On 02/21/2011 11:18 AM, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Jeffrey B. Greenj...@kikisoso.org [2011-02-18 13:53]:
# /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf
# replace most with dep
MODULES=dep
Anyone out there know of any pitfalls in this approach?? I.e. are all
the crucial modules included in the initrd?
On 02/21/2011 11:22 AM, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Jeffrey B. Greenj...@kikisoso.org [2011-02-18 11:22]:
One of my slugs is still in the process of upgrading but I noticed
that during the setting up of the 2.6.32-5 kernel that the flashing
failed due to (output message):
I believe some other
Hi everyone,
One of my slugs is still in the process of upgrading but I noticed that
during the setting up of the 2.6.32-5 kernel that the flashing failed
due to (output message):
Running update-initramfs.
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-ixp4xx
Running flash-kernel.
On 02/18/2011 11:22 AM, Jeffrey B. Green wrote:
Hi everyone,
[...snip prev msg...]
After unpacking the initrd in order to look where the space is going, I see:
du -sm *
2 bin
1 conf
1 etc
1 init
14 lib
2 sbin
1 scripts
And working my way down I get
On 02/18/2011 11:48 AM, Jeffrey B. Green wrote:
On 02/18/2011 11:22 AM, Jeffrey B. Green wrote:
Hi everyone,
[...snip prev msg...]
[...snip...]
Are all these drivers really necessary?
By configureing the initramfs system, the size can be reduced, e.g. edit
/etc/initramfs-tools
Hi,
I'm posting to both lists since it seems to be relevant to both. The
problem that I'm experiencing only seems to be happening on my armel
(nslu2) systems. Squeeze upgrades to the i386 systems seem to be working
properly. However, since aptitude is not (afaict) particularly an app
On 02/09/2011 08:33 AM, Jeffrey B. Green wrote:
[...snip...]
Anyway, in a nutshell, I'm upgrading from a reprepro local repository
that is currently up to date with the debian repositories.
[...snip...]
The reprepro Package list(s) seem to be the problem. Checking out the
/v/l/dpkg/available
On 07/07/2010 01:36 PM, Jeffrey B. Green wrote:
Wookey writes:
+++ Jeffrey B. Green [2010-07-07 10:00 -0400]:
I have a couple of slugs both running debian arm and am now very much
aware of the fact that squeeze has dropped arm from the distributions in
favor of armel. The only migration
Hi,
In another exploration of migration avenues for us slug owners who still
haven't moved to armel, I was attempting the debootstrap method
suggested in:
http://wiki.debian.org/ArmEabiHowto#BuildingEABIreadyKernel
when I hit an error while building the kernel. It is:
... previous lines
On 09/30/2010 10:09 AM, Jeffrey B. Green wrote:
In examining the type mentioned above, I see that it is defined as 6
bytes (actually 5 but I assume it aligns on a 2-byte boundary). So, the
question is: how is the compiler (or linker) seeing the structure as
having 8 byte entries?
I'm
I have a couple of slugs both running debian arm and am now very much
aware of the fact that squeeze has dropped arm from the distributions in
favor of armel. The only migration procedure that I have discovered so
far is the one on the ArmEabiHowto, e.g. the section Migrating arm
installation
Wookey writes:
+++ Jeffrey B. Green [2010-07-07 10:00 -0400]:
I have a couple of slugs both running debian arm and am now very much
aware of the fact that squeeze has dropped arm from the distributions in
favor of armel. The only migration procedure that I have discovered so
far is the one
12 matches
Mail list logo
