Re: Newer kernel for N4100?

2008-09-09 Thread Riku Voipio
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 06:20:47AM -0500, Bill Gatliff wrote: > Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > * Bill Gatliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-08 14:30]: > >> So now the kernel is very happy talking to the drives, apparently. But it > >> doesn't like the e1000's: > > I thought you were aware of this, bu

Re: Newer kernel for N4100?

2008-09-09 Thread Bill Gatliff
Peter Korsgaard wrote: >> "Bill" == Bill Gatliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Hi, > > Bill> ... and this patch is so bad, I hesitate to post it. But > Bill> if I don't, I'll lose it myself! :) > > ;) > > Bill> +#else > Bill> +#warning "TODO: Figure out how to deal with EEPROM c

Re: Newer kernel for N4100?

2008-09-09 Thread Bill Gatliff
Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Bill Gatliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-08 14:30]: >> So now the kernel is very happy talking to the drives, apparently. But it >> doesn't like the e1000's: > > I thought you were aware of this, but in case you're not: Thecus > removed the EEPROM from both i82541 chi

Re: Newer kernel for N4100?

2008-09-09 Thread Peter Korsgaard
> "Bill" == Bill Gatliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi, Bill> ... and this patch is so bad, I hesitate to post it. But Bill> if I don't, I'll lose it myself! :) ;) Bill> +#else Bill> +#warning "TODO: Figure out how to deal with EEPROM checksum on N4100" Bill> + static int

Re: Newer kernel for N4100?

2008-09-09 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Bill Gatliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-08 14:30]: > So now the kernel is very happy talking to the drives, apparently. But it > doesn't like the e1000's: I thought you were aware of this, but in case you're not: Thecus removed the EEPROM from both i82541 chips and stored the MAC address in t

Re: Newer kernel for N4100?

2008-09-08 Thread Bill Gatliff
Bill Gatliff wrote: > I found in the .17 kernel where Thecus commented out the EEPROM checksum test > in > the e1000 driver, I'm going to do the same and see what happens. My first > attempt caused the code to load all ff's for the MAC, which obviously isn't > what > I want. ... and this patch

Re: Newer kernel for N4100?

2008-09-08 Thread Bill Gatliff
Riku Voipio wrote: > On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:35:21PM -0500, Bill Gatliff wrote: >> I just built mainline 2.6.26 with iop32x_defconfig and arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc >> (GCC) 4.2.4 (Debian 4.2.4-2). Booting on my n4100, I get this: > >> RedBoot> exec -c "console=ttyS0,115200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] panic=

Re: Newer kernel for N4100?

2008-07-16 Thread Rtp
Bill Gatliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi, > Riku Voipio wrote: > >> >> perhaps you'll want to ask the sata_vsc author. another possibility is >> that the pci IRQ map is wrong and the driver isn't recieving interrupts >> from the sata controller. > > Here is lspci -vvv output. See anything?

Re: Newer kernel for N4100?

2008-07-14 Thread Bill Gatliff
Riku Voipio wrote: > > perhaps you'll want to ask the sata_vsc author. another possibility is > that the pci IRQ map is wrong and the driver isn't recieving interrupts > from the sata controller. Here is lspci -vvv output. See anything? Looks like the PCI-X SATA HBA is tied to IRQ 29. Not sur

Re: Newer kernel for N4100?

2008-07-14 Thread Riku Voipio
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:35:21PM -0500, Bill Gatliff wrote: > I just built mainline 2.6.26 with iop32x_defconfig and arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc > (GCC) 4.2.4 (Debian 4.2.4-2). Booting on my n4100, I get this: > RedBoot> exec -c "console=ttyS0,115200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] panic=5 root=nfs > nfsroot=192.1

Re: Newer kernel for N4100?

2008-07-14 Thread Rtp
Bill Gatliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi, > Riku Voipio wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 10:49:09AM -0500, Bill Gatliff wrote: >>> Anyone know of a recent kernel for the n4100? I was using the 2.6.17.8 >>> sources >>> from wpkg.org, which are a bit out of date. Is anyone else paying any >

Re: Newer kernel for N4100?

2008-07-14 Thread Bill Gatliff
Riku Voipio wrote: > On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 10:49:09AM -0500, Bill Gatliff wrote: >> Anyone know of a recent kernel for the n4100? I was using the 2.6.17.8 >> sources >> from wpkg.org, which are a bit out of date. Is anyone else paying any >> attention >> to this platform? > > What patches do

Re: Newer kernel for N4100?

2008-07-14 Thread Riku Voipio
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 10:49:09AM -0500, Bill Gatliff wrote: > Anyone know of a recent kernel for the n4100? I was using the 2.6.17.8 > sources > from wpkg.org, which are a bit out of date. Is anyone else paying any > attention > to this platform? What patches does the "wpkg.org 2.6.17.8" add

Newer kernel for N4100?

2008-07-12 Thread Bill Gatliff
Guys: Simultaneous with latest dist-upgrade, my N4100's RAID5 array went south (by now, you'd think I would have learned to not mess with what wasn't broke). I don't know if there's a connection, but two simultaneous drive "failures" without warning have me feeling somewhat suspicious about a fa