddling and googling about I ended up
with the following:
--8--
#
# deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Etch_ - Official Snapshot amd64 Binary-1
Hans-J. Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello all,
in my sources.list is still the following entry, which was some time ago
necessary, to get some 32-bit-applications (i.e. openoffice) running (thanks
to Goswin von Brederlow).
Is this entry still necessary ? This is the entry
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 10:20:22AM +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Hello all,
in my sources.list is still the following entry, which was some time ago
necessary, to get some 32-bit-applications (i.e. openoffice) running (thanks
to Goswin von Brederlow).
Is this entry still necessary
Hello all,
in my sources.list is still the following entry, which was some time ago
necessary, to get some 32-bit-applications (i.e. openoffice) running (thanks
to Goswin von Brederlow).
Is this entry still necessary ? This is the entry:
--
# Goswins
deb file:///var/lib/amd64-archive
Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Hello all,
in my sources.list is still the following entry, which was some time ago
necessary, to get some 32-bit-applications (i.e. openoffice) running (thanks
to Goswin von Brederlow).
Is this entry still necessary ? This is the entry:
--
# Goswins
deb file
Hi :)
Does anybody have experience with using hrtimers on debian amd64?
I have found this page:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers
Did anyone give it a try?
Best regards
Michal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hello people :)
Can anyone please advice me on what entry should I include in my
/etc/apt/sources.list file, if I want to install mplayer for amd64
testing (aka etch)?
right now my sources.list looks like this:
deb http://amd64.debian.net/debian/ testing main contrib non-free
deb-src http
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 02:26:02PM +0100, Michal Hajek wrote:
Hello people :)
Can anyone please advice me on what entry should I include in my
/etc/apt/sources.list file, if I want to install mplayer for amd64
testing (aka etch)?
right now my sources.list looks like this:
deb http
Hello :)
* Lennart Sorensen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051128 16:00]:
The index.html at that location has a link to:
deb http://spello.sscnet.ucla.edu/marillat/ sid main
It only has sarge and sid though, no etch.
^
what is than a correct debian way to get
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 04:10:12PM +0100, Michal Hajek wrote:
Hello :)
* Lennart Sorensen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051128 16:00]:
The index.html at that location has a link to:
deb http://spello.sscnet.ucla.edu/marillat/ sid main
It only has sarge and sid though, no etch.
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
