Re: Cubox-i bullseye -> bookworm Upgrade failure

2023-08-13 Thread Reco
Hi. On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 04:53:13PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 10:55:44AM +0300, Reco wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 08:55:21AM +0200, Rainer Dorsch wrote: > > > dmesg reports for end0: > > > [7.771809] fec 2188000.et

Re: Cubox-i bullseye -> bookworm Upgrade failure

2023-08-04 Thread Reco
ry adding "net.ifnames=0" to kernel's commandline. Reco

Re: Activate a Real Time Clock chip on I2C in Raspberry Pi 4B with Debian (not Raspbian)

2023-04-17 Thread Reco
Hi. On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 02:48:44AM -0700, Rick Thomas wrote: > Sadly, when I do: > i2cdetect -l > I get nothing back. Leading me to conclude that there are no busses > available. "modprobe i2c-dev" should fix that. Reco

Re: Activate a Real Time Clock chip on I2C in Raspberry Pi 4B with Debian (not Raspbian)

2023-04-17 Thread Reco
ect to clarify things. Reco

Re: Help with testing u-boot!

2022-12-28 Thread Reco
ly > recent u-boot platforms in Debian, and u-boot has been blocked from > migration to testing partly because of this. > > As the bookworm freeze approaches, this is getting to be... worrysome! That Ordoid N2 board that I had was damaged about year ago. I have not procured a replacement to it since then. So I cannot test u-boot on Odroid N2 in the foreseeable future. Reco

Re: Debian on Pine64 H64B?

2021-09-10 Thread Reco
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 12:04:56PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > So why do we not have a .deb builder for kernels.? wiki.debian.org is your friend, consider learning how to search it. In this particular case, you probably want [1]. Reco [1] https://wiki.debian.

Re: Debian on Pine64 H64B?

2021-09-10 Thread Reco
Hi. On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 08:07:56AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Friday 10 September 2021 06:59:17 Reco wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 09:50:24AM +0200, LinAdmin wrote: > > > I have some doubts that debian.net has the same ownership > > > than of

Re: Debian on Pine64 H64B?

2021-09-10 Thread Reco
Hi. On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 09:50:24AM +0200, LinAdmin wrote: > I have some doubts that debian.net has the same ownership > than official debian.org? RPi images from raspi.debian.net are GPG-signed by Gunnar Wolf's key (who is Debian Developer), that's good enough for me. Reco

Re: Replacement for raspPi

2021-09-09 Thread Reco
Hi. On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 08:11:43PM +1000, Keith Bainbridge wrote: > On 7/9/21 22:46, Reco wrote: > > > Some will recall the discussion around raspberry adding a MS repo to > > > sources.list last year. > > I've "installed" fresh RaspiOS recentl

Re: fuse control on raspPi

2021-09-09 Thread Reco
w thread. Frankly, this subthread belongs to debian-user, there's nothing ARM-specific here. In the case of further questions regarding sshfs or network filesystems in general I suggest you to start a new thread at debian-user. Reco

Re: Debian on Pine64 H64B?

2021-09-07 Thread Reco
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 03:02:20PM +0100, Pete Batard wrote: > On 2021.09.07 13:31, Reco wrote: > > Yet there's a difference. Intel ME or AMD PSP do not require firmware to > > be written on a boot media, thus making the boot media redistributable > > and (other blobs exclu

Re: Replacement for raspPi

2021-09-07 Thread Reco
user pi. IMO that's expected from fuse. > Some will recall the discussion around raspberry adding a MS repo to > sources.list last year. I've "installed" fresh RaspiOS recently and they're still doing it. Reco [1] https://www.khadas.com/product-page/edge-v [2] https://www.hard

Re: Debian on Pine64 H64B?

2021-09-07 Thread Reco
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 11:00:29AM +0100, Pete Batard wrote: > Hi Reco, > > On 2021.09.07 10:42, Reco wrote: > > Hi. > > > > On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 10:29:40AM +0100, Pete Batard wrote: > > > Hi Gunnar, > > > > > > On 2021.09.06 18:59,

Re: Debian on Pine64 H64B?

2021-09-07 Thread Reco
nd the same has been true for Buster on the Pi 3 for some > time too [2]. A small nitpick. While it's indeed possible to boot rebuilt UEFI on Raspberry Pi3 (which is free software, since it's patched TianoCore), and boot unmodified Debian ARM64 via said UEFI - the booting of UEFI itself still requires Broadcom blobs, which are non-free software. Reco

Re: Debian on Pine64 H64B?

2021-09-04 Thread Reco
https://raspi.debian.net > I switched to Ubuntu LTS which made me (and many others) happy. Whatever floats your boat. Reco

Re: Progress report [Re: Debian Bullseye on Raspberry Pi 4 4GB?]

2021-02-22 Thread Reco
04. And if soldering is not your cup of tea - look for so-called Breakout Board Kit, like that one - [1]. [1] https://www.amazon.com/DS1307-Real-Clock-Breakout-Board/dp/B00NAY199E Reco

Re: Progress report [Re: Debian Bullseye on Raspberry Pi 4 4GB?]

2021-02-21 Thread Reco
amp on reboot) solves it to some extent, but nothing else does. Reco

Re: Progress report [Re: Debian Bullseye on Raspberry Pi 4 4GB?]

2021-02-21 Thread Reco
othing. End result - you can measure whatever happens during the boot just fine, but you start 1st Jan 1970 0:00 each boot. You see, the problem is not the timekeeping, it's the setting more-or-less the same time on different systems. Reco

Re: Progress report [Re: Debian Bullseye on Raspberry Pi 4 4GB?]

2021-02-21 Thread Reco
Hi. On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 06:10:08PM +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Du, 21 feb 21, 09:20:07, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 8:58 AM Reco wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 08:42:45AM -0500, Alan Corey wrote: > > > > I guess a q

Re: Progress report [Re: Debian Bullseye on Raspberry Pi 4 4GB?]

2021-02-21 Thread Reco
" (i.e. before NTP time sync kicks in), and that's valuable to me by itself. Reco

Re: Progress report [Re: Debian Bullseye on Raspberry Pi 4 4GB?]

2021-02-21 Thread Reco
Hi. On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 02:26:26AM -0800, Rick Thomas wrote: > On Sat, Feb 20, 2021, at 11:14 PM, Reco wrote: > > Hi. > > > > On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 10:53:18PM -0800, Rick Thomas wrote: > > > root@pi:~# ls -l /dev/rtc* > > > ls:

Re: Progress report [Re: Debian Bullseye on Raspberry Pi 4 4GB?]

2021-02-20 Thread Reco
berry PI has RTC, so this is expected. Reco

Re: Installation images for arm64

2021-01-07 Thread Reco
u-boot didn't even launch - see bl31.bin.log. Reco G12B:BL:6e7c85:7898ac;FEAT:E0F83180:2000;POC:F;RCY:0;EMMC:800;NAND:81;SD?:0;SD:0;READ:0;0. bl2_stage_init 0x01 bl2_stage_init 0x81 hw id: 0x - pwm id 0x01 bl2_stage_init 0xc1 bl2_stage_init 0x02 no sdio debug board detected L0: L1:070

Re: Installation images for arm64

2021-01-06 Thread Reco
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 10:19:48AM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On 2021-01-06, Reco wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 10:20:28PM +0300, Reco wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 10:21:01AM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > >> > Please file bugs and/or merge req

Re: Installation images for arm64

2021-01-06 Thread Reco
Hi. On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 10:20:28PM +0300, Reco wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 10:21:01AM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > > Please file bugs and/or merge requests on u-boot and > > arm-trusted-firmware if you want to get those parts enabled for Odroid > > N2

Re: Installation images for arm64

2020-10-27 Thread Reco
n.org, so it could take some time to reach bugs.d.o. Reco

Re: Installation images for arm64

2020-10-27 Thread Reco
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 08:59:38AM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On 2020-10-27, Reco wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 08:02:18AM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > >> It looks like u-boot 2020.10 has an odroid-n2 target and > >> arm-trusted-firmware 2.3 has an amlog

Re: Installation images for arm64 (was Re: Bullseye installer, daily image broken for cubox-i)

2020-10-27 Thread Reco
> to test them semi-regularly. I happen to have an Odroid N2. What exactly such testing would require? Reco

Re: bt question

2020-09-26 Thread Reco
here's nothing ARM-specific in this problem. Second, > ii pi-bluetooth 0.1.15 > all Raspberry Pi 3 bluetooth Proper Debian does not provide this package, and a certain popular GNU/Linux distribution for Raspberry Pi is an off-topic here. Reco

Re: Pi2 does not boot with debian-10.3.0-armhf-netinst.iso on SDCard

2020-05-28 Thread Reco
Hi. On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 12:48:47AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Reco dijo [Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 01:29:13PM +0300]: > > > There is a very minor issue with the 0/1 image (which I intend to fix > > > now). > > > > There are two, actually: > > &g

Re: Raspberry Pi images SSH access

2020-04-29 Thread Reco
.. enable SSH access? Not for the root user. These images have Debian default set in sshd_config, and for this specific case it's "PermitRootLogin prohibit-password". You'll probably need to change that. Or get yourself USB TTL adapter and hook up to the UART. Reco

Re: Pi2 does not boot with debian-10.3.0-armhf-netinst.iso on SDCard

2020-04-26 Thread Reco
pre-up iptables-restore < /etc/iptables/rules.v4 pre-up ip6tables-restore < /etc/iptables/rules.v6 2) An attempt to launch agetty on ttyS1 (which should be uart console according to /proc/cmdline) fails with: agetty[655]: /dev/ttyS1: not a tty Reco

Re: Raspberry Pi

2020-03-02 Thread Reco
pected. Reco

Re: Raspberry Pi

2020-03-02 Thread Reco
ses, Glxgears is an old and somewhat obsolete benchmark. Try using glmark instead. Reco

Re: Armbian

2020-02-04 Thread Reco
only possible culprit being the installation of u-boot itself (by d-i) itself, in the case that Debian-provided u-boot is unable to function on that particular board. Which is not the case for HC2, but I lack HC1 to check it. Reco

Re: Armbian

2020-02-02 Thread Reco
to date and seem to work pretty reliably. I've yet to see an announcement from Armbian at oss-security maillist. E-mails from Debian Developers land at oss-security within a day of publishing DSA. Reco [1] https://wiki.debian.org/InstallingDebianOn/OdroidHC1

Re: qnap TS-219P hdd led

2019-11-29 Thread Reco
ious > release?) QNAP TS-419. HDD LEDs were red for me since I installed Debian there (squeeze IIRC). I worked around it by setting qpios 46, 47, 48 and 49 to "out" like this: echo 46 > /sys/class/gpio/export echo out > /sys/class/gpio/gpio46/direction echo 1 > /sys/class/gpio/gpio46/value echo 46 > /sys/class/gpio/unexport Reco

Re: making debs for u-boot kernels

2019-07-30 Thread Reco
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 06:02:05AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > That simple question is: > > > > > > What log file do you want to see? > > > > Assuming Debian defaults - /var/log/kern.log, > > is empty. kern.log.1 is over 200k, and the list won't accept that. This very e-mail that I'm

Re: making debs for u-boot kernels

2019-07-29 Thread Reco
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 07:56:25AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Monday 29 July 2019 05:08:49 Reco wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 08:15:20PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > On Sunday 28 July 2019 00:27:36 Reco wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 12:

Re: making debs for u-boot kernels

2019-07-29 Thread Reco
Hi. On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 08:15:20PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Sunday 28 July 2019 00:27:36 Reco wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 12:13:21AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > > > That, and a whole restaraunt sized menu of dpkg stuff for

Re: is the systemd .link mechanism supposed to work?

2019-07-28 Thread Reco
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 11:04:41AM +0200, Luca Olivetti wrote: > El 27/7/19 a les 23:20, Reco ha escrit: > > > > > > yet it always gets the name wlxe894f615307a. > > > > What you're doing colud work. > > The problem is - you have NIC that's attached via U

Re: making debs for u-boot kernels

2019-07-28 Thread Reco
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 06:50:53AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Sunday 28 July 2019 00:27:36 Reco wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 12:13:21AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > > > That, and a whole restaraunt sized menu of dpkg stuff for > > > > >

Re: making debs for u-boot kernels

2019-07-27 Thread Reco
o ( about > 1.7 fps for glxgearrs full screen ) that otherwise works well. It's not a Debian, it's Raspbian. > > > The user can't even look at dmseg! How dumb is that? > > > > A security feature. If you want that: > > > No Reco, its not security, its harassment

Re: making debs for u-boot kernels

2019-07-27 Thread Reco
t dmseg! How dumb is that? A security feature. If you want that: /sbin/sysctl -w kernel.dmesg_restrict=0 Reco

Re: is the systemd .link mechanism supposed to work?

2019-07-27 Thread Reco
dictably™. In your place I'd consider myself lucky - at least you have a network interface that's always called eth0, the way the kernel wants it. > Extra points if it involves getting rid of systemd altogether ;-) It won't help you here. To solve this particular problem once and for all, you need a replacement for udev, which Debian does not provide. Reco

Re: making debs for u-boot kernels

2019-07-27 Thread Reco
o disconnect ALL that stuff. ;-) An exaggeration. My installation was successful with the following devices attached to the board: USB keyboard HDMI-to-VGA adapter Raspberry Pi Camera Ethernet cable I was too lazy to dig out that USB TTL cable for the true console, but I suppose that it won't interfere either. Reco

Re: making debs for u-boot kernels

2019-07-27 Thread Reco
On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 12:02:18PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Friday 26 July 2019 17:35:01 Reco wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 12:49:32PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > I am furious (fat lot of good that does me) with the lack of to

Re: making debs for u-boot kernels

2019-07-27 Thread Reco
you downloaded to the root of the > FAT partition. 'Extract' does not mean you copy the iso file into the partition. You mount iso, and copy files from there to the partition's filesystem. Reco

Re: loss of synaptic due to wayland

2019-07-11 Thread Reco
apt-get source {the-exact-same-package-name} sudo apt-get source raspberrypi-firmware As others said, this maillist is unsuitable place for Raspian-specific question. Reco

Re: Assorted arm-buster problems #1

2019-07-03 Thread Reco
ing all future similar problems (involving configuration of a resolver, IP routing and package management) to debian-user. Thank you in advance, Reco

Re: heatsink -- was [Re: Raspberry Pi 4 is announced]

2019-06-30 Thread Reco
4) Wayland requires kernel version 5.1 IIRC. If you need ODroid board you probably better getting yourself ODroid HC2. That one actually works with Debian stretch and a kernel from the backports. Reco [1] https://forum.odroid.com/viewtopic.php?t=33865

Re: Problems using stock kernel armmp with Marvell 38x hardware.

2018-10-20 Thread Reco
Hi. On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 01:44:36PM +0200, LinAdmin wrote: > On 19.10.2018 23:35, Reco wrote: > > Hi. > > > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 11:25:47PM +0200, LinAdmin wrote: > >> On 19.10.2018 20:12, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > >>> Hello, > >

Re: Problems using stock kernel armmp with Marvell 38x hardware.

2018-10-19 Thread Reco
gged into it, the load average is below > > 0.1 and according to htop the CPUs run at < 1%. > > > > Best regards > > Uwe > > > Using top or htop show that cpu load. What about 'perf top' result? I happen to have Armada385/Caiman with stock Debian kernel, and I see no such CPU load. Reco