Re: Summary of the Arm ports BoF at DC17

On Sep 14, Steve McIntyre wrote: > The Pine64 [6] is another alternative, based on a mobile CPU. It's > therefore got limited RAM and I/O. Upstreaming has taken a while, but > is getting there in current kernel releases. U-Boot head will work on > the board, including the UEFI

Re: Summary of the Arm ports BoF at DC17

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:58:02PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: >On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >> It's possible to replace the installed U-Boot >> on many boards, but that depends on hardware support being properly >> upstreamed; lack of that upstreaming work is another

Re: Summary of the Arm ports BoF at DC17

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:06:13PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: >On Sep 14, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >> The Pine64 [6] is another alternative, based on a mobile CPU. It's >> therefore got limited RAM and I/O. Upstreaming has taken a while, but >> is getting there in current kernel