Re: Bug#1001314: mozjs78: FTBFS on armhf: '-mfloat-abi=hard': selected architecture lacks an FPU

2021-12-08 Thread Simon McVittie
On Wed, 08 Dec 2021 at 09:41:29 +, Simon McVittie wrote: > At a guess, perhaps the problem is that the mozjs build system is explicitly > specifying -march=armv7-a when it should be something like > -march=armv7-a+vfpv3 or accepting the compiler's default? Looks like this might be the same

Re: Bug#1001314: mozjs78: FTBFS on armhf: '-mfloat-abi=hard': selected architecture lacks an FPU

2021-12-08 Thread Simon McVittie
Control: retitle -1 mozjs78: FTBFS on armhf: '-mfloat-abi=hard': selected architecture lacks an FPU Control: tags -1 + help On Wed, 08 Dec 2021 at 10:14:55 +0100, Fabio Fantoni wrote: > Hi, as can be see in reproducible tests >

Re: Bug#1001314: mozjs78: FTBFS on armhf: '-mfloat-abi=hard': selected architecture lacks an FPU

2021-12-08 Thread peter green
On 08/12/2021 09:48, Simon McVittie wrote: On Wed, 08 Dec 2021 at 09:41:29 +, Simon McVittie wrote: At a guess, perhaps the problem is that the mozjs build system is explicitly specifying -march=armv7-a when it should be something like -march=armv7-a+vfpv3 or accepting the compiler's

Re: Bug#1001314: mozjs78: FTBFS on armhf: '-mfloat-abi=hard': selected architecture lacks an FPU

2021-12-08 Thread peter green
On 08/12/2021 23:56, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Wed, 08 Dec 2021 at 20:11:55 +, peter green wrote: >> The default -march value on Debian armhf is "armv7-a+fp". You should >> *NOT* use "armv7-a+vfpv3" as that specifies the version of vfpv3 >> with 32 double precision registers which is above

Re: Bug#1001314: mozjs78: FTBFS on armhf: '-mfloat-abi=hard': selected architecture lacks an FPU

2021-12-08 Thread Simon McVittie
On Wed, 08 Dec 2021 at 20:11:55 +, peter green wrote: > The default -march value on Debian armhf is "armv7-a+fp". You should > *NOT* use "armv7-a+vfpv3" as that specifies the version of vfpv3 > with 32 double precision registers which is above the Debian baseline.