I just saw that there is only an very old version of dropbear in the
repository and tried to build current 2017.75. This fails in the file
tomcrypt_macros.h with an error similar to
https://wiki.debian.org/X32Port#amd64_assembly.
Attached is a full build log.
kind regards
txt.file
> Hello kirkwood folks,
>
> We have been seeing reports on the Debian arm list about
> instability/errors running Debian Stretch (4.9 based) on
> various Kirkwood 6282 based QNAP systems. Errors are things like [0,
> actually one of the earlier pre-4.9 reports, same symptoms as with 4.9
>
On Friday 28 July 2017 07:54:43 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 08:30:30AM +, Riku Voipio wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 09:45:49AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 08:56 +0100, Edmund Grimley Evans wrote:
> > > > > Does this emulation take a
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 08:30:30AM +, Riku Voipio wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 09:45:49AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 08:56 +0100, Edmund Grimley Evans wrote:
> > > > Does this emulation take a considerable performance hit, as opposed
> > > > to
> > > > running on
Package: binutils
Version: 2.29-1
Severity: important
binutils 2.29-1 causes many haskell packages to FTBFS, example:
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/arm64/haskell-asn1-encoding
...
[12 of 12] Compiling Data.ASN1.BinaryEncoding ( Data/ASN1/BinaryEncoding.hs,
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 09:45:49AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 08:56 +0100, Edmund Grimley Evans wrote:
> > > Does this emulation take a considerable performance hit, as opposed
> > > to
> > > running on armhf hardware/kernel, where the instruction doesn't
> > > appear
> > >
6 matches
Mail list logo
