Bug#1057339: dash FTCBFS: host CFLAGS leak into build compiler invocation

2023-12-03 Thread Helmut Grohne
Source: dash Version: 0.5.12-6 User: debian-cr...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftcbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-arm@lists.debian.org Hi arm people and Andrej, this is one of those PAC/BTI "induced" cross build failures. Don't get me wrong. This problem has always been there. The PAC/BTI work just makes

another attempt at Y2038

2022-10-18 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi, I was also wondering about this Y2038 thingy and did some experiments. I'm reporting what I found to document it, but don't see much actionable stuff here. Many thanks to Arnd Bergmann for his input. Attempt #1: rebootstrap Given that I develop rebootstrap, attempting to use it for a time64

Re: ARC rebootstrap prereq (was Re: switching ARC to 64-bit time_t )

2020-03-26 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Alexey, On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 12:53:45PM +, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > Sorry for this stupid question but I'm not very familiar with use-cases for > libatomic-ops so would like to get some more clarification on what's needed > here. > > I know that GCC has quite a few built-ins for atomic

Re: ARC rebootstrap prereq (was Re: switching ARC to 64-bit time_t )

2020-03-26 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Alexey, On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 11:51:44AM +, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > I guess almost all of the packages you mentioned already have > needed improvements for ARC. I didn't mean to imply that anything was missing. I just mentioned those that usually need work without having checked any. >

Re: ARC rebootstrap prereq (was Re: switching ARC to 64-bit time_t )

2020-03-26 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Vineet, On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 05:25:58PM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote: > ARC glibc is still in works, but assuming that will happen in near future what > other upstream prerequisites are needed. The obvious ones would be Linux > kernel, > gcc, binutils: all 3 of which are supported for ARC.

Re: switching ARC to 64-bit time_t (Re: [RFC v6 07/23] RISC-V: Use 64-bit time_t and off_t for RV32 and RV64)

2020-02-20 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Arnd, On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 09:31:32AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > How do I build a latest RISCV 32-bit kernel + userland - do you have > > > a buildroot branch somewhere that I can build / test with qemu ? > > > > Maybe a bit off topic - there is such QEMU and Yocto/OE based test > >

Bug#947246: nss FTBFS on armel: error "NEON intrinsics not available with the soft-float ABI. Please use -mfloat-abi=softfp or -mfloat-abi=hard"

2019-12-23 Thread Helmut Grohne
Source: nss Version: 2:3.47-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: armel still is a release architecture User: helm...@debian.org Usertags: rebootstrap Since 2:3.47-1, nss fails to build from source on armel (it also fails to cross build to armel):

Bug#888478: systemd FTBFS on mipsel: /usr/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.29.90.20180122 assertion fail ../../bfd/elflink.c:9757

2018-01-25 Thread Helmut Grohne
Source: systemd Version: 236-3 Severity: serious User: helm...@debian.org Usertags: rebootstrap systemd fails to build from source on mipsel. Very likely this is not caused by this particular systemd upload, but by the binutils upload instead. In any case, the build log (attached) ends with: |

Bug#851273: libstdc++-6-dev: error when installing together with libstdc++-6-dev:armel

2017-01-13 Thread Helmut Grohne
Package: libstdc++-6-dev Version: 6.3.0-1 Severity: important User: helm...@debian.org Usertags: rebootstrap An attempt at installing libstdc++-6-dev:armel fails: | # apt-get -y install libstdc++-6-dev libstdc++-6-dev:armel | ... | dpkg: error processing archive

Bug#775050: FTCBFS for arm64: failure to determine stack direction

2015-01-10 Thread Helmut Grohne
Package: src:libsigsegv Version: 2.10-4 Tags: patch User: helm...@debian.org Usertags: rebootstrap libsigsegv FTCBFS for arm64. The configure script fails to determine the stack direction. The general way of determining stack direction in libsigsegv is to have a long list of cpu names to look up

Re: [m68k] preparing for GCC 4.9

2014-05-08 Thread Helmut Grohne
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 03:49:51PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Matthias Klose dixit: I would like to see some partial test rebuilds (like buildd or minimal chroot Haven???t tried yet, but Helmut Grohne does automated rebootstrapping of some ports using what he can get his hands