Re: Testing custom kernel on armmp (i.MX6)

2014-05-08 Thread Michael Fladischer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 2014-05-07 16:39, Robert Nelson wrote: btw: Fabio just posted the hdmi patch for this board http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/322442 So video over hdmi should work on the udoo now too.. (the imx_drm driver is in

Re: Which kernel flavor for big.Little systems?

2014-05-08 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 05:56:28PM +0100, David Goodenough wrote: Well thank you for clearing up my mis-understanding about the big in big.Little. Being all 32 bit obviously makes life easier, in that all the apps will be armhf, which should mean it fits into the current Debian family

preparing for GCC 4.9

2014-05-08 Thread Matthias Klose
With gcc-4.9 now available in testing, it is time to prepare for the change of the default to 4.9, for a subset of architectures or for all (release) architectures. The defaults for the gdc, gccgo, gcj and gnat frontends already point to 4.9 and are used on all architectures. Issue #746805

Re: preparing for GCC 4.9

2014-05-08 Thread Yunqiang Su
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote: With gcc-4.9 now available in testing, it is time to prepare for the change of the default to 4.9, for a subset of architectures or for all (release) architectures. The defaults for the gdc, gccgo, gcj and gnat frontends

Re: [m68k] preparing for GCC 4.9

2014-05-08 Thread Thorsten Glaser
(excluding d-release for what they hatingly call “debian-ports spam”) Matthias Klose dixit: I would like to see some partial test rebuilds (like buildd or minimal chroot Haven’t tried yet, but Helmut Grohne does automated rebootstrapping of some ports using what he can get his hands on, and he

Re: [m68k] preparing for GCC 4.9

2014-05-08 Thread Helmut Grohne
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 03:49:51PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Matthias Klose dixit: I would like to see some partial test rebuilds (like buildd or minimal chroot Haven???t tried yet, but Helmut Grohne does automated rebootstrapping of some ports using what he can get his hands on, and

Re: Support for sunxi-based ARM systems in d-i

2014-05-08 Thread Ian Campbell
On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 21:24 +0200, Karsten Merker wrote: So this means that on an armhf system set up by d-i, the symlinks are actually in place where we need them for the boot scripts. I am very short on time at the moment, so I can't work on the topic now, but I'll look into it again some

Re: Support for sunxi-based ARM systems in d-i

2014-05-08 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
once again, respectfully may i ask, without prejudice and without obligation, that someone please consider documenting the steps taken so that others may easily replicate them, and i am going to continue this paragraph without a break so that i may point out that i am in no way requesting this FOR

Re: Support for sunxi-based ARM systems in d-i

2014-05-08 Thread Ian Campbell
On Thu, 2014-05-08 at 22:05 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: but for the BENEFIT OF THE DEBIAN PROJECT. debian-installer is incredibly hard to get properly compiled up: instructions and context entirely missing. There are daily builds of the installer, which will pick this up once

Re: Support for sunxi-based ARM systems in d-i

2014-05-08 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2014-05-08 at 22:05 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: once again, respectfully may i ask, without prejudice and without obligation, that someone please consider documenting the steps taken so that others may easily replicate them, and i am going to continue this paragraph