On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 12:34:14PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007, Joey Hess wrote:
gst-plugins-base0.10
This seems to be a bug in type-handling as type-handling any linux-gnu
linux used to list armel (as I can see in previous versions of the
control file), but doesn't
In general, is is feasible to move the Architectures: field on so that
you can say
!sparc or any !sparc or something? I remember that a lot of the
port creation faff is going through all the packages that list every
architecture except one or two.
It would ease the job every time a new
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007, Loïc Minier wrote:
Bug filed.
Fixed in type-handling 0.2.23.
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2007/12/7, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is a list of packages that build-depend/conflict with something on
arm, but not on armel.
Nice analysis! Do we get the source that generated it, or was it a
one-time editor hack? :)
I've copied your list to wiki.debian.org/ArmEabiProblems inviting
Martin Guy wrote:
Nice analysis! Do we get the source that generated it, or was it a
one-time editor hack? :)
Yes, it was less *Sources and searching for .*-Depends.*arm and then
reading..
I've copied your list to wiki.debian.org/ArmEabiProblems inviting
people to investigate the packages
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 17:25:05 -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
This is a list of packages that build-depend/conflict with something on
arm, but not on armel. I've fltered out obvious cases where arm and
armel are meant to differ, but haven't investigated everything
thuroughly. Most of these are
This is a list of packages that build-depend/conflict with something on
arm, but not on armel. I've fltered out obvious cases where arm and
armel are meant to differ, but haven't investigated everything
thuroughly. Most of these are of the form
[long list of arches including arm] or [!arm] and
7 matches
Mail list logo
