Re: Debian armhf test system?

2021-09-28 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 09:59:51AM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > We are trying to track down the cause of a build failure on Debian; > see [1]. I want to setup a Debian armhf system for testing. (I have > about 6 testing boards, but they are other OSes). > > I found the relevant area of the

Re: How to push back against repeated login attempts?

2021-03-03 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 09:50:33AM +, David Pottage wrote: > Thanks for the tip on FireHOL, and all their block lists. I was using just > the blocklist.de list and updating it nightly. It looks like I should be > able to get better coverage by using more block lists. > > You say that you

Re: How to push back against repeated login attempts?

2021-03-02 Thread Noah Meyerhans
>2. In addition to fail2ban you can download a blocklist, and use that as >well. I found this public blocklist with a script on how to >automatically block the IPs on the list. > >[2]https://gist.github.com/klepsydra/ecf975984b32b1c8291a +1 to using blocklists. I have been using

Re: Bug#956418: src:glibc: Please provide optimized builds for ARMv8.1

2020-05-07 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 04:15:09PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > >One solution for this would be to ship the optimized library in the same > > >package as the default library. Now this is not acceptable for embedded > > >systems as they might not need that library and can't remove it. This is >

Re: Bug#956418: src:glibc: Please provide optimized builds for ARMv8.1

2020-05-04 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Sun, May 03, 2020 at 11:53:35PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > The hardware capabilities system works fine upstream, but doesn't work > for us because: > 1) we want to be able to upgrade major upstream version online (as > opposed to fedora for example) > 2) we ship the optimized libraries in a

Re: Bug#956418: src:glibc: Please provide optimized builds for ARMv8.1

2020-04-22 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 05:48:27PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > I think the -moutline-atomics is probably good to enable by default > once we've got it (gcc 10). that's the suggestion I've heard from gcc > folks in Arm. JFTR, it's been backported to gcc 9 and is available in Debian's gcc-9 as

Re: Bug#956418: src:glibc: Please provide optimized builds for ARMv8.1

2020-04-21 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 12:18:35PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Significant performance impact has also been observed in less contrived > > cases (MariaDB and Postgres), but I don't have a repro to share. > > But indeed what counts is number on real workloads. It would be nice to > get