Re: Bug#615513: release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive

2012-01-09 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:00 PM, peter green plugw...@p10link.net wrote: armhf has now pretty much cleared the needs-build queue (the only things left are non-free stuff and recently added stuff) and has built arround 89% of the archive (placing it between kfreebsd and ia64) with about 99.5% up

Re: Bug#615513: release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive

2012-01-09 Thread Mark Hymers
On Mon, 09, Jan, 2012 at 10:10:57AM +0100, Reinhard Tartler spoke thus.. On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:00 PM, peter green plugw...@p10link.net wrote: armhf has now pretty much cleared the needs-build queue (the only things left are non-free stuff and recently added stuff) and has built arround

Re: Bug#615513: release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive

2012-01-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2012-01-08 at 05:04 +, peter green wrote: An initial push of packages to testing occurred with tonight's britney run. There's a certain amount of uninstallability and loads of missing packages still, but it's a start :) I guess the next step is to try and get it to the

Re: Bug#615513: release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive

2012-01-07 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 22:54 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: I had been planning on having a look at the situation for both armhf and s390x over the period between Christmas and New Year, but for a variety of reasons that never happened. It's still on my short-term to-do list; it's not quite as

Re: Bug#615513: release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive

2012-01-07 Thread peter green
An initial push of packages to testing occurred with tonight's britney run. There's a certain amount of uninstallability and loads of missing packages still, but it's a start :) I guess the next step is to try and get it to the point where it is bootstrapable. When I tried to bootstrap it

Re: Bug#615513: release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive

2012-01-04 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:24 AM, peter green plugw...@p10link.net wrote: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: (fwiw, the not-yet-built list includes webkit and ruby1.9.1, each of which have a number of other

Re: Bug#615513: release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive

2012-01-04 Thread David Given
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: [...] ahh... webkit. do you have a system anywhere that has 2gb of RAM? if not, i strongly strongly advise skipping the debug builds on any webkit library. I'm running the prerelease Ubuntu precise on armhf. They have built webkit, but it just plain

Re: Bug#615513: release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive

2012-01-04 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:55 AM, David Given d...@cowlark.com wrote: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: [...]  ahh... webkit.  do you have a system anywhere that has 2gb of RAM? if not, i strongly strongly advise skipping the debug builds on any webkit library. I'm running the prerelease

Re: Bug#615513: release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive

2012-01-03 Thread peter green
armhf has now pretty much cleared the needs-build queue (the only things left are non-free stuff and recently added stuff) and has built arround 89% of the archive (placing it between kfreebsd and ia64) with about 99.5% up to date (placing it between amd64 and i386). Would now be a good time

Re: Bug#615513: release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive

2012-01-03 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: (fwiw, the not-yet-built list includes webkit and ruby1.9.1, each of which have a number of other packages directly or indirectly stuck behind them). ahh... webkit. do you have a system anywhere that has 2gb of

Re: Bug#615513: release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive

2012-01-03 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton l...@lkcl.net wrote:  anything outside of that - even by a marginal amount - will result in the build machine absolutely thrashing its nuts off. [for anything in excess of 24 hours]. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Bug#615513: release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive

2012-01-03 Thread peter green
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: (fwiw, the not-yet-built list includes webkit and ruby1.9.1, each of which have a number of other packages directly or indirectly stuck behind them). ahh... webkit.