Re: Feedback from the community -> ARM

2021-06-13 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 9:45 AM Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > Let me bring the idea on this list that, maybe, it is time for vendors > to start looking into moving away from using good old U-Boot on microsd > or similar to provide on-board SPI flash to store bootloader. So we > could stop

Re: Feedback from the community -> ARM

2021-06-13 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 01:42:55AM +0100, Pete Batard wrote: > >Granted we also should have logged a bug for that issue as soon as we picked >it up, so we have to share part of the blame on this one. But the delays in >processing #985956, even though we tried to bring attention over and over

Re: Feedback from the community -> ARM

2021-06-13 Thread Jeffrey Walton
>> This is no longer relevant, since the arm64 and armhf capable RPi >> boards are way more popular than the old boards now. >> >> https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise >> > > Pi Zero is still ARM v6 :( And the RPI-1's. I still have one to test Botan, Crypto++, GnuPG and OpenSSL on ARMv6. Jeff

Re: Feedback from the community -> ARM

2021-06-13 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 11:55:39PM +, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 11:34 AM Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > > Some of them are hugely true: at the time when the first RPi was released, > > it > > was released as ARM v6 with hardware floating point. Almost all Linux > >

Re: Feedback from the community -> ARM

2021-06-13 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
W dniu 13.06.2021 o 02:42, Pete Batard pisze: So, at the risk of being controversial, it doesn't seem to me like everybody in the Debian world has been that willing to embrace UEFI. Debian is one of distributions supporting UEFI on AArch64 from start of this port (2013). Just most of