On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 02:41:30PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> That's why I have been advocating for a change of the DMUP. It has been used
> far too often to annoy persons who are being paid (or who are accepting
> donations) to work on Debian instead of causing real troubles that could
>
On 23/04/16 13:41, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 22 Apr 2016, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
I am not speaking on behalf of DSA here.
Thanks for making this clear. I also want to explain why I included DSA
in the discussion: I wanted to make sure that the fact that we run wheezy
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 14:41:30 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I have also been looking at ways to bring the "LTS funding" closer to Debian
> and to find a way to join all this in the Debian Partner program but we
> don't have many volunteers interested in this work. We discussed it a bit
>
Hi,
On Fri, 22 Apr 2016, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> I am not speaking on behalf of DSA here.
Thanks for making this clear. I also want to explain why I included DSA
in the discussion: I wanted to make sure that the fact that we run wheezy
armel/armhf buildd for two more years do not go against
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 05:16:19PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > The LTS period is about to start soon and we will send out an announce
> > soon... it would be nice to be able to say a word about armel/armhf, so
> > an official confirmation from ftpmasters/DSA would be nice.
>
> So, I'm a bit
5 matches
Mail list logo