Re: Cubox-i 4x4 RAM [was Re: Performance of armhf boards]

On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 09:04:38AM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > That's how it's worked for me, yes. > > There's something about the imx6 that limits it to 3.8GB. It is Cortex-A9 which is 32bit, and hence it needs a bit of memory range set aside for I/O, like networking and disk and PCIe and

Re: Cubox-i 4x4 RAM [was Re: Performance of armhf boards]

On 2016-04-21, Rick Thomas wrote: > Are you saying that the amount of RAM seen by Debian Linux is > determined by something in u-boot? Yes. > But if I were using your patched mainline u-boot, I would get a > different (larger) number (almost, but not quite, the full 4.0GiB)? That's how it's

Cubox-i 4x4 RAM [was Re: Performance of armhf boards]

[Ooops, the last one got away from me before it was finished!] On Apr 20, 2016, at 10:26 PM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > This appears to be a thread forked from a reproducible-builds > discussion. :) Yeah… sorry for hijacking the thread… Please forgive my curiosity (: >

Cubox-i4x4 - [was Re: Performance of armhf boards]

On Apr 20, 2016, at 10:26 PM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > This appears to be a thread forked from a reproducible-builds > discussion. :) > > On 2016-04-20, Rick Thomas wrote: >> On Sun, Apr 17, 2016, at 06:36 PM, Steven Chamberlain wrote: >>> I was wondering what is the