On 29/11/16 20:33, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Daniel Pocock [2016-11-29 15:48]:
>> Would you know if there has been any development in relation to the
>> Annapurna Labs chips?
>
> Antoine Tenart from Free Electrons submitted some Alpine related
> patches earlier this year,
On 29/11/16 20:33, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Daniel Pocock [2016-11-29 15:48]:
>> Would you know if there has been any development in relation to the
>> Annapurna Labs chips?
>
> Antoine Tenart from Free Electrons submitted some Alpine related
> patches earlier this year,
* Daniel Pocock [2016-11-29 15:48]:
> Would you know if there has been any development in relation to the
> Annapurna Labs chips?
Antoine Tenart from Free Electrons submitted some Alpine related
patches earlier this year, so there is some hope. OTOH, there doesn't
appear to
* Daniel Pocock [2016-04-12 10:03]:
> I came across the Qnap wiki[1], it doesn't mention the Qnap TS-431 and
> TS-431+
>
> Does anybody know about these, for better or worse?
The CPU used in the TS-431 is not supported in the mainline kernel (or
wasn't like time I checked).
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>
> I came across the Qnap wiki[1], it doesn't mention the Qnap TS-431 and
> TS-431+
>
> Does anybody know about these, for better or worse?
>
> The specs[2] say the TS-431+ chipset is an Annapurna Labs Alpine AL-212
>
5 matches
Mail list logo