On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 09:03:04PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 11:10:27PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> [...]
> > This whole "so many packages are broken on armel" narrative
> > is actually mostly FUD, and you are suggesting mitigations
> > for a
On 11/11/2017 09:03 PM, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 11:10:27PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> [...]
>> This whole "so many packages are broken on armel" narrative
>> is actually mostly FUD, and you are suggesting mitigations
>> for a nonexisting problem.
>>
>> The
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 11:10:27PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
[...]
> This whole "so many packages are broken on armel" narrative
> is actually mostly FUD, and you are suggesting mitigations
> for a nonexisting problem.
>
> The only major package where armel is the only release
3 matches
Mail list logo