On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 7:16 PM qorg11 wrote:
>
> this is a test please ignore
Try alt.test, https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/alt.test
this is a test please ignore
.
Is there an x32 porterbox I could test on? Or would it be possible to
manually retry the build on the x32 buildd with core dumps enabled to
gain some insight into the problem? Other ideas, maybe?
--
Thanks,
Feri
!
--
/usr/bin/ctest --force-new-ctest-process -j2
Test project /<>/leatherman-1.4.0+dfsg/obj-x86_64-linux-gnux32
Start 1: leatherman tests
1/1 Test #1: leatherman tests .***Exception: SegFault 0.
lately:
Testing /<>/guile-2.2-2.2.3+1/meta/guile ...
with GUILE_LOAD_PATH=/<>/guile-2.2-2.2.3+1/test-suite
E: Build killed with signal TERM after 600 minutes of inactivity
Could you please take a look?
Thanks!
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debi
Hello:
I am looking for how to test the cuda memory bandwdth for GTX (GTX-680)
with cuda tools in amd64 wheezy.
I tried GNU CUDA-Z, however it did not find libXrender.so.1. I guess its is
looking for it from ia32-libs (as that lib is present in my 64 libs), which
is not installed on my servers
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 03:06:08PM +0100, Francesco Pietra wrote:
Hello:
I am looking for how to test the cuda memory bandwdth for GTX (GTX-680)
with cuda tools in amd64 wheezy.
I tried GNU CUDA-Z, however it did not find libXrender.so.1. I guess its is
looking for it from ia32-libs
Sorry but testing to see if still subscribed. Am seeing on activity
since the 17th June.
Whit
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hi Simon,
After upgrading you may have option for grub legacy or grub2 for use.
Please check which one you are using.You have to use command
'upgrade-from-grub-legacy' to use grub2 permanently.
grub2 use file /boot/grub/grub.cfg and legacy file /boot/grub/menu.lst
compare to use right device for
Sorry, I have been able to solve the problem in the mean time. For some
reason one of the grub commands called by the script that creates grub.cfg
failed. It was the one retrieving the id of the HDD. I changed the grub.cfg
file manually to use a /dev/ device instead of uuid and my laptop booted
a matter of opinion), i
was merely stating the fact that you weren't following Debian's code
of conduct for its mailling lists. If you needed to do a test you
could a) reply to a thread that interested you (with relevant
information to that thread) and, in the body, ask that someone confirm
they had
I'm glad the problems with list access have been worked out, and that the
code of conduct has been reiterated for anyone who may not have been aware
of it. Now that everyone's had their say, can this conversation please end?
This could quickly degenerate into a series of shushes to loud
On Tuesday 10 March 2009 18:02:22 you wrote:
Oh wow ... aren't you also the guy who invented velcro ?
Yep. Velcro was a spin off from something else I was working on.
Which was Goretex. Which was patented by Mr Gore.
Do you think we can get back to some AMD64 stuff now ?
--
Richard
This one time, at band camp, Manolo Díaz said:
You (or your ISP provider?) are launching emails from the googlemail.com
domain using the host terra.adsl24.co.uk
That may or may not be a problem, depending on whether or not they check
for SPF or use other methods to check for forgery.
Asking
On Tuesday 10 March 2009 19:13:55 Stephen Gran wrote:
That may or may not be a problem, depending on whether or not they
check for SPF or use other methods to check for forgery.
My own ISP have sorted this out now by putting me into their exim.conf
file (just me). I seem to have sold an EeePC
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:13:55 +
Stephen Gran sg...@debian.org wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Manolo Díaz said:
You (or your ISP provider?) are launching emails from the
googlemail.com domain using the host terra.adsl24.co.uk
That may or may not be a problem, depending on whether
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
Please do not ignore.
Nuno Magalhães
LU#484677
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Please ignore
--
Richard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Thursday 05 March 2009 14:35:24 Nuno Magalhães wrote:
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
Please do not ignore.
I've been trying to send mail to Debian lists for more than a month.
The Debian lists admin has ignored my e-mail. This has been coming
back..
Recipient address
that I don't own a amd64 cpu pc, but do you think it is
possible to test the package with a tool like VMWare (the #3 release, as
they say, provides support for amd64)?
I am going to plan a help on your amd64, once I download and installed it
on my pc.
Let me try. Maybe the debian-amd64 list
On Thu, September 28, 2006 10:43 am, Stefano Melchior said:
[...]
I am going to plan a help on your amd64, once I download and installed it
on my pc.
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-uml-devel/2006-September/000297.html
english is not perfect: I meant to say that the amd64 guys can
state if the vmware use can be enough to avoid to have a amd64 cpu pc to
test uml. If at the moment I can not afford it, can I emulate the arch
with vmware? this is the question.
Cheers
SteX
--
Stefano Melchior, GPG key = D52DF829 - [EMAIL
/09/msg00043.html
sorry, my english is not perfect: I meant to say that the amd64 guys can
state if the vmware use can be enough to avoid to have a amd64 cpu pc to
test uml. If at the moment I can not afford it, can I emulate the arch
with vmware? this is the question.
VMWare can only
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 12:15:51PM +0100, Jo Shields wrote:
Dear Jo,
sorry, my english is not perfect: I meant to say that the amd64 guys can
state if the vmware use can be enough to avoid to have a amd64 cpu pc to
test uml. If at the moment I can not afford it, can I emulate the arch
to
test uml. If at the moment I can not afford it, can I emulate the arch
with vmware? this is the question.
VMWare can only emulate an AMD64 system on a modern AMD64 host (e.g. an
Intel processor with EM64T and VT support)
thus my plan to emulate this arch on a Intel Centrino was wrong a priori
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 07:23:06AM -0500, Jaime Ochoa Malagón wrote:
Dear all,
I belive qemu, but
well, thanks for the suggestion:
http://www.netbsd.org/Ports/emulators.html
http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/qemu/
http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/qemu/status.html
it seems to confirm what you
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 08:19:34PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
Hello,
I'm looking for help in building and testing the amd64 version of
user-mode-linux and rootstrap packages to be able to ship them in Etch.
great, I managed to put my hands on and amd64 system and built/tested
rootstrap and
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 08:19:34PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
[...]
Building them should be as easy as adding the Architecture to
debian/control and run dpkg-buildpackage.
herm, you also need config.amd64 from SVN for user-mode-linux, attached
for convenience.
thanks again
--
mattia
:wq!
#
Hello,
I'm looking for help in building and testing the amd64 version of
user-mode-linux and rootstrap packages to be able to ship them in Etch.
Building them should be as easy as adding the Architecture to
debian/control and run dpkg-buildpackage.
The first test I'd like to see successfully
builds for all types of CD images are now available. A fair
amount of changes were needed, so please test CD-based installs.
All this does mean that the current lowmem levels need serious review
for all architectures. The good news is that memory requirement for a
bare install (lowmem level 2
Hi,
I have installed wpa_supplicant for my wireless connection.
Is there a way to test it? I can use internet normally, but I'm not
sure that it's using wpa (I have read this tutorial:
http://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=399787view=getlastpost).
Could be good a sniffer like ethereal
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 09:23:59AM +, antonio giulio wrote:
I have installed wpa_supplicant for my wireless connection.
Is there a way to test it? I can use internet normally, but I'm not
sure that it's using wpa (I have read this tutorial:
http://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic
http://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=399787view=getlastpost).
Could be good a sniffer like ethereal? And if so, how test it?
Just configure the access point to only allow WPA, and see if you
connect at all. I am sure there is a better way but not sure what. You
certainly can't
On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 10:47 -0400, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
Could I request someone to test for the presence of a G77 bug on 64-bit
platforms? Please install g77 and gcc on a *Sid* machine and ensure
that gcc is a symlink to gcc-4.0
Hi,
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 18:06 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
So anyone willing to test testing, esspecialy a fresh install, can
point apt to:
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 testing main contrib
non-free
I've been running this since shortly after
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 09:45:31PM +0100, T.J. Zeeman wrote:
What is a bit odd is mtr-tiny. I got version .58-1.0.0.1.pure64
installed while both sid and sarge should already be at .67-1.
mtr does not build on amd64, which is why it's patched. Neither
the maintainer nor upstream has applied
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) writes:
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
the owner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I used the above sources.list with this image:
sid-amd64-netinst.iso11-Feb-2005 09:01 193M
I can't figure that one out:
apt-cache policy libc6 libc6-dev
libc6:
Dmitry Derjavin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Unfortunately current sid image doesn't allow to install on Asus A8V
Deluxe with PATA drives because of the bootloader problem described in
Another sata failure report and Grub problem? threads.
When it comes to installing grub press ESC or select
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
the owner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I used the above sources.list with this image:
sid-amd64-netinst.iso11-Feb-2005 09:01 193M
I can't figure that one out:
apt-cache policy libc6 libc6-dev
libc6:
2.3.2.ds1-20 0
1001
On Sun, Feb 13 2005 at 17:24, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
So anyone willing to test testing, esspecialy a fresh install, can
point apt to:
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 testing main
contrib non-free
This time I used this image:
sarge-amd64-netinst.iso 15
Dmitry Derjavin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Feb 13 2005 at 17:24, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
So anyone willing to test testing, esspecialy a fresh install, can
point apt to:
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 testing main
contrib non-free
This time I used
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 06:06:15PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
So anyone willing to test testing, esspecialy a fresh install, can
point apt to:
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 testing main contrib
non-free
Hi,
Thank you very much for your work!
I pointed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pete Harlan) writes:
I pointed a gcc-3.4 machine that hasn't been updated in a few months
to your archive, and started by trying to install libc6, which
resulted in this:
Unpacking replacement libc6 ...
dpkg: error processing
Goswin wrote:
I tried again and base config failed again on file
server config and manual package config. This could be
the same problem as below.
I don't understand what you mean here. I guess I have to
see it with my own eyes. I suspect some deb is stuck the
upload queue that base-config needs
Goswin wrote:
I exited the base config and tried dselect and there
were conflicts with dependency on libc6. The
libc6-dev depends on libc6 = 2.3.2.ds1-20 and libc6
was version 2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64.
I think that would be fixed in a day or two.
I think everything will work after sarge is
Goswin wrote already:
I will build a
new sarge image once the ~500MB remaining debs are uploaded.
Whoops! That would be great! Sorry for the previous trivia.
:-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the owner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Goswin wrote:
I tried again and base config failed again on file
server config and manual package config. This could be
the same problem as below.
I don't understand what you mean here. I guess I have to
see it with my own eyes. I suspect some deb is
the owner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That confirms sarge libc6-dev is at least 17 days later.
Both the 11Feb and 24Jan images must have been built from
sid containing the libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64 package
except sarge libc6-dev requires libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20. I would
need to try a netinst
the owner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Goswin wrote:
So anyone willing to test testing, esspecialy a fresh install, can
point apt to:
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 testing main
contrib non-free
OK. I remember some things from my first install so now I can check.
I
the owner wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for the installation, can DFS be used to install amd64-sarge?
I tried this last year using the same images from October.
The DFS takes more expertise to use than the Debian Installer.
The DFS boots into ram like a LiveCD unless you tell the kernel
to
Goswin wrote:
I used the above sources.list with this image:
sid-amd64-netinst.iso11-Feb-2005 09:01 193M Maybe that is the
wrong image to test the debian-pure64 testing. After reboot the
base config did not allow manual package selection.
I tried again and base config failed again on file
Goswin wrote:
So anyone willing to test testing, esspecialy a fresh
install, can point apt to:
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64
testing main contrib non-free
This time I used this image:
sarge-amd64-netinst.iso 15-Jan-2005 17:38 125M
The installer from 15
the owner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Goswin wrote:
I used the above sources.list with this image:
sid-amd64-netinst.iso11-Feb-2005 09:01 193M Maybe that is the
wrong image to test the debian-pure64 testing. After reboot the
base config did not allow manual package selection.
I tried
the owner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Goswin wrote:
So anyone willing to test testing, esspecialy a fresh install, can
point apt to:
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 testing main
contrib non-free
This time I used this image:
sarge-amd64-netinst.iso 15-Jan
of 14904 (for
main) debs are uploaded with more on the way.
So anyone willing to test testing, esspecialy a fresh install, can
point apt to:
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 testing main contrib
non-free
For a fresh install you need a netinst or monolithic CD as the
kernel
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 testing main contrib non-free
In my boxes I already have such lines pointing to sarge, plus very high
pinning priorities for testing and/or stable, which ought to force
downgrade from sid if
Giacomo Mulas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 testing main contrib
non-free
In my boxes I already have such lines pointing to sarge, plus very
high pinning priorities for testing and/or
On 11 Feb 2005, 18:06, Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So anyone willing to test testing, esspecialy a fresh install, can
point apt to:
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 testing main contrib
non-free
Hopefully it will be soon propagated on mirrors too
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
For a fresh install you need a netinst or monolithic CD as the
kernel-image udebs have not moved to sarge yet. The netboot would fail
to find the modules.
I'll try to test this on a few systems sometime soon.
As for the installation, can DFS be used to install amd64
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for the installation, can DFS be used to install amd64-sarge?
I tried this last year using the same images from October.
The DFS takes more expertise to use than the Debian Installer.
The DFS boots into ram like a LiveCD unless you tell the kernel
to boot an existing
Goswin wrote:
So anyone willing to test testing, esspecialy a fresh install, can
point apt to:
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 testing main contrib non-free
OK. I remember some things from my first install so now I can check.
I used the above sources.list with this image
test
--
Damon L. Chesser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
62 matches
Mail list logo
