Re: all translations for Jessie are 403.

On Thursday 09 November 2017 02:33:40 Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > > http://mirrordirector.raspbian.org/raspbian/ > > http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/ > > These aren't Debian mirrors, so you are going to have to ask the > Raspbian and LinuxCNC folks about

Re: Anyone using stretch/buster/sid on ARMv4t ?

On 2017-11-07, Adrian Bunk wrote: > This whole "so many packages are broken on armel" narrative > is actually mostly FUD, and you are suggesting mitigations > for a nonexisting problem. Have we gotten full c++11 support on armel yet ? (future, atomic, ...) /Sune

Re: Anyone using stretch/buster/sid on ARMv4t ?

std::future was fixed a while ago by upstream. It now works on any target even when there are no lock-free atomics in hardware. See: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64735 Btw, prior that, you would actually need at least ARMv7. Adrian > On Nov 9, 2017, at 6:40 PM, Sune Vuorela

Re: all translations for Jessie are 403.

On 09/11/17 06:22, Gene Heskett wrote: On Thursday 09 November 2017 00:54:52 Paul Wise wrote: On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 8:54 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: I did an update on an armhf/jessie install last night, and noticed that all the files for translations were missing, which resulted in quite a bit

Re: Anyone using stretch/buster/sid on ARMv4t ?

On Thursday 09 November 2017 12:40:59 Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2017-11-07, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > This whole "so many packages are broken on armel" narrative > > is actually mostly FUD, and you are suggesting mitigations > > for a nonexisting problem. > > Have we gotten full

Re: all translations for Jessie are 403.

On Thursday 09 November 2017 10:29:06 peter green wrote: > On 09/11/17 06:22, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Thursday 09 November 2017 00:54:52 Paul Wise wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 8:54 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > >>> I did an update on an armhf/jessie install last night, and noticed > >>> that