On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 06:52:05AM -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> Wookey writes:
>
> > On 2020-11-17 21:19 +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> >> Thanks for your work on this. As of today polymake has been uploaded
> >> to use gcc-9 which doesn't have this problem, so the perl transition
> >> has
Wookey writes:
> On 2020-11-17 21:19 +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
>> Thanks for your work on this. As of today polymake has been uploaded
>> to use gcc-9 which doesn't have this problem, so the perl transition
>> has been unblocked.
>
> I don't understand how this works, because Alex was
On 2020-11-17 21:19 +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> Thanks for your work on this. As of today polymake has been uploaded
> to use gcc-9 which doesn't have this problem, so the perl transition
> has been unblocked.
I don't understand how this works, because Alex was able to reproduce the
all
On 2020-11-17 20:11 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> Dominic Hargreaves writes:
> > Thanks for your work on this. As of today polymake has been uploaded
> > to use gcc-9 which doesn't have this problem, so the perl transition
> > has been unblocked.
Good plan.
> I don't forsee having time (or
Dominic Hargreaves writes:
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 01:49:23AM +, Wookey wrote:
>> On 2020-11-14 16:33 +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
>> > On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 03:08:14PM +, Wookey wrote:
>>
>> > > I have just tried it, and the file built OK, getting to a resident
>> > > footprint
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 01:49:23AM +, Wookey wrote:
> On 2020-11-14 16:33 +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 03:08:14PM +, Wookey wrote:
>
> > > I have just tried it, and the file built OK, getting to a resident
> > > footprint of about 3.5G before completing.
>
On 2020-11-14 16:33 +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 03:08:14PM +, Wookey wrote:
> > I have just tried it, and the file built OK, getting to a resident
> > footprint of about 3.5G before completing.
OK, reading the bug a bit more carefully, I see that you were
On 11/14/20 4:08 PM, Wookey wrote:
> Yes. I have a 64Gb machine. (emag).
I wasn't aware that the Ampere stuff was generally available, and now I
see that through a generous donation, they power our buildds [1].
Do these run an unmodified Debian?
I'd like to run my own arm64 buildd, but
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 03:08:14PM +, Wookey wrote:
> On 2020-11-14 14:30 +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 10:12:19PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > > During the perl 5.32 transition we observed a build failure on arm64 which
> > > is reproducible on the
On 2020-11-14 14:30 +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 10:12:19PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > During the perl 5.32 transition we observed a build failure on arm64 which
> > is reproducible on the porterbox and at lease three different buidds::
> >
> >
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 10:12:19PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> During the perl 5.32 transition we observed a build failure on arm64 which
> is reproducible on the porterbox and at lease three different buidds::
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=974073
>
> However
11 matches
Mail list logo
