Re: Debian Bookworm+ on Cavium ThunderX?

2024-04-17 Thread Wookey
On 2024-04-17 16:37 +0200, Steffen Grunewald wrote: > On Mon, 2024-04-15 at 14:55:06 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > On Fri, 2024-04-12 at 09:28 +0200, Steffen Grunewald wrote: > > > > > Any attempt to boot a Bullseye (5.x) or Bookworm kernel (6.x) resulted in > > > an early kernel panic. > That's

Re: Debian Bookworm+ on Cavium ThunderX?

2024-04-17 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 04:37:50PM +0200, Steffen Grunewald wrote: > On Mon, 2024-04-15 at 14:55:06 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > On Fri, 2024-04-12 at 09:28 +0200, Steffen Grunewald wrote: > > > > > Any attempt to boot a Bullseye (5.x) or Bookworm kernel (6.x) resulted in > > > an early kernel

Re: Debian Bookworm+ on Cavium ThunderX?

2024-04-17 Thread Steffen Grunewald
On Mon, 2024-04-15 at 14:55:06 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Fri, 2024-04-12 at 09:28 +0200, Steffen Grunewald wrote: > > > Any attempt to boot a Bullseye (5.x) or Bookworm kernel (6.x) resulted in > > an early kernel panic. > > Try the latest sid kernel (6.7.9) and the latest upstream too.

Re: Debian Bookworm+ on Cavium ThunderX?

2024-04-15 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, 2024-04-12 at 09:28 +0200, Steffen Grunewald wrote: > Upgrading to Debian Buster was successful, the current kernel is 4.19.0-25 > aka 4.19.289-2. (It doesn't even properly identify the CPU, only gives a > BogoMIPS value of 200.00.) > > Any attempt to boot a Bullseye (5.x) or Bookworm

Debian Bookworm+ on Cavium ThunderX?

2024-04-12 Thread Steffen Grunewald
Good morning, I beg your pardon if this problem has been discussed before, but I couldn't find anything useful in the list archives. We've been operating a Gigabyte R120-T35-00 (Mainboard model MT30-GS2-00) equipped with a Cavium ThunderX (CN8880) 32-core processor, for several years now. It was