+1 for maintaining iop32xx support. I bought and use one for debian
development and offer it as a service to open-source developers.
Keeping it running with standard stable and sid is essential to this.
I also remember nslu2 being the whizzo machine for hackers
On 25 June 2013 04:05, Chris
Martin Guy wrote:
+1 for maintaining iop32xx support. I bought and use one for debian
development and offer it as a service to open-source developers.
Keeping it running with standard stable and sid is essential to this.
I also remember nslu2 being the whizzo machine for hackers
Has anybody
On 06/19/2013 06:49 PM, Wookey wrote:
+++ Stephen Kelly [2013-06-19 15:48 +0200]:
Hi there,
In attempting to use clang as a cross compiler, clang needed to be
able to find some c runtime files etc which are part of gcc it
seems.
However, clang only looks in /usr/lib/gcc/$$TRIPLE for such
Dropping support for nslu2 is fine with me. As noted above, I can continue
running it with an older kernel and be equally happy. Or I could retire it
and get (another) rpi.
What would be (a little) worse for me though is dropping orion5 support. I
rely on security updates for my ts-209. OTOH, by
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Has anybody investigated using something like OpenFirmware as an
intermediate boot loader? If that were in internal Flash then it
should be possible to load the kernel from external storage-
Yeah; I didn't have time to try it out, but there's also
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 02:08:19PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Has anybody investigated using something like OpenFirmware as an
intermediate boot loader? If that were in internal Flash then it
should be possible to load the kernel from external
* Björn Wetterbom bj...@wetterbom.se [2013-06-26 13:28]:
What would be (a little) worse for me though is dropping orion5 support. I
rely on security updates for my ts-209. OTOH, by 2016 it may well be ready
to be replaced by something faster.
Ben didn't propose dropping Orion altogether -- it
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
We have a recurring problem with building kernels for armel: three
flavours (iop32x, ixp4xx, orion5x) require the kernel image size to be
less than 1.4-1.5 MB in order to fit into a fixed flash partition.
As more features continue to be added to
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 03:13:48PM +0200, Arnaud Patard wrote:
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
We have a recurring problem with building kernels for armel: three
flavours (iop32x, ixp4xx, orion5x) require the kernel image size to be
less than 1.4-1.5 MB in order to fit into a
9 matches
Mail list logo
