Hi,
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 07:41:02PM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 7:28 PM, peter green plugw...@p10link.net wrote:
We can't use the neon option because no arm port of debian gaurantees that
neon will be available. So I belive until the no-fpu options are made
-- Forwarded message --
From: Thomas Orgis thomas-fo...@orgis.org
Date: Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 5:46 AM
Subject: Bug#738981: Switch to use generic_fpu for ARM
To: 738...@bugs.debian.org
There is no runtime detection in mpg123 for this and at least for the
decision of fixed
Am Mon, 17 Feb 2014 10:00:48 +0200
schrieb Riku Voipio riku.voi...@iki.fi:
Thanks Peter for explaining, this was how I ended up the suggestion
in the bug.
I see. In that case, I'll have to leave the package as it until
something along those lines is implemented.
Yes. The ideal
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:43:16AM +0100, Thomas Orgis wrote:
Am Mon, 17 Feb 2014 10:00:48 +0200
schrieb Riku Voipio riku.voi...@iki.fi:
Thanks Peter for explaining, this was how I ended up the suggestion
in the bug.
I see. In that case, I'll have to leave the package as it until
On 2014-02-17, Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com wrote:
Yes, you can do that - build several copies of the library and use the
hwcaps / auxv approach to pick the best one for the hardware at link
time.
NEON detection may come... but if we have linker selection, that would
be covered right now.
5 matches
Mail list logo
