Hello,
On 09/24/2017 12:55 AM, peter green wrote:
>> No, it's for run time. The target is sparse which can parse C and to be
>> able to handle system includes it needs the right cpp variables defined.
> Are people expected to have gcc installed when using this tool? if so
> gcc -dumpmachine may be
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 2:42 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 02:08:28AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 09:57:02PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>> >Hello,
>> >
>> >for the package sparse I have to distinguish armel and armhf. The reason
>> >is that sp
On 23/09/17 19:42, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 02:08:28AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 09:57:02PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Hello,
for the package sparse I have to distinguish armel and armhf. The reason
is that sparse parses system headers and
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 02:08:28AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 09:57:02PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >for the package sparse I have to distinguish armel and armhf. The reason
> >is that sparse parses system headers and so has to know which cpp
> >symbo
On 2017-09-22 21:57 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
>
> for the package sparse I have to distinguish armel and armhf. The reason
> is that sparse parses system headers and so has to know which cpp
> symbols to define. Usually it uses uname -m to distinguish platforms but
> that isn't suita
On 09/22/2017 03:57 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>
> for the package sparse I have to distinguish armel and armhf. The reason
> is that sparse parses system headers and so has to know which cpp
> symbols to define. Usually it uses uname -m to distinguish platforms but
> that isn't suitable to tell
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Uwe Kleine-König
wrote:
>...
> For armhf I need to define __ARM_PCS_VFP but that must be absent on armel.
Forgive my ignorance... If the compiler was built for the native
platform, then wouldn't the compiler and preprocessor definitions tell
you?
I guess I expec
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 09:57:02PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>Hello,
>
>for the package sparse I have to distinguish armel and armhf. The reason
>is that sparse parses system headers and so has to know which cpp
>symbols to define. Usually it uses uname -m to distinguish platforms but
>that is
There's some good stuff at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ARM/Thumb2PortingHowto but the real answer's
probably buried at http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp
You just have to be careful because armhf hardware can also run armel
(or the other way around) but only in one direction.
On 9/22/17, John P
On 09/22/2017 10:51 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Override the signal for SIGILL, then try to execute an instruction that is
> only available on either architecture, maybe?
That won't work. On an armv7 which runs armel (but which could run
armhf) the instruction will not fault but still
Override the signal for SIGILL, then try to execute an instruction that is only
available on either architecture, maybe?
Adrian
> On Sep 22, 2017, at 9:57 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> for the package sparse I have to distinguish armel and armhf. The reason
> is that sparse parse
Yeah, and cat /proc/cpuinfo doesn't really help much either. I don't
suppose it's kosher to look at some file names in
/var/cache/apt/archives. I had that problem with a phone I installed
Debian on a couple years ago. Finally gave up and left it armel when
I could have gone to armhf (I think).
Hello,
for the package sparse I have to distinguish armel and armhf. The reason
is that sparse parses system headers and so has to know which cpp
symbols to define. Usually it uses uname -m to distinguish platforms but
that isn't suitable to tell armel and armhf apart.
For armhf I need to define
13 matches
Mail list logo