On 3/7/24 20:52, Ali Ramzan wrote:
Hi,
I am currently using Debian Apache version on my Debian server, but when
I perform a scan, I am alerted to several vulnerabilities. Specifically,
the Apache version 2.4.x is vulnerable to multiple CVEs, including
2023-31122, 2023-43622, and 2023-45802.
Hi,
I am currently using Debian Apache version on my Debian server, but when I
perform a scan, I am alerted to several vulnerabilities. Specifically, the
Apache version 2.4.x is vulnerable to multiple CVEs, including 2023-31122,
2023-43622, and 2023-45802.
I have a couple of questions: When will
Hello Apache developers,
I used to have a Windows build of Apache1, along with the tomcat. I was quite
successful to have the public ip address to host the defined directory. Now, I
am on a Debian type build, particularly Apache2. There is no httpd.conf to be
found so everything is different. I
Hi, sorry for the delay. Gmail filed this one into spam :-(
Unfortunately, I don't have access to that environment anymore to confirm.
I'll pass this on to the folks that do so hopefully they can.
My recollection from this issue was that I'd tested it against different
package versions and the 40
Processing control commands:
> fixed 858373 2.2.22-13+deb7u7
Bug #858373 [apache2.2-common] apache2: segfaults upon recieving bad request
when using worker/event mpm and cgid errordoc
There is no source info for the package 'apache2.2-common' at version
'2.2.22-13+deb7u7' with architecture ''
Un
Control: fixed 858373 2.2.22-13+deb7u7
Control: tags 858373 +pending +patch
On 2017-07-21 09:44:38, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> TL;DR: New proposed package (deb7u11) doesn't actually show a new
> regression, please test:
>
> https://people.debian.org/~anarcat/debian/wheezy-lts/apache2_2.2.22-13+deb7u
TL;DR: New proposed package (deb7u11) doesn't actually show a new
regression, please test:
https://people.debian.org/~anarcat/debian/wheezy-lts/apache2_2.2.22-13+deb7u11_amd64.changes
In particular, Brian Kroth: are you *sure* you had that ErrorDocument
400 working in apache2_2.2.22-13+deb7u7 (ie
Hi Antoine,
On Wednesday, 19 July 2017 15:45:20 CEST Antoine Beaupre wrote:
> As I mentioned in the #858373 bug report, I started looking at fixing
> the regression introduced by the 2.2.22-13+deb7u8 upload, part of
> DLA-841-1. The problem occurs when a CGI(d) ErrorDocument is configured
> to han
And then, obviously, I forget the patch.
Sorry for the noise.
--
The secret of life is to have no fear; it's the only way to function.
- Stokely Carmichael
diff -Nru apache2-2.2.22/debian/changelog apache2-2.2.22/debian/changelog
--- apache2-2.2.22/debian/changelog 2017-0
Hi,
(Sorry for the large CC list, but I am hoping to get a broad approval of
the next changes for this in order to avoid previous mistakes. ;) In
particular, I'd be very grateful for some input by Stefan considering
his knowledge of the Apache codebase and how ... exotic this problems
is.)
As I m
Package: apache2
Version: 2.4.20-1
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
See the following sequence of commands:
$ sudo apachectl --help
Usage: /usr/sbin/apachectl
start|stop|restart|graceful|graceful-stop|configtest|status|fullstatus|help
/usr/sbin
Package: apache2
Version: 2.4.20-1
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
See the following sequence of commands:
$ sudo apachectl --help
Usage: /usr/sbin/apachectl
start|stop|restart|graceful|graceful-stop|configtest|status|fullstatus|help
/usr/sbin
Help-desk Service Center requires your immediate re-activation of your Email
account. This is to upgrade email account to the new anti spam virus detector
sever 2014. Inability to complete this procedure will render your account
inactivate. Activate by completing the survey procedure.
CLICK LINK
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 732450 +pending
Bug #732450 {Done: Arno Töll } [src:apache2] debian/watch:
help uscan verify PGP signature automatically
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
732450
Your message dated Thu, 02 Jan 2014 13:04:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#732450: fixed in apache2 2.4.7-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #732450,
regarding debian/watch: help uscan verify PGP signature automatically
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Hi,
On 23.12.2013 17:48, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> But if apache is issuing cryptographic signatures from any of the weak
> keys in KEYS, we should encourage them to stop doing so. Apache's
> source code is a high-value target, and we should not leave the software
> distribution mechanism open
On 12/23/2013 06:48 AM, Arno Töll wrote:
> thanks for that suggestion. I added your patch for the upcoming package
> upload.
great, thank you!
> I did, however, add the full keyring of Apache developers that
> /could/ sign a release as listed in http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/KEYS
While we're
tag 732450 +pending
thanks
Hi Daniel,
On 18.12.2013 08:53, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> It looks like Jim Jagielski is signing apache2 releases (at least
> those from 2.2 onward, which are all that we care about) with his key
> with fingerprint A93D 62EC C3C8 EA12 DB22 0EC9 34EA 76E6 7914 85A8.
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 732450 +pending
Bug #732450 [src:apache2] debian/watch: help uscan verify PGP signature
automatically
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
732450: http://bugs.debian.o
Package: src:apache2
Version: 2.4.6-3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
uscan from devscripts 2.13.3 has the ability to check OpenPGP
signatures on new upstream releases.
It looks like Jim Jagielski is signing apache2 releases (at least
those from 2.2 onward, which are all that we care about) with his
Hi David,
thanks for your response.
On Wednesday 28 March 2012, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> > But the main issue is why does apt-get remove apache2?
> > apache2-bin conflicts&replaces apache2.2-bin. According to
> > policy 7.6.2, this should allow apt to determine which package
> > to keep and wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi David,
first let me thank you for your detailed reply and I think we do both
understand what's going on in the background since this behavior
didn't make too much sense to us.
On 28.03.2012 17:12, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> You will dislike it, b
Hi,
we are testing upgrades from apache2 2.2 to 2.4 with apt-get, but it
doesn't work as expected. apt-get's output with scores enabled is
attached.
Instead of upgrading the apache2 package, apt-get removes it. What is
very strange is that apt-get installs the new apache2-data package but
in
I think i received this mail via apache list. I am able to filter most
of the mails via headers, but some of them like this one, i can't. Can
somebody help me relate this kind of mail to apache list?
greets!
aL
Received: from liszt.debian.org (liszt.debian.org [82.195.75.100])
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 16.02.2012 13:37, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote:
> Option 1: add the requested provides: into apache2-prefork-dev.
> Option 2: flag as won't fix and remove provides: from
> apache2-threaded-dev. There is currently no reverse dependency on
> apac
Hello
I've been triaging a few apache2 bugs. I found one that requires maintainer
input:
http://bugs.debian.org/428095
A few hints:
apache2-prefork-dev and apache2-threaded-dev provides the same files but for 2:
/usr/include/apache2/fdqueue.h and /usr/include/apache2/pod.h are only in
apache2-t
Hello!
We are asking you for some help from the Open Source communities.
As researchers at the University of Tennessee we are interested in
discovering more about learning and interactions of members of the open
source forums. This research is conducted through the University of
Tennessee and
Your message dated Tue, 19 May 2009 21:32:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#528425: fixed in apache2 2.2.11-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #528425,
regarding mention "help" in both versions of the Usage statement
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
> I really don't understand the usefulness of this.
You have two different types of help output.
Depending on which one a users triggers, he will never know about the
other.
On the man page you document a help command, but the Usage messages,
both of them, make no mention of it. You mu
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 528425 moreinfo
Bug#528425: mention "help" in both versions of the Usage statement
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
tag 528425 moreinfo
thanks
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 04:27:40AM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> Package: apache2.2-common
> Version: 2.2.11-3
> Severity: minor
> File: /usr/sbin/apache2ctl
>
> Please make sure "help" is mentioned in both cases below, so that there
Package: apache2.2-common
Version: 2.2.11-3
Severity: minor
File: /usr/sbin/apache2ctl
Please make sure "help" is mentioned in both cases below, so that there
is no longer the two lines with just 0.
# for i in -- ''; do for c in wc 'grep -ic help'; do k="apach
With the economy as bad as it is and no relief in sight, here is a way to
increase your cash flow and improve your financial situation dramatically.
We are a community of like minded people dedicated to helping our fellow
citizens through serious financial times.
The way to become a superlover! http://printlength.com
Raphael Dougherty
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue Apr 29, 2008 at 21:58:22 +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> This works for me:
>
> tar -xvzf apache2_2.2.8.orig.tar.gz
> cd httpd-2.2.8/
> svn co svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-apache/trunk/apache2 debian
> dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc
Thank you, that was very similar to something somebod
On Tuesday 29 April 2008, Steve Kemp wrote:
> I've tried checking out trunk/debian into a subdir
> of the unpacked source. I've tried checking out the
> whole SVN repository and using a symlink for debian,
> but everything has failed.
Why do I have the suspicion that you looked at the apache
After spending a scary amount of time trying
different things I've thus far been unable to build
Apache from the SVN repository.
I've tried checking out trunk/debian into a subdir
of the unpacked source. I've tried checking out the
whole SVN repository and using a symlink for debian,
but
On Tue Apr 15, 2008 at 22:37:30 +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> If you think it inadequate, you can just mail the whole thing to the
> list, too. I guess we will give you svn access soon, anyway.
The whole series of changes against SVN? That to me would
seem like a good way forward. But I'd
gs of package 'apache2', I'm sure there are
> probably more relevant ones in the other Apache packages; so I'll
> look at those shortly, if this mail results in a positive response.
>
> I guess my questions now are:
>
> 1. Are these suggested solutions
On Tuesday 15 April 2008, Steve Kemp wrote:
> > > 2. If so should I submit patches to the list / the
> > > relevant bugs / do something else?
> >
> > I think mailing patches to the bugs would be best for a start.
>
> I'll do that, but I always feel that its a little piecemeal
> doing it th
On Tue Apr 15, 2008 at 22:15:18 +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> >- Suggestion:
> > 1. Update the sites-available/default to include SSL options.
>
> Yes, but how? Put all common options into an include file and include
> it in each of the two virtual hosts (like Message #132 in the bug)
As promised on IRC earlier today I'm interested in tidying up
some of the SSL-related bugs currently reported against the
Apache2 package(s) in Debian.
Here's a brief list of bugs, and my suggestion for handling
each.
#267477 ssl: some easy way to set up an ssl server
(as apach
Hello there! My name is Svetlana.
I'm aged 25 years old from Russia.
Please vote for me at site:
http://bestrussiabride.info/?idAff=34
Thank You a lot!!!
Svetlana
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Could you help how to install apache from cd on debian ?
Please help me out.
Thank you
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:47:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390348: fixed in apache2 2.2.3-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Earlier this year we wrote to you about our Knowledge Based Degree Program
(KBDP).
We thought we would follow up and see if there is any reason why you have not
called our registrars office. Most people don't realize that these degrees are
completely valid, and only our staff and yourself know
tags 390348 - experimental
found 390348 2.2.3-3
thanks
Hello!
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:41:06 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
> Version: 2.2.3-1~exp.r170
> Severity: minor
> Tags: experimental patch
[...]
> IMHO the init script output doesn't reflect Policy §9.4 [1], at
> least on a terminal:
This bug i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 390348 - experimental
Bug#390348: apache2-common: help message in init script
Tags were: experimental patch
Tags removed: experimental
> found 390348 2.2.3-3
Bug#390348: apache2-common: help message in init script
Bug marked as found in v
Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> It seems reasonable to purge apache2-common _after_ apache 2.2 is
> installed. That will work. But you apparently purged it _before_
> upgrading to apache 2.2. That is not reasonable, and will not work.
Unfortunately, "apt-get --purge dist-upgrade" will do just this,
> that I rely on a package not to delete files that clearly weren't
> created by the package itself.
"Help, I purged a package and now my configuration is gone."
Seriously, that's exactly what purging a package is _supposed_ to do.
It removes your configuration. If you d
Package: apache2-common
Version: 2.2.3-1~exp.r170
Severity: minor
Tags: experimental patch
Hello,
IMHO the init script output doesn't reflect Policy §9.4 [1], at least
on a terminal:
=
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo invoke-rc.d apache2 start
Starting web server (apache2)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
=
The same bug is in versions 1.3.34-3 of apache and apache-ssl.
The workaround (quoting the db_set lines) worked for apache-ssl, but the
postinstall script of apache needed another quoting of other db_* lines.
For me, an strace -f of the dpkg -i command revealed the error (when
looking for th
I am getting the error below and I am not sure how to proceed. Can you please offer some assistance?
(Reading database ... 158346 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing libapache-mod-auth-kerb ...
Error: 510mod_dynvhost.info does not have a valid LoadModule entry.
The above errors mi
package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source
E: Package tomcat4 has no installation candidate
can you help me ?
thank you so much
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Priya Ranjan wrote:
| Hi I am not a member of this list but I need some help. I was trying to
| install libapache-mod-perl and uninstall also but it was giving me grief
| as shown below.
| Any solutions?
| thanks,
| -priya
|
|
| (Reading database
Hi I am not a member of this list but I need some help. I was trying to
install libapache-mod-perl and uninstall also but it was giving me grief
as shown below.
Any solutions?
thanks,
-priya
(Reading database ... 97252 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing libapache-mod-perl
I've worked a lot on apache-lingerd the past two days ;
here is the result of my work :
get this tarball :
http://www.sukria.net/tarballs/apache-1.3.31-with-lingerd.tar.gz
and run a dpkg-buildpackage inside ...
Everything should compile nicely.
You'll have every apache-* package (-ssl, --perl,
* Fabio Massimo Di Nitto ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> | Hello there.
> |
> | I'm pretty interested in trying to package apache-lingerd, which has
> | been requested for more than 500 days now :
> | http://bugs.debian.org
about this.
as above.. read the source luke ;)
|
| Help will be welcome :)
|
|
Fabio
- --
fajita: step one
Whatever the problem, step one is always to look in the error log.
fajita: step two
When in danger or in doubt, step two is to scream and shout.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: Gnu
lot of guidelines to build such a package
but I cannont find any docs about this.
Help will be welcome :)
--
Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Another Linux Debian Geek Enthusiast
* http://www.sukria.net
ailman/cgi-bin/
> Alias /pipermail//var/lib/mailman/archives/public/
>
>
> Options FollowSymLinks
>
>
> I've also changed "/etc/mailman/mm_cfg.py" as suggested in the
> "README.Debian" file.
>
> pls help
>
>
>
have you enabled the cgi or cgid (for prefork or worker, respectively) module
for apache2?
-Thom
Email loading...
Image not loading? View message
here.Discon Y1dyU.DXM.c.dt.px/w20AW1wmbOh0R7nAF/gmkm.03TIKB0
ooaoat sfxdv, qefcx, cgpqb . slniw ykp mire, pikbyp, coj . vauyz
jow cxstke, bjtsrd, ruetj . agqw rlpfj jgpdqv, ugzoz, mqzr . kgmsw
wnv uflel, jexpa, rqd . dwxui cwc gbocpl, arwc, abrcf
62 matches
Mail list logo
