On 2015-06-25 11:40, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Followup-For: Bug #768815
For wheezy-jessie we ignored the remaining problems in piuparts, but
for wheezy-jessie-stretch I'd like to get rid of them:
1m41.5s ERROR: FAIL: debsums reports modifications inside the chroot:
On 2015-08-08 22:36, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Do you know if there is any practical difference between conflicts and
breaks+replaces in this case?
I don't think so. All dependencies on apache-2.2-common should be gone
by now, so removal of that package could happen anytime without
influencing any
On Saturday 08 August 2015 09:34:52, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
With apache2.2-common being gone this should be rather easy.
IIRC these conffiles were taken over by the apache2 package, so
all that should be needed are unversioned
Breaks+Replaces: apache2.2-common
in the apache2
Followup-For: Bug #768815
For wheezy-jessie we ignored the remaining problems in piuparts, but
for wheezy-jessie-stretch I'd like to get rid of them:
1m41.5s ERROR: FAIL: debsums reports modifications inside the chroot:
/etc/apache2/conf-available/other-vhosts-access-log.conf
On Wednesday 19 November 2014 16:49:44, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 2014-11-18 14:23, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
I think it would be best to ask the dpkg maintainers if they can
make dpkg recognize that the obsolete conffiles have been
removed. If that
that is a hard part
but I got some weird
On 2014-11-18 14:23, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
I think it would be best to ask the dpkg maintainers if they can make
dpkg recognize that the obsolete conffiles have been removed. If that
that is a hard part
but I got some weird idea about generalized file ownership:
(the classic ones)
* you own
On 19.11.2014 16:49, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
PS: do you need the apache2.2-common transitional package? would
upgrades work if that would not exist?
Please see https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/07/msg00450.html
for all the gory details. We added it very late in the process to work
On 2014-11-19 23:26, Arno Töll wrote:
On 19.11.2014 16:49, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
PS: do you need the apache2.2-common transitional package? would
Please see https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/07/msg00450.html
Nice writeup. No further questions :-)
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hi Andreas,
On Monday 10 November 2014 00:11:20, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 2014-11-09 19:01, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Sunday 09 November 2014 14:21:34, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
I'm not sure whether (or how) dpkg-maintscript-helper mv_conffile
can be used reliably to rename a conffile and
Hi,
On 10.11.2014 00:11, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
that process would have to be distributed to two packages ...
We do right that already, the best we can. cf.:
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-apache/apache2.git/tree/debian/apache2.preinst
Package: apache2.2-common
Version: 2.4.10-6
Severity: important
Hi,
this bug blocks doing piuparts wheezy - jessie upgrade tests for the
whole apache2 stack and any rdepends.
debsums: missing file /etc/bash_completion.d/apache2.2-common (from
apache2.2-common package)
debsums: missing file
On Sunday 09 November 2014 14:21:34, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
I'm not sure whether (or how) dpkg-maintscript-helper mv_conffile
can be used reliably to rename a conffile and switch ownership to
another package at the same time.
I don't see how there is any way to handle rename and takeofer of
On 2014-11-09 19:01, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Sunday 09 November 2014 14:21:34, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
I'm not sure whether (or how) dpkg-maintscript-helper mv_conffile
can be used reliably to rename a conffile and switch ownership to
another package at the same time.
I don't see how there
13 matches
Mail list logo
