Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf

2024-03-26 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024, Wookey wrote: >I looked at this last week, but got stuck because openjdk-17's >build-deps included graphviz Build-Depends-Indep: graphviz, pandoc You don’t need that. Use dpkg-checkbuilddeps -B, or manual inspection of the .dsc (packages.d.o does show the difference between

Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf

2024-03-26 Thread Wookey
On 2024-03-26 10:35 +, Simon McVittie wrote: > It seems that some of the dependency chains for packages that are still > waiting to be rebuilt on armel,armhf now end at openjdk-17, which is the > default Java version for most architectures and Build-Depends on itself > (with an alternative depe

Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf

2024-03-26 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024, Jeffrey Walton wrote: >Nothing beats a native compile in your basement. Yes, definitely. >> Do they run stock Debian armhf? > >So the CubieTruck is embarrassingly down level: Oofff… >The Wandboard is doing better: Right, close enough anyway. >I don't mind shipping to Eur

Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf

2024-03-26 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 7:44 PM Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > I’m answering back from the $dayjob address because Googlemail > cannot communicate with normal mailservers. > > >I can send you two dev boards, if you want them. The first is > >Wandboard Dual (Cortex-A9, ARMv7 with NEON), and the second

Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf

2024-03-26 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Hi Jeffrey, I’m answering back from the $dayjob address because Googlemail cannot communicate with normal mailservers. >I can send you two dev boards, if you want them. The first is >Wandboard Dual (Cortex-A9, ARMv7 with NEON), and the second is >CubieTruck 5 (Cortex-A7, ARMv7 with NEON and VFPv4

Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf

2024-03-26 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 6:30 PM Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > [...] > > The options for the armel/armhf porters are to either get the > .debs from me, install them in a chroot, and then the other B-D, > and rebuild the packages, or to use dpkg --force-depends to > install the dependencies (which make

Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf

2024-03-26 Thread Thorsten Glaser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA384 Hi, >In the -ports world, hppa doesn't have Java anyway, while m68k, powerpc >and sh4 seem to have had a re-bootstrap at some point; so I think it's >only the release architectures armel and armhf that have a problem here. I hacked that, and I trie

Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf

2024-03-26 Thread Simon McVittie
It seems that some of the dependency chains for packages that are still waiting to be rebuilt on armel,armhf now end at openjdk-17, which is the default Java version for most architectures and Build-Depends on itself (with an alternative dependency on openjdk-16, but that no longer exists). evoluti