On 06/26/2013 12:31 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
On 06/19/2013 06:49 PM, Wookey wrote:
Doko - why did this path get changed?
Ping? Doko, any response?
Can you point to the patch where the change was introduced? I have no
idea
how to find the patch. Is the package in a repo somewhere?
I found
On 06/27/2013 10:28 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
However, I still don't understand what scenario could lead to a
problem. I'll guess, and you tell me if I'm right.
1) We have a arm-linux-gnueabihf installation of debian and we install
the gcc package natively. This installs the C runtime files to
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 04:39:15PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 03:13:48PM +0200, Arnaud Patard wrote:
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
We have a recurring problem with building kernels for armel: three
flavours (iop32x, ixp4xx, orion5x) require the
My main concern is that having a single node as buildd without another
for development purposes means that we don't have easy means to keep
testing for example kernel upgrades.
Hey Guys, I stumbled upon this thread while trying to investigate if
debian would work on the calxeda platform.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 07:27:54PM +, David Power wrote:
Hey Guys, I stumbled upon this thread while trying to investigate if
debian would work on the calxeda platform. We're one of calxedas partners
and have specific customers who would really love to see debian working on
ours/calxedas
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 07:27:54PM +, David Power wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 09:56:51AM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
My main concern is that having a single node as buildd without another
for development purposes means that we don't have easy means to keep
testing for example kernel
Hello David,
On Thu, 27 Jun 2013, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
Would http://packages.debian.org/jessie/linux-image-3.9-1-vexpress by
any chance be a valid kernel image for the highbank? I see in the git
logs of Linus's tree that there is a v7 multiplatform config that is
supposed to cover the
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 05:16:11PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
I am of course not in any way official Debian anything, just a long time
user of Debian on many architectures and machine types, but I think I
have a decent understanding of how things work.
We have to start somewhere, however.
Hello,
2013/6/27 Luca Filipozzi lfili...@debian.org:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 07:27:54PM +, David Power wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 09:56:51AM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
My main concern is that having a single node as buildd without another
for development purposes means that we don't
Hello,
2013/6/27 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 04:39:15PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 03:13:48PM +0200, Arnaud Patard wrote:
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
btw, iop32x is used on n2100 which are used on buildd/porter boxes.
On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 17:16 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 07:27:54PM +, David Power wrote:
Hey Guys, I stumbled upon this thread while trying to investigate if
debian would work on the calxeda platform. We're one of calxedas partners
and have specific customers
11 matches
Mail list logo
