powerpcspe ppc64 sh4* sparc64*
* these ports don't appear to have successfully built GCC 4.8 yet.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http
-2) whereas m68k still has only the 4.8.0-7 you
uploaded.
You will also first need newer binutils (= 2.23.52) which is still in
the build queue.
(This applies to ppc64 as well).
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org
builds
happening so we could see unexpected changes occurring.
[2]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds
So if something can make something that fulfills all the above goals it
would certainly be beneficial :)
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
to be very low. A
working JVM is quite a lot to ask, the current openjdk-7 is not even
built for mipsel in more. mipsel buildds and porterboxes had only 1GB
RAM maximum until now, and that is heavily used already for their
current tasks.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
that would be an accomplishment. And the smaller the initial set of
packages required to boostrap the process, the better.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/527665af.2040...@pyro.eu.org
, and the maintainer of the
pseudopackage being the ports list.
Would that be only for generic issues with a port, not specific to a
package? I doubt this would be used much. These bugs might typically
be reassigned to kernel packages or eglibc anyway.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
for call to 'qMin(double, qreal)'
/build/buildd-mcrl2_201210.1-1-armel-Kvmlhc/mcrl2-201210.1/tools/diagraphica/diagrameditor.cpp:528:51:
note: candidate is:
/usr/include/qt4/QtCore/qglobal.h:1196:34: note: templateclass T const T
qMin(const T, const T)
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste
]: http://lists.debian.org/5266df9d.9040...@pyro.eu.org
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/529688a8.8080
.
The issue with running the GCC testsuite on kfreebsd-amd64 buildds is
being fixed by FreeBSD upstream, and on Debian buildds within 1-2 weeks.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
be
appropriate for debian-devel-announce; or if your mail only concerns a
few ports it should be convenient to cross-post to the relevant ports'
lists only.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
from glibc/2.19-10 in:
http://ftp.debian-ports.org/debian/dists/sid/main/binary-sh4/Packages.bz2
So. although the sh4 buildds have built the sh4 .debs, they're not being
properly installed into that archive; you'll have to ask
debian-ports.org admins about it.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste
Hi,
Paul Wise wrote:
Do any porters have any input on this page?
https://wiki.debian.org/GettingPorted
This page seems it will be useful; I will add some bits to it.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org
re; but add to that the kernel and any bootloaders.
Being able to rebootstrap, should be part of the arch release
qualification anyway IMHO.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ating any or using devices.tar.gz; even for more exotic use
cases like BSD jails. hurd appears to have something equivalent.
Thanks for letting us know.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ork is still needed yet.
(Annoying that there are so many cheap boards that claim to be/do so
much and yet, are of little practical use if they can only boot a
vendor-supplied kernel).
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: haskell-http2
Version: 1.5.3-2
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-arm@lists.debian.org
Hi,
Wookey wrote:
> +++ Steven Chamberlain [2016-04-01 10:31 +0100]:
> > Currently haskell-http2 FTBFS on only armel:
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=haskell
hese armhf nodes!
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
it is practical (or rather, allow dpkg-buildflags to
enable it).
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
> target architecture of the ISO images.
I did not even realise that. So I will add kfreebsd-i386 next.
I expect there might be problems trying to build linux arches from a
kfreebsd host. But we should try to find out, and then maybe fix it.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
s
CODENAME=sid
$ export ARCHES=hurd-i386
$ CONF.sh && ./build.sh
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
diff --git a/CONF.sh b/CONF.sh
index 99e58ad..08ffbd7 100644
--- a/CONF.sh
+++ b/CONF.sh
@@ -62,11 +62,15 @@ export BASEDIR=`pwd`
# export CDNAME=debian
# Building $codenam
21 matches
Mail list logo