On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 03:28:36PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> One part of the question here is "why do we need libatomic-ops?". The
> answer to that is, because libgc uses it and libgc is used by e.g. gcc,
> gnutls, guile, and make. Possibly, some of these could be built without
> libgc, but
Hi Alexey,
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 12:53:45PM +, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> Sorry for this stupid question but I'm not very familiar with use-cases for
> libatomic-ops so would like to get some more clarification on what's needed
> here.
>
> I know that GCC has quite a few built-ins for atomic
Hi Helmut,
> > 2. libgpg-error has ARC support since v1.33, see:
> >
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__git.gnupg.org_cgi-2Dbin_gitweb.cgi-3Fp-
> 3Dlibgpg-2Derror.git-3Ba-3Dcommit-3Bh-
>
Hi Alexey,
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 11:51:44AM +, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> I guess almost all of the packages you mentioned already have
> needed improvements for ARC.
I didn't mean to imply that anything was missing. I just mentioned those
that usually need work without having checked any.
>
Hi Helmut,
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 05:25:58PM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> > ARC glibc is still in works, but assuming that will happen in near future
> > what
> > other upstream prerequisites are needed. The obvious ones would be Linux
> > kernel,
> > gcc, binutils: all 3 of which are
Hi Vineet,
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 05:25:58PM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> ARC glibc is still in works, but assuming that will happen in near future what
> other upstream prerequisites are needed. The obvious ones would be Linux
> kernel,
> gcc, binutils: all 3 of which are supported for ARC.
6 matches
Mail list logo
