Martin Guy wrote:
2008/1/16, Przemyslaw Kwiatkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I use lenny on my N2100 with standard kernel
(linux-image-2.6.22-3-iop32x) - works excellent! I have just rebuilt
kernel with make-kpkg (I used original 2.6.22-3-iop32x config and only
enabled ARM_THUMB, AEABI and
Ok, someone else did recommend ReiserFS
Is it a kernel patch needed to add reiserFS support, or just some other
libraries/packages to add?
Cheers
Sam
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin
Guy
Sent: 26 January 2008 05:43
To: Sam Reed
Is it a kernel patch needed to add reiserFS support, or just some other
libraries/packages to add?
The one included in the standard kernel is ok.
$ apt-cache search reiser
for tools to create/fsck/tune reiser volumes
M
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
SLUG:~# apt-cache search reiser
cpudyn - CPU dynamic frequency control for processors with scaling
gpart - Guess PC disk partition table, find lost partitions
libaal-dev - Reiser4's application abstraction library
libparted1.7-1 - The GNU Parted disk partitioning shared library
libparted1.7-dbg -
reiserfsprogs - User-level tools for ReiserFS filesystems
should do. Reiser4 is not much loved...
packages.debian.org - search reiserfsprogs - Files
to see what's in it. reiserfs3 is the one we know and love
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Ah, ok, didn't know that. Thanks for the pointers :)
http://packages.debian.org/etch/arm/reiserfsprogs/filelist
/sbin/debugreiserfs
/sbin/fsck.reiserfs
/sbin/mkfs.reiserfs
/sbin/mkreiserfs
/sbin/reiserfsck
/sbin/reiserfstune
/sbin/resize_reiserfs
Seemingly is the stuff that reiser4progs, but
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 09:37:40PM -, Sam Reed wrote:
Hi,
I've got a 500GB drive attached to my Debian NSLU2, and noticed there was
25GB of space missing
A bit of research found it was reserved space - 5% (of 500 = 25)
And was able to change this using tune2fs -m 1
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 05:42:31AM +, Martin Guy wrote:
Not used JFS, but used reiserfs on x86 and ARMs for years and never
lost a byte, no matter how roughly I treated them. ext3 is slow,
probably due to being ext2 fs with some extra stuff on top, and it has
happened that the underlying
It's good to start getting different peoples POV's
The reliability of ext3 would make sense, seeing as its the main/default
file system for linux
Haven't started putting files on it yet, and it's still on ext3..
Sam
-Original Message-
From: Lennart Sorensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
9 matches
Mail list logo
