Re: armel/armhf arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concernsj

2018-08-18 Thread peter green
On 18/08/18 11:01, Roger Shimizu wrote: On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 12:33 PM, Hideki Yamane wrote: Hi, So it'll be super great if you (or your boss) can kindly sponsor some armel/armhf hardwares that support to install 4GB memory. From DebConf18 seesion "Building a Debian Derivative: Lessons

Re: Re: armel/armhf arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concernsj

2018-08-18 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 07:01:39PM +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote: >... > Yes. In latest ARM BoF of DebConf18, Steve (93sam) informed us that > he's trying to rebuild all the armhf archive on arm64 box. > When that's done, we will get to know how many packages need to fix. > If the number of those

Re: Re: armel/armhf arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concernsj

2018-08-18 Thread Roger Shimizu
On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 12:33 PM, Hideki Yamane wrote: > Hi, > >> So it'll be super great if you (or your boss) can kindly sponsor some >> armel/armhf hardwares that support to install 4GB memory. > > From DebConf18 seesion "Building a Debian Derivative: Lessons Learned > and Solutions Found"

Re: Re: armel/armhf arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concernsj

2018-08-17 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, > So it'll be super great if you (or your boss) can kindly sponsor some > armel/armhf hardwares that support to install 4GB memory. From DebConf18 seesion "Building a Debian Derivative: Lessons Learned and Solutions Found" by Alex Doyle from Cumulus Network, they run "Jessie on

Re: armel/armhf arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concernsj

2018-07-24 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> On Jul 24, 2018, at 11:20 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote: > > [ Dropped cc to debian-ports etc., switched to debian-arm instead ] > >> As for the hardware, you should watch out for hardware with ARM Cortex Cores. >> Alternatively, X-Gene 1. ThunderX, ThunderX2 and Centriq are definitely not >>

Re: armel/armhf arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concernsj

2018-07-24 Thread Steve McIntyre
[ Dropped cc to debian-ports etc., switched to debian-arm instead ] On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 04:11:06PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >Hi Roger! > >On 07/23/2018 10:42 AM, Roger Shimizu wrote: >> I talked to a few people about keeping armel in buster, during 1st and >> 2nd day in

Re: armel/armhf arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concernsj

2018-07-23 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi Roger! On 07/23/2018 10:42 AM, Roger Shimizu wrote: > I talked to a few people about keeping armel in buster, during 1st and > 2nd day in debcamp. > Seems the blocker is just the buildd server hardware, and memory size it has. According to my colleague Alex Graf at SUSE, you can definitely

Re: armel/armhf arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concernsj

2018-07-23 Thread Roger Shimizu
Dear armel/armhf shakeholders, I talked to a few people about keeping armel in buster, during 1st and 2nd day in debcamp. Seems the blocker is just the buildd server hardware, and memory size it has. On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 7:04 PM, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > > Quoting Uwe Kleine-König : >> >>