Hi Sebastian,
thank you for your work on t64 transition.
Am Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 09:22:02PM +0200 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
I've spotted these Debian Med packages.
> gentle
> jellyfish
> quorum
> sbmltoolbox
No idea how we can help here. Please let us know if we can do
something.
> anfo
Hi Arm team,
according to
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/arm64/r/r-cran-partykit/8967298/log.gz
the autopkgtest on arm64 is failing. I tried to run the test on
my pinebook. But here it is passing.
Any clue what might be wrong here?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
Control: tags -1 help
Hi,
I need to admit that I have no idea why this error occures on arm64.
Any hint would be welcome
Andreas.
On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 01:21:43PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: libhmsbeagle
> Version: 3.1.2+dfsg-8
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on
Hi Steve,
On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 04:18:53PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
> xmmintrin.h is fundamentally tied to x86-only SIMD intrinsics. Either
> the package doesn't support non-x86, or there's a bug and it's
> mis-detecting which platform you're on.
I guess the problem is that debian/rules
Control: tags -1 help
Hi Debian Arm team,
I'm sorry, I have no idea how to fix this. :-(
Any help would be welcome
Andreas.
On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 01:21:18PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: libatomic-queue
> Version: 0.0+git20201007.df79403-2
> Severity: important
>
Control: tags -1 help
Hi Lucas,
On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 01:15:52PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64).
I admit I have currently no chance to test on arm64 but the package
builds
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 06:31:07PM +0200, Robert Wilkinson wrote:
> I agree with David. I do think it a bit rude.
May be you might like to check whom you call rude first. I'm running
some list statistics[1] where you can see that I'm not only subscribed
to several lists but even top poster
Hi,
I have one of the first PineBooks and realised I have not used it much.
The reason is that I that I realised I had too much time to invest to
get it running fully to become productive with it. It started that I
was not able to use plain Debian installer media and I also did not got
the
Control: tags -1 pending
Hi Lennart,
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 07:23:15PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > I don't have access to an arm64 system at the moment, but a good start
> > might be to fix the compiler warnings, such as the array subscript out
> > of bounds in global.c line 44. The
Control: tags -1 help
Hi Debian Arm team,
I admit I have no idea how to deal with this except by excluding
arm64 from the list of supported architectures which is definitely
not my prefered way of action.
Any help would be really appreciated.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at
Hi,
while the package libssw builds nicely on most architectures on armel,
mips64el and mipsel there is a linking issue[1]:
...
c -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/<>=.
-fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -DSIMDE_ENABLE_OPENMP
-fopenmp-simd -O3
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 10:15:33AM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > I admit I do not mind about the graphical installer - I always use the
> > test based installer.
>
> The "text based installer" may only work over serial console... slightly
> more information below.
How do I install a serial
Hi Andrei,
On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> See if maybe these pages in the wiki are helpful
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/InstallingDebianOn/PINE64/Pinebook
> https://wiki.debian.org/InstallingDebianOn/PINE64/PINEA64
Thank you for these links.
> See also this thread (still ongoing)
Hi David,
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 05:30:13PM +0100, David Pottage wrote:
> On 2020-04-21 16:41, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > The reason why I would prefere pure Debian is that it might be from
> > time to time that I would try to build a package for real Debian on
> > it. Bu
Hi David,
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 David Pottage wrote:
> Perhaps it is verboten to mention it her, but have you tried running
> Armbian on your pinebook?
No idea whether this is verboten - I'm personally open for anything that
works. I'm looking for the *easiest* and least error prone way to get
.
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 09:38:00AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 08:36:43AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 08:27:41AM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> > >
> > > I believe you may have quoted the w
Hi again,
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 08:36:43AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 08:27:41AM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> >
> > I believe you may have quoted the wrong part of the message. They're
> > still using a custom kernel so I'd push a bit harde
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 08:27:41AM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
>
> I believe you may have quoted the wrong part of the message. They're
> still using a custom kernel so I'd push a bit harder trying out a debian
> kernel to see if that fixes their issue.
As I wrote in my response to Vagrant I'd
Hi Vagrant,
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 12:49:34PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>
> The pinebook is pretty much my primary machine (using it right now to
> type this), and X is working fine here...
Cool!
> It's not fancy accelerated
> graphics, but it does work. I mostly have been using newer
Hi,
I have a pinebook of the first generation installed with Stretch. I
naively assumed that it would the right time to upgrade to Buster.
Unfortunately X does not start any more:
# grep EE /var/log/Xorg.[01].log
/var/log/Xorg.0.log:[12.349] Current Operating System: Linux pinebook
Control: tags -1 help
Sorry, I have no idea what to do. Any help is welcome.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 02:09:47PM +0200, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Source: libundead
> Severity: serious
> Version 1.0.9-2
>
> hello, recent ldc made the package FTBFS.
>
>
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 02:40:36PM +, James Bonfield wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 08:02:18AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > this is a kind ping since as I wrote below the issue seems not be solved.
>
> I'm not sure I can easily debug this as it only fails on s
Hi Steve,
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:44:53AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pandas/0.19.2-5.1ubuntu4/+build/13337694)
>
> This is not a problem with the Debian autobuilder. Something is attempting
> an unaligned access, which is not portable on armhf.
Hi,
I made some progress with excluding some tests on some architectures. The
last target I was trying to tackle was s390x which builds now. Not all
architectures have finished [1] currently but armhf has now failed with
...
Hi Lennart,
thanks for your suggestions. I hereby will forward it upstream hoping
for comments.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:10:04AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 09:57:09AM +0100, Edmund Grimley Evans wrote:
> > The infinite loop is still
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:45:43AM +0100, Edmund Grimley Evans wrote:
> There may be no demand for this package (rnahybrid) on armel, but the
> FTBFS might be caused by a bug in gcc-6, which would be worth
> reporting if someone can confirm it.
We have gcc-7 now. Would anybody volunteer to
Hi,
I'm not (yet) subscribed to this list since I just want to know first
whether this is the right list. I've recently bought a pinebook[1] and
my first surprise was that I can not simply use Debian installer images.
I was advised to use the pine installer and use Q4os image to install a
mini
Hi Edmund,
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 07:37:38PM +0100, Edmund Grimley Evans wrote:
> It seems to be possible to build this package on arm64.
> Is there any reason why it would not work on arm64?
It might be that tophat builds on other architectures but it Depends
bowtie2 | bowtie and these are
Hi Gianfranco,
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 07:23:20AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> > rnahybrid FTBFS on armel:
>
> the warning above is somewhat important
> (too many nested loops), and this usually relates badly with
> high optimization levels
>
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..
tags 861281 help
thanks
Hi,
I admit I have no idea what the problem might be and the build log (see
below) does not enable me to spot the issue. Any help would be welcome
since otherwise the only solution I could imagine is to ask ftpmaster to
remove the armel port of this package.
Kind
reopen 859667
thanks
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 06:03:46PM +0200, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> >
> >
> > I have the feelingt that this meand "no" to your second question.
> >
>
> isNaN is from the std.math module.
>
> http://dlang.org/phobos/std_math.html#.isNaN
>
> You would need to import it. ;-)
I
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 10:22:28PM +0200, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> Which compiler?
$ LANG=C apt-cache policy ldc
ldc:
Installed: 1:1.1.1-1
> Are NaNs being honoured?
Hmmm, no idea how to check this.
> What if you were to replace
> the `(x != x && f != f)` comparison with `(isNaN(x) && isNaN(f))`
Hi,
I admit I'm totally clueless and thus I'm asking D language team as well as
porters for help.
Thanks for any helpful hint
Andreas.
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 02:43:04PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Source: libundead
> Version: 1.0.6-1
> Severity: important
> Justification: fails to
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 07:19:00PM +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> >> when discussing bug #800469 upstream thinks that armhf should work and
> >> the question came up whether there is some chance to access an armhf
> >> machine that is comparable to our autobuilders.
> >>
> >
> > The porterbox
com> -
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 15:13:28 -0800
From: daviesrob <notificati...@github.com>
To: samtools/htslib <hts...@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Andreas Tille <ti...@debian.org>, Comment <comm...@noreply.github.com>
Subject: Re: [samtools/htslib] Support for mips/mipsel (#99)
Actua
Hi,
python-fastcluster seems to have an issue in the test suite for armel[1]:
...
Method: average...OK.
Meok
test_nan (tests.fastcluster_test) ... FAIL
test_vector (tests.fastcluster_test) ... thod: weighted...OK.
...
Metric: mahalanobis...Method: single...OK.
Metric: user...Mok
Hi Paul,
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 11:02:34AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > I guess I need some help in the build failure of r-bioc-shortread[1].
> ...
> > Error: segfault from C stack overflow
>
> You'll n
Hi arm porters,
I guess I need some help in the build failure of r-bioc-shortread[1].
Any idea why it fails with
...
** inst
** preparing package for lazy loading
Warning: multiple methods tables found for 'arbind'
Warning: multiple methods tables found for 'acbind'
Warning: replacing previous
38 matches
Mail list logo
