Re: QNAP TS-209: kernel 2.6.35-1~experimental.3 does not fit in flash

2010-10-20 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Marcus Better mar...@better.se [2010-09-21 06:50]: The RootFS1 doesn't fit in flash. User postinst hook script [flash-kernel] exited with value 1 MODULES=dep I've now tested with 2.6.36-rc5 from experimental. This version doesn't boot on the TS-209 at all. I've reported this upstream.

Re: QNAP TS-209: kernel 2.6.35-1~experimental.3 does not fit in flash

2010-10-20 Thread Marcus Better
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Martin Michlmayr wrote: I then built a 2.6.36-rc8 package with a workaround for the issue above and it installs fine and fits in flash (with LVM on RAID). So the issue you reported will be fixed when a newer 2.6.36 is uploaded. Great, I will wait

Re: QNAP TS-209: kernel 2.6.35-1~experimental.3 does not fit in flash

2010-09-21 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Marcus Better mar...@better.se [2010-09-21 06:50]: MODULES=dep Ok, that's bad news then. I'm currently on holidays but I'll look into it in a few weeks. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Re: QNAP TS-209: kernel 2.6.35-1~experimental.3 does not fit in flash

2010-09-20 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Marcus Better mar...@better.se [2010-09-19 09:45]: The RootFS1 doesn't fit in flash. User postinst hook script [flash-kernel] exited with value 1 Does /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/driver-policy exist? If so, what does it say? If not, edit /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf and set

Re: QNAP TS-209: kernel 2.6.35-1~experimental.3 does not fit in flash

2010-09-20 Thread Marcus Better
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Martin Michlmayr wrote: * Marcus Better mar...@better.se [2010-09-19 09:45]: The RootFS1 doesn't fit in flash. User postinst hook script [flash-kernel] exited with value 1 Does /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/driver-policy exist? Yes: # Driver