Re: ImageMagick / NetPBM performance

2007-02-11 Thread Martin Guy
If so, he could try the EABI port, which gives a significant floating point performance boost. About a factor of 11 increase in FP speed in fact. Install Debian armel and help them complete it - see the links in the first line of wiki.debian.org/ArmEabiPort. You'll have the fastest slug on the

Re: ImageMagick / NetPBM performance

2007-02-11 Thread Lennert Buytenhek
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 04:09:19PM +0100, Oystein Viggen wrote: > > of user time whereas on my NSLU2 (ARM 266 Mhz) it uses 23.57 s of user > > time. That is to be expected, of course. Oh, I forgot, it also uses > > 8m29.430 s of system time. Adding up to a real time of 9m! Why is that? > > Isn't

Re: ImageMagick / NetPBM performance

2007-02-11 Thread Oystein Viggen
* [David Fokkema] > of user time whereas on my NSLU2 (ARM 266 Mhz) it uses 23.57 s of user > time. That is to be expected, of course. Oh, I forgot, it also uses > 8m29.430 s of system time. Adding up to a real time of 9m! Why is that? Isn't resizing pictures most likely a floating point heavy ac

ImageMagick / NetPBM performance

2007-02-11 Thread David Fokkema
Hi group, I recently installed debian on an NSLU2 and I'm encountering the following problem. ImageMagick (and NetPBM) are extremely slow when resizing photo's. Of course, I know I can't expect to much of it, but on my desktop (Intel Pentium 4 2.8 Ghz) convert finishes in about 0.696 s of user tim