On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 01:03:17PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 12/1/20 5:02 AM, YunQiang Su wrote:
> > I am sorry for the later response.
> >Hi,
> >
> > I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend
> > to continue this for the lifetime of the Bullseye release
Hi,
sorry for the late reply and thanks a lot Graham for pinging me
directly. I didn't monitor -devel closely lately, but
I am an active porter for the following architecture and I intend
to continue this for the lifetime of the Bullseye release (est. end
of 2024):
For ppc64el, I
- test most
On 2020-11-02 22:23 +0200, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Hi
>
> We are doing a roll call for porters of all release architectures. If
> you are an active porter behind one of the release architectures [1]
> for the entire lifetime of Debian Bullseye (est. end of 2024), please
> respond with a signed
On 08.12.20 22:02, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 08:41:07PM +0100, basti wrote:
My arm hardware a only some raspi4 and 2 QNAP TS-219 behind a vDSL line.
Not the best, but can be used if needed.
One Pi can connect to dataceter.
If it can be cross-compiled, perhaps I can share
On 08/12/2020 21:02, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> My understanding is that Debian never cross compiles
Indeed Debian always builds native, though "native"
does include running 32-bit userlands on 64-bit kernels.
> And some packages would take way to long to compile on small machines
> like a pi4
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 10:09 PM Lennart Sorensen
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 09:53:11PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > I wonder if this is something we should address in the kernel, and make
> > the behavior in compat mode resemble native 32-bit kernels more closely.
> >
> > I think in
On 12/8/20 10:09 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> But does aarch32 mode imply full support for armv4 instructions?
> armhf at armv7 should be fine I would think, but is armel still v4 or did
> it move to v5?
Yes, armel is ARMv5T now.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 09:53:11PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> I wonder if this is something we should address in the kernel, and make
> the behavior in compat mode resemble native 32-bit kernels more closely.
>
> I think in general we should give as much incentive as possible for
> using
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 9:40 PM peter green wrote:
> On 08/12/2020 16:40, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 09:21:42AM +0100, basti wrote:
> >> Hello Adrian,
> >>
> >> How can I help to get bullseye on armel?
> >
> > My impression was that the biggest problem for armel and armhf
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 08:41:07PM +0100, basti wrote:
> My arm hardware a only some raspi4 and 2 QNAP TS-219 behind a vDSL line.
> Not the best, but can be used if needed.
> One Pi can connect to dataceter.
>
> If it can be cross-compiled, perhaps I can share a dedicated quad-core
> xeon, 64 GB
On 08/12/2020 16:40, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 09:21:42AM +0100, basti wrote:
Hello Adrian,
How can I help to get bullseye on armel?
My impression was that the biggest problem for armel and armhf is the
lack of reliable build machines. Not sure if any of the 64 bit arm
Am 08.12.20 um 17:40 schrieb Lennart Sorensen:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 09:21:42AM +0100, basti wrote:
>> Hello Adrian,
>>
>> How can I help to get bullseye on armel?
> My impression was that the biggest problem for armel and armhf is the
> lack of reliable build machines. Not sure if any of the
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 09:21:42AM +0100, basti wrote:
> Hello Adrian,
>
> How can I help to get bullseye on armel?
My impression was that the biggest problem for armel and armhf is the
lack of reliable build machines. Not sure if any of the 64 bit arm
servers are suitable for building armel or
I'm not an active porter, but I'm working on enabling and building out a
riscv64 farm. If I can join in with a bit of porting or simply by enabling
access, please let me know.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 3:21 AM basti wrote:
> Hello Adrian,
>
> How can I help to get bullseye on armel?
>
> Best
Hello Adrian,
How can I help to get bullseye on armel?
Best Regards
On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 01:03:17PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 12/1/20 5:02 AM, YunQiang Su wrote:
> > I am sorry for the later response.
> >Hi,
> >
> > I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend
> > to continue this for the lifetime of the Bullseye release
On 12/1/20 5:02 AM, YunQiang Su wrote:
> I am sorry for the later response.
>Hi,
>
> I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend
> to continue this for the lifetime of the Bullseye release (est. end
> of 2024):
>
> For mipsel and mips64el, I
> - test most
On 2020-11-20, Graham Inggs wrote:
> A friendly reminder about the porter roll call for bullseye.
>
> On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 at 22:23, Graham Inggs wrote:
>> We are doing a roll call for porters of all release architectures. If
>> you are an active porter behind one of the release architectures [1]
Hi
A friendly reminder about the porter roll call for bullseye.
On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 at 22:23, Graham Inggs wrote:
> We are doing a roll call for porters of all release architectures. If
> you are an active porter behind one of the release architectures [1]
> for the entire lifetime of Debian
19 matches
Mail list logo
