Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Eric Sandeen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-16 17:13]:
>> So is this a regression? did it used to work? If so, when? :)
>
> The original report was with 2.6.18 but that was with the old ABI:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=423562
> I just installed a
Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 09:01:09AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>> * Eric Sandeen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-16 17:13]:
>>> So is this a regression? did it used to work? If so, when? :)
>> The original report was with 2.6.18 but that was with the old ABI:
>> http://b
On 10/17/08, Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This may just be too
> much for arm - running 50 simultaneous threads doing a million loops
> may take more than the 30 seconds allowed on some of the older boxes.
It failed on a 600MHz armel-sid box, but when I upped the timeout from
30 to
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 09:01:09AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Eric Sandeen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-16 17:13]:
> > So is this a regression? did it used to work? If so, when? :)
>
> The original report was with 2.6.18 but that was with the old ABI:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug
This one time, at band camp, Niko Tyni said:
> I'm a bit uneasy of testing this out on agnesi.d.o. Could somebody on
> the debian-arm list look into it a bit to see how often it fails and how?
>
> Just running the test (attached for convenience) with the system perl
> on lenny or sid should do, no
* Eric Sandeen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-16 17:13]:
> So is this a regression? did it used to work? If so, when? :)
The original report was with 2.6.18 but that was with the old ABI:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=423562
I just installed a 2.6.22 kernel with EABI and I can a
6 matches
Mail list logo
