On Thursday 22 March 2012, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 01:05:16AM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Beware: The ITK MPM is not included for the time being. This may
or may not change until the freeze.
Just to make sure; you are aware that there is a 2.4 patch for
I think i received this mail via apache list. I am able to filter most
of the mails via headers, but some of them like this one, i can't. Can
somebody help me relate this kind of mail to apache list?
greets!
aL
Received: from liszt.debian.org (liszt.debian.org [82.195.75.100])
by
Package: apache2-suexec-custom,apache2-suexec-pristine
Version: 2.4.1-2
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8:
Looks like there are some things to change for packages that ship a
configuration file for Apache: syntax changes and file location change.
Just to be sure, is there a better solution to handle the transition
than to wait for Apache 2.4 to come into unstable, breaking these
packages, and then fix
Looks like there are some things to change for packages that ship a
configuration file for Apache: syntax changes and file location change.
Just to be sure, is there a better solution to handle the transition
than to wait for Apache 2.4 to come into unstable, breaking these
packages, and then fix
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 08:23:54AM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Yes I am aware of it. I haven't had a chance to review it yet, though,
and I thought that having the rest of the package already in
experimental would be a good idea. What makes me a bit cautios about
ITK is that it adds new
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tags 665002 +pending
fixed 665002 2.4.1-3
thanks
On 22.03.2012 10:46, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
The leftover files are actually alternatives that were installed by
the package but have not been properly removed.
Thanks for spotting this. I've fixed
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 665002 +pending
Bug #665002 [apache2-suexec-custom,apache2-suexec-pristine]
apache2-suexec-{custom, pristine}: leaves alternatives after purge: suexec,
suexec.8.gz
Added tag(s) pending.
fixed 665002 2.4.1-3
Bug #665002
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Jonathan,
it's me again. We've written the promised mail to
debian-devel-announce including pointers to the wiki with hands-on
tutorials how to reverse packagers should interact with us. Is this
somewhat what you expected to read?
For your
Arno Töll wrote:
However, reading your snippet I realized, you use module directives
which aren't available until one enables the rewrite module in your
case. We might think how to allow packagers of web applications to
tell us, your configuration needs a special module. As we wrote in
the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22.03.2012 14:46, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Ideally the pathinfo stuff should be conditional on whether the
rewrite module is already loaded.
That's reasonably easy to achieve:
IfModule mod_rewrite.c
RewriteEngine on
RewriteRule [whatever]
Arno Töll wrote:
I am not sure whether the NEWS file is an appropriate place for
packaging hints but I will think about.
I think a brief mention would be useful for sysadmins with local
packages who do not necessarily follow debian-devel-announce.
Similarly, I will think whether we will give
Package: apache2.2-common
Version: 2.2.22-2
Severity: grave
Starting web server: apache2/usr/sbin/apache2: symbol lookup error:
/usr/sbin/apache2: undefined symbol: pcre_info
Action 'start' failed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-apache-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
It happened to me too after I upgraded libpcre3 to 8.30..-2
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-apache-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
14 matches
Mail list logo
