Re: Bug#861281: rnahybrid: FTBFS on armel

2017-09-27 Thread Marc Rehmsmeier
As interesting as this is, can you take me, Peter Steffen and Matthias Hoechsmann off this list? Thanks, and good luck Marc On 27/09/17 16:30, "Lennart Sorensen" wrote: On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 08:19:59PM +0100, Edmund Grimley Evans wrote: > It's a

Re: Bug#861281: rnahybrid: FTBFS on armel

2017-09-27 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 08:19:59PM +0100, Edmund Grimley Evans wrote: > It's a possibility to bear in mind, definitely, but the > perhaps-infinite loop can be observed with a cross-compiler: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=876825 I just tried doing the cross compile

Re: Bug#861281: rnahybrid: FTBFS on armel

2017-09-26 Thread Edmund Grimley Evans
> The failure in build may in fact just be because the build machine is > too slow. It's a possibility to bear in mind, definitely, but the perhaps-infinite loop can be observed with a cross-compiler: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=876825 (I will test with the compilers in

Re: Bug#861281: rnahybrid: FTBFS on armel

2017-09-26 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 12:21:20PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > Here is a patch that removes all the warnings I see. Maybe that will > help. I don't have an armel to test on. > > Most of the warnings are due to missing #include in a lot of places. The failure in build may in fact just be

Re: Bug#861281: rnahybrid: FTBFS on armel

2017-09-26 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 05:48:40PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Lennart, > > thanks for your suggestions. I hereby will forward it upstream hoping > for comments. Here is a patch that removes all the warnings I see. Maybe that will help. I don't have an armel to test on. Most of the

Re: Bug#861281: rnahybrid: FTBFS on armel

2017-09-26 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Lennart, thanks for your suggestions. I hereby will forward it upstream hoping for comments. Kind regards Andreas. On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:10:04AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 09:57:09AM +0100, Edmund Grimley Evans wrote: > > The infinite loop is still

Re: Bug#861281: rnahybrid: FTBFS on armel

2017-09-26 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 09:57:09AM +0100, Edmund Grimley Evans wrote: > The infinite loop is still there with gcc-7. I've created bug #876825. > > Before you exclude armel, you could perhaps try doing something about > this warning, which is given not just on armel and may or may not be > related

Re: Bug#861281: rnahybrid: FTBFS on armel

2017-09-26 Thread Edmund Grimley Evans
The infinite loop is still there with gcc-7. I've created bug #876825. Before you exclude armel, you could perhaps try doing something about this warning, which is given not just on armel and may or may not be related to the compiler going into an infinite loop: energy.c:539:104: warning:

Re: Bug#861281: rnahybrid: FTBFS on armel

2017-09-25 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:45:43AM +0100, Edmund Grimley Evans wrote: > There may be no demand for this package (rnahybrid) on armel, but the > FTBFS might be caused by a bug in gcc-6, which would be worth > reporting if someone can confirm it. We have gcc-7 now. Would anybody volunteer to

Re: Bug#861281: rnahybrid: FTBFS on armel

2017-04-28 Thread Edmund Grimley Evans
There may be no demand for this package (rnahybrid) on armel, but the FTBFS might be caused by a bug in gcc-6, which would be worth reporting if someone can confirm it.

Re: Bug#861281: rnahybrid: FTBFS on armel

2017-04-28 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 07:23:20AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hello, > > > rnahybrid FTBFS on armel: > > > the warning above is somewhat important > (too many nested loops), and this usually relates badly with > high optimization levels >... The warning is about an off-by-one in the

Re: Bug#861281: rnahybrid: FTBFS on armel

2017-04-27 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Gianfranco, On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 07:23:20AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > rnahybrid FTBFS on armel: > > the warning above is somewhat important > (too many nested loops), and this usually relates badly with > high optimization levels > > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..

Re: Bug#861281: rnahybrid: FTBFS on armel

2017-04-27 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hello, > rnahybrid FTBFS on armel: > the warning above is somewhat important (too many nested loops), and this usually relates badly with high optimization levels gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I/usr/include -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -O0

Re: Bug#861281: rnahybrid: FTBFS on armel

2017-04-26 Thread Andreas Tille
tags 861281 help thanks Hi, I admit I have no idea what the problem might be and the build log (see below) does not enable me to spot the issue. Any help would be welcome since otherwise the only solution I could imagine is to ask ftpmaster to remove the armel port of this package. Kind