Re: Supporting armel/armhf in wheezy-lts

2016-04-23 Thread Luca Filipozzi
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 02:41:30PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > That's why I have been advocating for a change of the DMUP. It has been used > far too often to annoy persons who are being paid (or who are accepting > donations) to work on Debian instead of causing real troubles that could >

Re: Supporting armel/armhf in wheezy-lts

2016-04-23 Thread peter green
On 23/04/16 13:41, Raphael Hertzog wrote: Hi, On Fri, 22 Apr 2016, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: I am not speaking on behalf of DSA here. Thanks for making this clear. I also want to explain why I included DSA in the discussion: I wanted to make sure that the fact that we run wheezy

Re: Supporting armel/armhf in wheezy-lts

2016-04-23 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 14:41:30 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > I have also been looking at ways to bring the "LTS funding" closer to Debian > and to find a way to join all this in the Debian Partner program but we > don't have many volunteers interested in this work. We discussed it a bit >

Re: Supporting armel/armhf in wheezy-lts

2016-04-23 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Fri, 22 Apr 2016, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > I am not speaking on behalf of DSA here. Thanks for making this clear. I also want to explain why I included DSA in the discussion: I wanted to make sure that the fact that we run wheezy armel/armhf buildd for two more years do not go against

Re: Supporting armel/armhf in wheezy-lts

2016-04-23 Thread Holger Levsen
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 05:16:19PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > > The LTS period is about to start soon and we will send out an announce > > soon... it would be nice to be able to say a word about armel/armhf, so > > an official confirmation from ftpmasters/DSA would be nice. > > So, I'm a bit