Re: armel v4t vs v5

2012-04-19 Thread Timo Jyrinki
2012/4/18 Wookey woo...@wookware.org: I just asked and the answer seems to be 'some, but not much'. There are a few more useful instructions which should amount to a few percent speed improvement, but the gains are not exciting, which does suggest leaving it at v4t until really no-one cares

Re: armel v4t vs v5

2012-04-19 Thread Hector Oron
Hi, 2012/4/18 Wookey woo...@wookware.org: +++ Martin Guy [2012-04-18 14:30 +0200]: On 17 April 2012 18:36, Wookey woo...@wookware.org wrote: debian armel is currently built for v4t but is likely to move forward to v5 at some point. -1 as we have and others have products that are arm4vt

Re: Updating w.d.o/{intro/organization#distribution,ports/}

2012-04-19 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 04:27:12PM -0400, David Prévot wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 [ Huge cross-post, sorry. Please, only respond to your port list and debian-...@lists.debian.org, or at least keep me CC if you drop debian-www ] Hi ports and ports-like team, The

Re: armel v4t vs v5

2012-04-19 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
W dniu 19.04.2012 16:24, Hector Oron pisze: 2012/4/18 Wookey woo...@wookware.org: What chips are you using that are v4t? I know openmoko is and that's one group we've been considering so far. Samsung S3C2440 32-bit ARM920T which runs on popular device mini2440 and more devices is also